Unix Technical Forum

IDE-RAID on HP Proliant ML310

This is a discussion on IDE-RAID on HP Proliant ML310 within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hello I'm installing slackware 9.1 on an HP ML310 server, which has a ServerWorks Integrated RAID adapter (IDE). In ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 06:55 AM
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Fastr=E9?=
 
Posts: n/a
Default IDE-RAID on HP Proliant ML310

Hello

I'm installing slackware 9.1 on an HP ML310 server, which has a
ServerWorks Integrated RAID adapter (IDE). In Windows, everything is ok,
but I've always wondered what it is, software or hardware RAID. If it's
software RAID, what's the purpose of this extra 'RAID-controller'?
I want to use two identical disk in a mirror configuration (RAID 1), and
I can create the array using the BIOS setup.

I tried using ataraid.i kernel, it does recognize my controller, but not
as a RAID-controller. So the disks are recognized as /dev/hda &
/dev/hdb, not /dev/ataraid or something.
Is it worth trying to compile a newer kernel (2.6?), or does someone
have a better idea?
Thanks

Peter
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 07:18 AM
null@void.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IDE-RAID on HP Proliant ML310

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:11:26 +0100, Peter Fastré
<peterpuntjefastre@wanadoo.be> wrote:

>Hello
>
>I'm installing slackware 9.1 on an HP ML310 server, which has a
>ServerWorks Integrated RAID adapter (IDE). In Windows, everything is ok,
>but I've always wondered what it is, software or hardware RAID. If it's
>software RAID, what's the purpose of this extra 'RAID-controller'?
>I want to use two identical disk in a mirror configuration (RAID 1), and
>I can create the array using the BIOS setup.
>
>I tried using ataraid.i kernel, it does recognize my controller, but not
>as a RAID-controller. So the disks are recognized as /dev/hda &
>/dev/hdb, not /dev/ataraid or something.
>Is it worth trying to compile a newer kernel (2.6?), or does someone
>have a better idea?
>Thanks
>
>Peter



Software RAID works by pretending to be a hardware controller. This
puts more workload on the CPU and is only meant for systems without a
true RAID adapter.

You should use hardware RAID whenever possible - much better
performance and stability. It is also OS independent, so there are
fewer driver issues.
The only thing you need to watch for is a change in the device name -
/dev/hda1 might become /dev/{adapter}/hda1, or something similar.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com