Unix Technical Forum

requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

This is a discussion on requirements for a 2.6 kernel? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hi everyone I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a driver forces me to upgrade ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:48 AM
MackS
 
Posts: n/a
Default requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

Hi everyone

I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a
driver forces me to upgrade to 2.6. I would like to know whether the
system I installed (at the time choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use
with a 2.6 kernel. Or do some utilities/system scripts need to be
updated for everything to bo smoothly?

Thanks for any help,

Mack

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:48 AM
Niki Kovacs
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

MackS wrote:

> I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a
> driver forces me to upgrade to 2.6. I would like to know whether the
> system I installed (at the time choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use
> with a 2.6 kernel.


I run 10.2 with a stock 2.6.12 kernel from kernel.org, tuned to my hardware.
Runs nice)

Niki Kovacs
--
I'm not as think as you stoned I am.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:48 AM
Thomas Overgaard
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

MackS wrote:

> I would like to know whether the system I installed (at the time
> choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use with a 2.6 kernel.


Slackware is not only ready for the 2.6 kernel theres a prebuild kernel
2.6.13 ready to download from the /testing tree.

Warning: If you are using another kernel than the default kernel bare.i
then installing kernel-2.6.13 will overwrite kernel-2.4.31

Find your nearest mirror here:
<URL: http://www.slackware.com/getslack/>

Remember to read this file README.initrd, you'll find it in the same
directory as the kernelpackages.
--
Thomas O.

This area is designed to become quite warm during normal operation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:48 AM
Keith Keller
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

In article <1130524309.279080.223470@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com>, MackS wrote:
>
> I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a
> driver forces me to upgrade to 2.6. I would like to know whether the
> system I installed (at the time choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use
> with a 2.6 kernel. Or do some utilities/system scripts need to be
> updated for everything to bo smoothly?


It should work fine. The only hitch I had was that the 2.6 kernel
was probing udev, which I hadn't configured under 2.4. Uninstalling
the udev package in this case should fix the problem.

I used both the stock Slackware kernel and a custom-built kernel
on 10.0, and they work great. So you should really have no
problems with 10.2 and 2.6.

--keith

--
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom
see X- headers for PGP signature information

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:48 AM
Grant
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

On 28 Oct 2005 11:31:49 -0700, "MackS" <mackstevenson@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a
>driver forces me to upgrade to 2.6. I would like to know whether the
>system I installed (at the time choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use
>with a 2.6 kernel. Or do some utilities/system scripts need to be
>updated for everything to bo smoothly?


It depends, on desktop hardware disabling udev does the trick, on
laptops new tools are required for 2.6.13+ --> pcmciautils and friends.

Slack-10.2 doesn't yet have these updated tools... CardBus is fine,
older stuff? YMMV... I don't use slack's 2.6 kernels, since the
system is up and running try compiling your own kernel...

I'm biased though, always found it easier to compile a new kernel
than to figure out how to use initramfs )

/boot/README.initrd points at something worth reading, perhaps.

Grant.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:48 AM
MackS
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

Hi guys


> It depends, on desktop hardware disabling udev does the trick,


Thank you for your help on this. But you are telling me that I
*disable* udev? I thought that I actually had to install that for use
with 2.6.

Thanks for clarifying this

Mack

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:48 AM
Vasilis Papavasileiou
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

MackS wrote:
> Hi guys
>
>
>
>>It depends, on desktop hardware disabling udev does the trick,

>
>
> Thank you for your help on this. But you are telling me that I
> *disable* udev? I thought that I actually had to install that for use
> with 2.6.
>
> Thanks for clarifying this
>
> Mack
>

Devfs support was removed from the 2.6.13 kernel. So i think you have to
use udev for 2.6.13.* or 2.6.14. Everything has worked smoothly for me
so far. Just make sure the package is installed and the
/etc/rc.d/rc.udev file is executable.

Vasilis
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:49 AM
Joost Kremers
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: requirements for a 2.6 kernel?

Vasilis Papavasileiou wrote:
> Devfs support was removed from the 2.6.13 kernel. So i think you have to
> use udev for 2.6.13.* or 2.6.14.


either that, or use a static /dev directory, as in the old days.

personally, i think udev is a great idea, and the only trouble i had
getting it to work was because i forgot to compile support for it in into
the kernel...

> Everything has worked smoothly for me
> so far. Just make sure the package is installed and the
> /etc/rc.d/rc.udev file is executable.


yup, that should do it. then go and read
<http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html> to learn how to set up
persistent device naming for removable devices.

--
Joost Kremers joostkremers@yahoo.com
Selbst in die Unterwelt dringt durch Spalten Licht
EN:SiS(9
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com