SEO

#1 (**permalink**) 02-18-2008, 06:57 PM

Connor asked a question which has yet to be answered. Why do all
of the pgp signature encrypted posts need pgp signature encryption?

It's a simple question. And yet the pgp trash trolls can't answer
it.

In article <ZZSdna5reKqagi2i4p2dnA@giganews.com> some troll wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:38:37 +0000, MikeyD wrote:

> > As I said, I have a tendency to try and reason with anyone. But even I'm
> > wearing down now, fwiw I just plonked Alan Connor, and I'd imagine others
> > will soon do the same if they haven't already. It'll pass.

> I'm glad you said that Mickey. I've seen some pretty funny trolls
> recently, but 'Alan (Scripts) Connor' has got to be one of the most
> tedious. Plonking though ... it's ultimately self-defeating, best just to
> silently kill the posters you don't want to see. But I know that
> announcing it does bring a certain satisfaction.

> Obi.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Any address shown in the From header is unverified. For more
information about this anonymous remailing service visit:
http://cypherpunks.faithweb.com
This anonymous remailer is a joint project of the Xandra International
Freedom Association.

#2 (**permalink**) 02-18-2008, 06:57 PM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

<anonymous-sender@cypherpunk.mixremailer.com> wrote in message
news:7KYGIP7237936.4221412037@anonymous.poster...
> Connor asked a question which has yet to be answered. Why do all
> of the pgp signature encrypted posts need pgp signature encryption?
>
> It's a simple question. And yet the pgp trash trolls can't answer
> it.

Perhaps because the question lacks a fundamental understanding of
PGP.

For starters, no-one's posts here are encrypted. Were they encrypted
no-one would be able to read it.

Get a clue before trolling in future.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBP7CqeEVuUD0svAWDEQIE/gCgrDDsfTcIEhyREn3E7xITlN6b114AoJm/
xtQ+VYlIgdjlm7g9aEu8O7PM
=Ca1Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

#3 (**permalink**) 02-18-2008, 06:58 PM

> Connor asked a question which has yet to be answered. Why do all
> of the pgp signature encrypted posts need pgp signature encryption?
>
I have answered it many times. If all posts are pgpsigned, it makes it a
lot easier to spot spoofed posts.

#4 (**permalink**) 02-18-2008, 06:58 PM

FYI this came up with a bad signature.
Using GPG 1.21 and kgpg 1.0.0 on Slackware 9.1

#5 (**permalink**) 02-18-2008, 06:58 PM

MikeyD wrote:

> FYI this came up with a bad signature.
> Using GPG 1.21 and kgpg 1.0.0 on Slackware 9.1

Sig looks good to me... gpg 1.21, kgpg 1.0.0

--
-alex49201

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

SEO

Re: Please stop the madness! (cross posted w/follow-up set to empty ng)