I have decided that you really are right about pgp. It's simply an
affectation and it really doesn't "prove" that a post is a forgery.
For example, if this post was a forgery, I could never prove it.

So, unless I change my mind (again) I will no longer be using pgp
and I apologize to all of those I have annoyed.

- --
Cheers
Res

Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:03:58 +0000, Res did catÂ*:

> I have decided that you really are right about pgp. It's simply an
> affectation and it really doesn't "prove" that a post is a forgery. For
> example, if this post was a forgery, I could never prove it.
>
> So, unless I change my mind (again) I will no longer be using pgp and I
> apologize to all of those I have annoyed.

are you the Y2K bug?

Res wrote:

> I have decided that you really are right about pgp. It's simply an

You know Roger Maynard it would really help you to impersonate people if you
could make threading work. Do you even know how the tools you use work or
are you just another wannabe script kiddie?

Richard James

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Richard James wrote:

>
> Res wrote:
>
>> I have decided that you really are right about pgp. It's simply an
>
> You know Roger Maynard it would really help you to impersonate people if you
> could make threading work. Do you even know how the tools you use work or
> are you just another wannabe script kiddie?
>
> Richard James

Did he? spamassassin must be working real well, I never saw it
and the fact that I access this group via a mailing list kinds of gives
away any impersonations


>

- --
Cheers
Res

PGP - Just another way to assist preventing Roger Maynards impersonations,
even though at times he is funny as with his denials.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHFKMVsWhAmSIQh7MRApWkAJ9RQOGsyzpCmnCsG4B529 PEZ4U4iwCeLNSS
Pp2407ChW2aEdKfHKLkUuIQ=
=KQ/e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----