This is a discussion on requirements for a 2.6 kernel? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hi everyone I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a driver forces me to upgrade ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi everyone I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a driver forces me to upgrade to 2.6. I would like to know whether the system I installed (at the time choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use with a 2.6 kernel. Or do some utilities/system scripts need to be updated for everything to bo smoothly? Thanks for any help, Mack |
| |||
| MackS wrote: > I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a > driver forces me to upgrade to 2.6. I would like to know whether the > system I installed (at the time choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use > with a 2.6 kernel. I run 10.2 with a stock 2.6.12 kernel from kernel.org, tuned to my hardware. Runs nice Niki Kovacs -- I'm not as think as you stoned I am. |
| |||
| MackS wrote: > I would like to know whether the system I installed (at the time > choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use with a 2.6 kernel. Slackware is not only ready for the 2.6 kernel theres a prebuild kernel 2.6.13 ready to download from the /testing tree. Warning: If you are using another kernel than the default kernel bare.i then installing kernel-2.6.13 will overwrite kernel-2.4.31 Find your nearest mirror here: <URL: http://www.slackware.com/getslack/> Remember to read this file README.initrd, you'll find it in the same directory as the kernelpackages. -- Thomas O. This area is designed to become quite warm during normal operation. |
| |||
| In article <1130524309.279080.223470@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com>, MackS wrote: > > I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a > driver forces me to upgrade to 2.6. I would like to know whether the > system I installed (at the time choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use > with a 2.6 kernel. Or do some utilities/system scripts need to be > updated for everything to bo smoothly? It should work fine. The only hitch I had was that the 2.6 kernel was probing udev, which I hadn't configured under 2.4. Uninstalling the udev package in this case should fix the problem. I used both the stock Slackware kernel and a custom-built kernel on 10.0, and they work great. So you should really have no problems with 10.2 and 2.6. --keith -- kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us (try just my userid to email me) AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom see X- headers for PGP signature information |
| |||
| On 28 Oct 2005 11:31:49 -0700, "MackS" <mackstevenson@hotmail.com> wrote: >I installed slackware 10.2 with the default 2.4.31 kernel, but now a >driver forces me to upgrade to 2.6. I would like to know whether the >system I installed (at the time choosing a 2.4 kernel) is ready for use >with a 2.6 kernel. Or do some utilities/system scripts need to be >updated for everything to bo smoothly? It depends, on desktop hardware disabling udev does the trick, on laptops new tools are required for 2.6.13+ --> pcmciautils and friends. Slack-10.2 doesn't yet have these updated tools... CardBus is fine, older stuff? YMMV... I don't use slack's 2.6 kernels, since the system is up and running try compiling your own kernel... I'm biased though, always found it easier to compile a new kernel than to figure out how to use initramfs /boot/README.initrd points at something worth reading, perhaps. Grant. |
| |||
| Hi guys > It depends, on desktop hardware disabling udev does the trick, Thank you for your help on this. But you are telling me that I *disable* udev? I thought that I actually had to install that for use with 2.6. Thanks for clarifying this Mack |
| |||
| MackS wrote: > Hi guys > > > >>It depends, on desktop hardware disabling udev does the trick, > > > Thank you for your help on this. But you are telling me that I > *disable* udev? I thought that I actually had to install that for use > with 2.6. > > Thanks for clarifying this > > Mack > Devfs support was removed from the 2.6.13 kernel. So i think you have to use udev for 2.6.13.* or 2.6.14. Everything has worked smoothly for me so far. Just make sure the package is installed and the /etc/rc.d/rc.udev file is executable. Vasilis |
| ||||
| Vasilis Papavasileiou wrote: > Devfs support was removed from the 2.6.13 kernel. So i think you have to > use udev for 2.6.13.* or 2.6.14. either that, or use a static /dev directory, as in the old days. personally, i think udev is a great idea, and the only trouble i had getting it to work was because i forgot to compile support for it in into the kernel... > Everything has worked smoothly for me > so far. Just make sure the package is installed and the > /etc/rc.d/rc.udev file is executable. yup, that should do it. then go and read <http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html> to learn how to set up persistent device naming for removable devices. -- Joost Kremers joostkremers@yahoo.com Selbst in die Unterwelt dringt durch Spalten Licht EN:SiS(9 |