SEO

"Kingbarry2000" <kingbarrypublic@hotmail.com> wrote in message:<JJArb.356231$6C4.15149@pd7tw1no>...

> Go away

At least I'm not a pedafile like you!
(Randy says 'Hi!' )


cordially, as always,

rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:11:45 GMT, realtomargarino@hotmail.com (The
Regulars) wrote:

>
>"Kingbarry2000" <kingbarrypublic@hotmail.com> wrote in
>message:<JJArb.356231$6C4.15149@pd7tw1no>...
>
>> Go away
>
>At least I'm not a pedafile like you!
> (Randy says 'Hi!' )
>
>
>cordially, as always,
>
>rm

But at least he's not illiterate and knows what a spell-checker is
huh?

hint: pedafile = paedophile.

got it yet?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQEVAwUBP7CyqRnQJBJ8Dmw5AQF/5ggAmWuiTq4vw2m6/DjU5DSluTLajAEg0t7B
TkgKACH3Mc64u1myDR5ReWjtcKqvgSyAPshD67JuT1nvDSh+pY/qkEAngKedAC52
2alcrezyXX7/cbahJL9PPQf0COFI1BRtQiSViYrwGTUw67HwD2Cv4fByXDJQTl S1
efYxgKEc8FaQHV+tdnlcWKSCYePeZer1qmqj7/zWTmTXxCL++xHWkjvJlAbRdmgd
8FS+v88PB+fHzKb8DomauOToEgAcddZGDiXV7h2pXAk9SaJBGZ 9NYlrOar3KL1vR
OYgJvAnchbGFajAJub2yN32Woie6tirHBMxADJIAA3k88tJ2wJ L+Gw==
=lVfP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:58:39 +0000, AceMan <no.sp@m.thanks> wrote:
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:11:45 GMT, realtomargarino@hotmail.com (The
> Regulars) wrote:
>
>>
>>"Kingbarry2000" <kingbarrypublic@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>message:<JJArb.356231$6C4.15149@pd7tw1no>...
>>
>>> Go away
>>
>>At least I'm not a pedafile like you!
>> (Randy says 'Hi!' )
>>
>>
>>cordially, as always,
>>
>>rm
>
> But at least he's not illiterate and knows what a spell-checker is
> huh?
>
> hint: pedafile = paedophile.
>
> got it yet?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3
>
> iQEVAwUBP7CyqRnQJBJ8Dmw5AQF/5ggAmWuiTq4vw2m6/DjU5DSluTLajAEg0t7B
> TkgKACH3Mc64u1myDR5ReWjtcKqvgSyAPshD67JuT1nvDSh+pY/qkEAngKedAC52
> 2alcrezyXX7/cbahJL9PPQf0COFI1BRtQiSViYrwGTUw67HwD2Cv4fByXDJQTl S1
> efYxgKEc8FaQHV+tdnlcWKSCYePeZer1qmqj7/zWTmTXxCL++xHWkjvJlAbRdmgd
> 8FS+v88PB+fHzKb8DomauOToEgAcddZGDiXV7h2pXAk9SaJBGZ 9NYlrOar3KL1vR
> OYgJvAnchbGFajAJub2yN32Woie6tirHBMxADJIAA3k88tJ2wJ L+Gw==
> =lVfP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

So you want to make sure that everyone knows for sure that this
masterpiece came from you and not some other punk troll?

Brilliant. Or is the PGP sig a fake? You know as well as anyone
else that maybe 1 person in 10,000 on the Usenet has the software
to verify this sig.

Killfiled for 90 days for an illegal sig. Put it in your headers.

--
Alan C this post ends with w
q

[f-up]

So anyway, it was like, 11:29 CET Nov 11 2003, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
Alan Connor was all like, "Dude,

> Killfiled for 90 days for an illegal sig. Put it in your headers.

I predict the new vanity header for 2004 to be:

"Alan Connor killfiled me for 90 days and all I got was this stupid header"

--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
12:23:07 up 36 days, 21:26, 8 users, load average: 2.07, 2.08, 2.02
$ cat /dev/bollocks Registered Linux user #261729
scale back-end infrastructures

Alan Connor wrote:

> Brilliant. Or is the PGP sig a fake? You know as well as anyone else
> that maybe 1 person in 10,000 on the Usenet has the software to verify
> this sig.

Perhaps, but if one person spots it, that's enough. I was forged by
some idiot a while ago. He stupidly included the PGP signature, so it
was noticed without even looking at the contents (though that also
revealed it to the regulars).

> Killfiled for 90 days for an illegal sig.

And under what law would that be illegal? Are you going to turn him in
to the police? I think you should learn the difference between law and
netiquette. People like you give those who *politely* uphold netiquette
a bad name. And while we're at it, you broke netiquette yourself. You
cross-posted to multiple groups without setting a Followup-To header,
and you didn't trim the quoted text before sending. What is it they say
about people who live in glass houses?

And just for you, I'm going to break with netiquette, just this once.
My sig is (shock! horror!) 21 lines long (but at least on-topic in
comp.os.linux.advocacy :-))! You may now kill-file me, though I'd
prefer a mature debate.

> Put it in your headers.

That'll only increase bandwidth usage, so why do it? If you don't want
to see it, just set your newsreader to hide it. Or better yet, get the
hell away from Usenet!

Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy

--
PeKaJe

Won't Somebody Please Think Of The Microsoft Shareholder's Children?

The Evil Monopoly will soon be a duopoly of MICROS~1 and MICROS~2 now
that Judge Jackson has made his ruling. Geeks everywhere are shedding
tears of joy, while Microsoft investors are shedding real tears. But not
everybody is ecstatic about the ruling. "It dawned on me today that if
Microsoft is broken up, we won't have anyone to bash anymore. We can
have that," said Rob Graustein, the founder of the new "Save Microsoft
Now! Campaign".

Rob continued, "I know what you're thinking! I have not been
assimilated... er, hired... by Microsoft. I'm not crazy. I haven't been
paid off. My life as a geek revolves around bashing Microsoft. I mean, I
own the world's largest collection of anti-Microsoft T-shirts and
underwear. It's time to take a stand against the elimination of Geek
Enemy #1."

Most observers agree that Mr. Graustein's brain has gone 404. "This guy
is nuts! Support Microsoft? I can't believe I'm hearing this. Even fake
news sites couldn't make up this kind of insanity."

In alt.os.linux.slackware Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:58:39 +0000, AceMan <no.sp@m.thanks> wrote:
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:11:45 GMT, realtomargarino@hotmail.com (The
> > Regulars) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Kingbarry2000" <kingbarrypublic@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >>message:<JJArb.356231$6C4.15149@pd7tw1no>...
> >>
> >>> Go away
> >>
> >>At least I'm not a pedafile like you!
> >> (Randy says 'Hi!' )
> >>
> >>
> >>cordially, as always,
> >>
> >>rm
> >
> > But at least he's not illiterate and knows what a spell-checker is
> > huh?
> >
> > hint: pedafile = paedophile.
> >
> > got it yet?

It seems that "The Regulars" moved from Toronto to Australia
overnite. Either that or "The Regulars" is an imposter.

Gee, we didn't need pgp trash to figure that out either,

cordially, as always,

rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:29:06 GMT, Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote:


>
>So you want to make sure that everyone knows for sure that this
>masterpiece came from you and not some other punk troll?

No, Alan, you stupid piece of toilet trash. I CHOSE to sign that post
because I CAN. This is alt.security.pgp remember asshole?

How many times does that little brain of yours need to be told.....a
PGP sig is a digital signature and does not constitute an illegal
sig. IT IS THERe TO VERIFY THE SENDER you twat!!!


>
>Brilliant. Or is the PGP sig a fake? You know as well as anyone
>else that maybe 1 person in 10,000 on the Usenet has the software
>to verify this sig.

If you bothered to come out of your little hole long enough, you may
realise that there's considerably more people than that using PGP.
Just because you are too stupid to understand the concepts of it all,
don't think everybody has your level of mental retardation.

>
>Killfiled for 90 days for an illegal sig. Put it in your headers.


Whatever you asshole. The sig's not illegal. I won't put it in the
headers. It's staying where it is and I'll sign everyone of my posts
from now on in the hope that you may permanently killfile me.

I'm afraid Alan, you are the weakest link (by a very long
shot)...............GOODBYE!!!

*plonk*

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQEVAwUBP7EpRBnQJBJ8Dmw5AQH+Zwf+Pm65yTX2al/H8pYiB+WQlbsnAkxX71KZ
gkhmGX0iRctp4QOGPSXAYgo33OfPinsRZUPXCJzfCEiEYLt8hl yfF7hI/V8XsWLV
17pf56DQ1SLsEDMBTsG2BRp9n6nxkEb66KsCDYtOE++y84wxSx 0nRgLjtYKxJSIV
BXanad7PqNN+gmFJaDyHFUrNGZm5zPOBmn1RlSD2EMO3VtG+ko XuxTcjR4xZw8ux
CA/pTRzrEW02PEuD23nOxgkRnfDfUYrj3+OjGfFgp8vOF0SGvBtgM wApRkUfrlwP
jcKDM0PY98l/d5iWFDHety7EfOq8M64KmUX304GmACkchmb2zMPxnA==
=cMua
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:23:07 GMT, Randy Myers <rm@whoknows.org> wrote:


>
>Gee, we didn't need pgp trash to figure that out either,
>
>cordially, as always,
>
>rm

No, you mentally retarded fool, but it would have made it easier to
spot from the start wouldn't it, instead of digging around in headers
that are hidden on most people's newsreaders.

Do you really think anyone cares enough anymore about what you have to
say to bother checking whether your posts are real or not?

AceMan writes:

> Whatever you asshole. The sig's not illegal. I won't put it in the
> headers. It's staying where it is and I'll sign everyone of my posts
> from now on in the hope that you may permanently killfile me.

Be careful what you say in signed messages. They may come back to haunt
you.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

"The Regulars" <realtomargarino@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lc_rb.96$It.3646@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
>
> "Kingbarry2000" <kingbarrypublic@hotmail.com> wrote in
message:<JJArb.356231$6C4.15149@pd7tw1no>...
>
> > Go away
>
> At least I'm not a pedafile like you!
> (Randy says 'Hi!' )
>
>
> cordially, as always,
>
> rm
>

I don't think I posted: Go away.


--
This is Usenet. Keep yer head up.