This is a discussion on Which newsgroup reader do you use under linux? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps for school and had ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. I would guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. |
| |||
| Mikey <poo@doo.com> wrote: > I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps > for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar > with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. I would > guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. tin, which I personally prefer over slrn, but both are excellent text mode newsreaders. tin can understand the mouse as well for selecting things to read etc. -- Chris Green (cgreen@x-1.net) |
| |||
| Mikey wrote: > I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps > for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar > with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. I would > guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. Netscape.. and I don't give a *&^* what others think about it DB |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <fbqaivktrvo7h1lp9g4nts3sn51n8ipfp5@4ax.com>, Mikey wrote: > I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps > for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar > with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. I would > guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. Even though your question is offtopic for this newsgroup, it's already been discussed many times here. Search Google groups for the archives of these discussions (and in the future search there first before posting). - --keith - -- kkeller-mmmspam@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us (try just my userid to email me) alt.os.linux.slackware FAQ: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj8lcuoACgkQhVcNCxZ5ID/mDACfXP5gDgbtNwVlPFOYXcW1obh+ bYIAoIfbV7rmI6DOcUfBttF5qXYGDUTg =mkho -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| Mikey <poo@doo.com> writes: > I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps > for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar > with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. I would > guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. If you use Xemacs or Emacs, you should at least consider Gnus! www.gnus.org Slrn and tin are good too. Glyn -- RTFM http://www.tldp.org/index.html GAFC http://www.slackware.com/book/index....rce=book1.html STFW http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...inux.slackware GAFL http://www.xemacs.org http://www.vim.org |
| |||
| On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:22:33 GMT, Mikey <poo@doo.com> wrote: > I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps > for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar > with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. I would > guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. I use slrn. -- -core_dump -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS/CC d- s-:+ a--- C+++ UL+ P L++++ E--- W++ N+++ o? K? w(--) O? M-- V? PS+(---) PE(++) Y+ PGP- t+ 5? X+ R tv b DI- D+(---) G e h! r--(---) z-- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Segmentation fault (core dumped) |
| |||
| Mikey <poo@doo.com> wrote: > I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps > for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar > with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. I would > guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. Installing slrn configured with slrnpull support, it is possible to to read (off-line) from slrnpull news spool directory using slrn, tin or gnus. Tried the three of them and found tin to be the most convenient for me. I haven't used Agent under Wine. --Julio |
| |||
| On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:22:33 +0000, Mikey wrote: > I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps > for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar > with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. If you were using pan you would not have had to ask such a question. You use X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564. > I would > guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. If that newsreader cannot even let you know what everyone else is using then just how good is it? |
| |||
| Glyn Millington wrote: > Mikey <poo@doo.com> writes: > >> I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps >> for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar >> with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. I would >> guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. > > If you use Xemacs or Emacs, you should at least consider Gnus! > > www.gnus.org > > Slrn and tin are good too. > > > Glyn I'm a heathen. I use knode. Fran |
| ||||
| On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:37:54 -0500, Dave Uhring <daveuhring@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:22:33 +0000, Mikey wrote: > >> I had slack on my comp a few months ago but needed some windows apps >> for school and had to take it off. Now to try again. I am familiar >> with Pan although I find it a little less refined than agent. > >If you were using pan you would not have had to ask such a question. You >use X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564. > >> I would >> guess some of you use agent under wine. Please let me know. Thanks. > >If that newsreader cannot even let you know what everyone else is using >then just how good is it? > I use Agent under WINE, by default it doesn't show you the headers. Guess the OP didn't think to look at that option. |