Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:19 PM
SkeeBall
 
Posts: n/a
Default [OT] Problems with Pan...

When I respond to a multi-line post with just one or two lines Pan goes
into a race condition and for all intents and purposes locks up on me. I
think it's doing this because it's unable to launch the warning about
"most of the message is quoted text" or whatever it is. There are some
groups that this is the norm though and isn't considered rude, otherwise I
wouldn't do it.

So, if anyone has time to test this you can do so by posting something
like this: http://www.lipsum.com/ - the default 5 paragraphs is plenty -
to a test group then follow it up with a one or two line response. The
first message goes fine for me the second will not.

Thanks in advance if anyone gives it a go.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:20 PM
raoul
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:08:42 -0600, SkeeBall wrote:

> When I respond to a multi-line post with just one or two lines Pan goes
> into a race condition and for all intents and purposes locks up on me. I
> think it's doing this because it's unable to launch the warning about
> "most of the message is quoted text" or whatever it is. There are some
> groups that this is the norm though and isn't considered rude, otherwise I
> wouldn't do it.
>
> So, if anyone has time to test this you can do so by posting something
> like this: http://www.lipsum.com/ - the default 5 paragraphs is plenty -
> to a test group then follow it up with a one or two line response. The
> first message goes fine for me the second will not.
>
> Thanks in advance if anyone gives it a go.


I did the test as requested and Pan hangs every time I try to send the
message. I have to go to a console and do "killall pan".

I've noticed this often before but hadn't identified the conditions.

I also have a problem doing an initial post if I don't intentionally wrap
the text using the little page-wrap icon on the icon bar of the
compose-message window.

Any fixes would be greatly appreciated. I like Pan, but I don't think I
can put up with this very often.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:20 PM
Loki Harfagr
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

Le Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:08:42 -0600, SkeeBall a écrit*:

> When I respond to a multi-line post with just one or two lines Pan goes
> into a race condition and for all intents and purposes locks up on me. I
> think it's doing this because it's unable to launch the warning about
> "most of the message is quoted text" or whatever it is. There are some
> groups that this is the norm though and isn't considered rude, otherwise I
> wouldn't do it.
>
> So, if anyone has time to test this you can do so by posting something
> like this: http://www.lipsum.com/ - the default 5 paragraphs is plenty -


Ok, so did I.

> to a test group then follow it up with a one or two line response. The
> first message goes fine for me the second will not.


Then, it's even worse here, it freezes while pushing the first message !
Horrid, I hat to kill the poor cat =:¿]

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:20 PM
SkeeBall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

raoul wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:08:42 -0600, SkeeBall wrote:
>
>> When I respond to a multi-line post with just one or two lines Pan goes
>> into a race condition and for all intents and purposes locks up on me. I
>> think it's doing this because it's unable to launch the warning about
>> "most of the message is quoted text" or whatever it is. There are some
>> groups that this is the norm though and isn't considered rude, otherwise
>> I wouldn't do it.
>>
>> So, if anyone has time to test this you can do so by posting something
>> like this: http://www.lipsum.com/ - the default 5 paragraphs is plenty -
>> to a test group then follow it up with a one or two line response. The
>> first message goes fine for me the second will not.
>>
>> Thanks in advance if anyone gives it a go.

>
> I did the test as requested and Pan hangs every time I try to send the
> message. I have to go to a console and do "killall pan".
>
> I've noticed this often before but hadn't identified the conditions.
>
> I also have a problem doing an initial post if I don't intentionally wrap
> the text using the little page-wrap icon on the icon bar of the
> compose-message window.
>
> Any fixes would be greatly appreciated. I like Pan, but I don't think I
> can put up with this very often.


Thanks for confirming this. I've filed a bug report and hopefully the Pan
developers can figure out what's happening. This started a month or two ago
for me and Pan hasn't changed in that time so I believe that the problem is
with an updated library.

I hadn't noticed the problem with the wrapping but if my hypothesis that the
problem occurs when Pan tries to launch a warning dialog is correct then
this would make sense - I _think_ Pan warns when posting long lines, KNode
does.

Thanks again, it's good to know that it's not something wrong with my
system .
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:20 PM
SkeeBall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

Loki Harfagr wrote:

> Le Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:08:42 -0600, SkeeBall a écritÂ*:
>
>> When I respond to a multi-line post with just one or two lines Pan goes
>> into a race condition and for all intents and purposes locks up on me. I
>> think it's doing this because it's unable to launch the warning about
>> "most of the message is quoted text" or whatever it is. There are some
>> groups that this is the norm though and isn't considered rude, otherwise
>> I wouldn't do it.
>>
>> So, if anyone has time to test this you can do so by posting something
>> like this: http://www.lipsum.com/ - the default 5 paragraphs is plenty -

>
> Ok, so did I.
>
>> to a test group then follow it up with a one or two line response. The
>> first message goes fine for me the second will not.

>
> Then, it's even worse here, it freezes while pushing the first message !
> Horrid, I hat to kill the poor cat =:Å‹]


Well, that's interesting - thanks for confirming the problem by the way. I
haven't had severe problems with the initial send but it does seem to use a
lot of CPU when sending. I've filed a bug report and hopefully the Pan
developers can figure out the problem. Personally, I like Pan a little
better than KNode.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:21 PM
Chick Tower
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:08:42 -0600, SkeeBall wrote:

> When I respond to a multi-line post with just one or two lines Pan goes
> into a race condition and for all intents and purposes locks up on me. I
> think it's doing this because it's unable to launch the warning about
> "most of the message is quoted text" or whatever it is. There are some
> groups that this is the norm though and isn't considered rude, otherwise I
> wouldn't do it.
>
> So, if anyone has time to test this you can do so by posting something
> like this: http://www.lipsum.com/ - the default 5 paragraphs is plenty -
> to a test group then follow it up with a one or two line response. The
> first message goes fine for me the second will not.
>
> Thanks in advance if anyone gives it a go.


Works fine for Pan 0.14.2 on Slackware 9.1.
--

Chick Tower

For e-mail: aols . sent . towerboy AT xoxy . net


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:26 PM
raoul
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:08:32 -0600, SkeeBall wrote:

> Thanks for confirming this. I've filed a bug report and hopefully the
> Pan developers can figure out what's happening.


I'm glad you filed a bug report. This is pretty much a showstopper for me.
Still, I keep coming back to Pan, because I just can't find another Linux
newsreader that I like.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 04:43 AM
raoul
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:59:24 +0000, raoul wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:08:32 -0600, SkeeBall wrote:
>
>> Thanks for confirming this. I've filed a bug report and hopefully the
>> Pan developers can figure out what's happening.

>
> I'm glad you filed a bug report. This is pretty much a showstopper for me.
> Still, I keep coming back to Pan, because I just can't find another Linux
> newsreader that I like.


I'm thinking increasingly that this is a Slackware-specific problem that
Pan is having. I tried Pan on Mepis and didn't have this problem. Also, I
put a post on linuxquestions.org Software forum, and no one who's not
using Slackware has reported this problem.

But what could the matter be? It's really irksome.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 04:44 AM
SkeeBall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

raoul wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:59:24 +0000, raoul wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:08:32 -0600, SkeeBall wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for confirming this. I've filed a bug report and hopefully the
>>> Pan developers can figure out what's happening.

>>
>> I'm glad you filed a bug report. This is pretty much a showstopper for
>> me. Still, I keep coming back to Pan, because I just can't find another
>> Linux newsreader that I like.

>
> I'm thinking increasingly that this is a Slackware-specific problem that
> Pan is having. I tried Pan on Mepis and didn't have this problem. Also, I
> put a post on linuxquestions.org Software forum, and no one who's not
> using Slackware has reported this problem.
>
> But what could the matter be? It's really irksome.


I still think it's something to do with libraries. I did the traceback and
runlog as requested on the pan bug reporting page and added them to the bug
so maybe they'll take a look at it.

I used Arch Linux for a while and had the same problems on it after some
updates - same with Slackware, worked fine and then *bam* something changed
and it wasn't Pan itself. I don't know how to figure it out using the
traceback and runlog but I'm hoping it helps the Pan developer(s).

I have a spare box or two so maybe I'll put straight Slackware 10 on and see
if that has problems - if I have time, maybe I can upgrade one thing at a
time and see if I can figure out in a brute force way what breaks it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 04:45 AM
raoul
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Problems with Pan...

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:46:59 -0600, SkeeBall wrote:

> I still think it's something to do with libraries. I did the traceback and
> runlog as requested on the pan bug reporting page and added them to the bug
> so maybe they'll take a look at it.
>
> I used Arch Linux for a while and had the same problems on it after some
> updates - same with Slackware, worked fine and then *bam* something changed
> and it wasn't Pan itself. I don't know how to figure it out using the
> traceback and runlog but I'm hoping it helps the Pan developer(s).
>
> I have a spare box or two so maybe I'll put straight Slackware 10 on and see
> if that has problems - if I have time, maybe I can upgrade one thing at a
> time and see if I can figure out in a brute force way what breaks it.


Someone on the Pan mailing list thinks that the problem shows up with
newer versions of gtk+. I think he's on to something, because after I
downgraded my gtk+ from 2.6.1 to 2.4.3, the problem goes away. A couple of
others have reported the same thing.

Now my question is this: is the problem with Pan, or with gtk+?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664<