SEO

Has www.slackware.com simply disappeared? Their registered nameservers
cannot resolve the name.

Dave Uhring <daveuhring@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Has www.slackware.com simply disappeared? Their registered nameservers
> cannot resolve the name.

I'm not having any problems getting to it.

- Kurt

Nope, CWO have DNS issues



On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Dave Uhring wrote:

>
> Has www.slackware.com simply disappeared? Their registered nameservers
> cannot resolve the name.
>

--
Cheers
Res

mysql> update auth set Framed-IP-Address='127.0.0.127' where user= 'troll';
~# radzap troll

*had* issues, they are both back now
previously they wouldnt respond for even thier own domain


On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Res wrote:

> Nope, CWO have DNS issues
>
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Dave Uhring wrote:
>
>>
>> Has www.slackware.com simply disappeared? Their registered nameservers
>> cannot resolve the name.
>>
>
>

--
Cheers
Res

mysql> update auth set Framed-IP-Address='127.0.0.127' where user= 'troll';
~# radzap troll

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:11:53 +1000, Res wrote:

> *had* issues, they are both back now
> previously they wouldnt respond for even thier own domain

That's why *two* DNS servers are required. Taking both of them down at
the same time is really stupid.

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:57:29 -0000, Dave Uhring <daveuhring@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Has www.slackware.com simply disappeared? Their registered nameservers
>cannot resolve the name.

Works from here

--Grant.
--
http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:53:57 +1100, Grant wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:57:29 -0000, Dave Uhring <daveuhring@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Has www.slackware.com simply disappeared? Their registered nameservers
>>cannot resolve the name.
>
> Works from here

Works here now, too. See 2d article in this thread by Res.

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Dave Uhring wrote:

>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:11:53 +1000, Res wrote:
>
>> *had* issues, they are both back now
>> previously they wouldnt respond for even thier own domain
>
> That's why *two* DNS servers are required. Taking both of them down at
> the same time is really stupid.

Yes, but it might also have been their total data center that had an
outage, thats one thing we dont know, as at the time, I did not know its
IP to test that side of things


--
Cheers
Res

mysql> update auth set Framed-IP-Address='127.0.0.127' where user= 'troll';
~# radzap troll

On 2007-12-10, Res <res@ausics.net> wrote:
>
> Yes, but it might also have been their total data center that had an
> outage, thats one thing we dont know, as at the time, I did not know its
> IP to test that side of things

Nameservers are supposed to be on two different physical networks; it
seems clear to me that CWO's are not. If nobody volunteers, perhaps
I'll email Pat and see if he has plans for adding a nameserver on a
different network.

--keith

--
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information

On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Keith Keller wrote:

>
> On 2007-12-10, Res <res@ausics.net> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but it might also have been their total data center that had an
>> outage, thats one thing we dont know, as at the time, I did not know its
>> IP to test that side of things
>
> Nameservers are supposed to be on two different physical networks; it
> seems clear to me that CWO's are not. If nobody volunteers, perhaps
> I'll email Pat and see if he has plans for adding a nameserver on a
> different network.

What they are supposed to have and do have has always widely differed,
especially for small companies, be they ISP/ASP/OSP's or just another
commercial business carrying on its trade.

What's worse is the scary number of them that in order to satisfy
registrars, have primary and secondary on the same damn machine.
Typical of RH users. We even offered a colo who we found out once did
it to give him free secondary on one of ours, his reponse was typical of a
RH'r "so do i get root?" my *thoughts (not said out loud was)*
"you can get rooted" :P actual statement was *gigling* "umm no" he said,
"oh ok, no thanks". *sigh* subsequently he had problems every week,
because he was a tinkerer and managed to somehow drop his interfaces all
the time or even firewall himself off haha, we tolerated him for about 2
months before suggesting he should get someone competant to run his
server He did not like being told that, but you knew that he knew we
were right, a week later he did, and we never heard a peep out of them
since.


--
Cheers
Res

mysql> update auth set Framed-IP-Address='127.0.0.127' where user= 'troll';
~# radzap troll