Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:15 AM
edward hage
 
Posts: n/a
Default slackware installation using NFS fails

Currently in want to install Slackware Linux version 3.3.0 based around
the 2.0.30 Linux kernel on an old 468DX2 computer using NFS. My server
is a Linux machine running on Suse 8.2 (kernel 2.4.20). The situation
now is that I only can install the boot and root-floppy and can run setup.

The problem that I encounter is that the connection is poor, sometimes
contact and sometimes not. Also ping gives a lot of package loss (from
75% to 100%).

My question: How can I solve this, has this to do with low linux kernel
on client-machine? Or has this to do with the fact that the client
ethernet-card is 10 MBits (and server 100 MBits)?


INFO SERVERSIDE:
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100024 1 udp 1028 status
100024 1 tcp 2383 status
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 3 udp 2049 nfs
100021 1 udp 1029 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 1029 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 1029 nlockmgr
100005 1 udp 1030 mountd
100005 1 tcp 3654 mountd
100005 2 udp 1030 mountd
100005 2 tcp 3654 mountd
100005 3 udp 1030 mountd
100005 3 tcp 3654 mountd

INFO CLIENTSIDE:
1) ifconfig eth0 installed
2) setup started which mounts NFS, when exited it is dismounted (?)
because I don't see it mounted anymore.
3) Manually mounts okay (only after I use setup, probably starts the
portmap which by the way I can not do manually):
192.168.x.x:/dir on /nfs type nfs
(rw,hard,intr,rsize=1024,wsize=1024,addr=192.168.x .x)
4) cd /nfs
5) ls -l, sometimes works, sometimes not
message:
NFS server 192.168.x.x not responding, still trying.
NFS server 192.168.x.x OK.

Can anybody help me out?
Thanks. Edward

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:15 AM
Rich Grise
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: slackware installation using NFS fails

on 2004-03-07, in <404afde6$0$570$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
these words of wisdom from edward hage did appear:
> Currently in want to install Slackware Linux version 3.3.0 based around
> the 2.0.30 Linux kernel on an old 468DX2 computer using NFS. My server
> is a Linux machine running on Suse 8.2 (kernel 2.4.20). The situation
> now is that I only can install the boot and root-floppy and can run setup.
>
> The problem that I encounter is that the connection is poor, sometimes
> contact and sometimes not. Also ping gives a lot of package loss (from
> 75% to 100%).
>
> My question: How can I solve this, has this to do with low linux kernel
> on client-machine? Or has this to do with the fact that the client
> ethernet-card is 10 MBits (and server 100 MBits)?


(b). If you can't set them both to auto, then set them first both
to 10 mbps half, then 10 mbps full, then 100 mbps half, etc.
Where it breaks up, back up one.

I'm sorry I can't give you a reference; I picked it up in one of the
posts I read while scanning the newsgroup(s). :-)

Good Luck!
Rich

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:16 AM
Rich Grise
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: slackware installation using NFS fails

on 2004-03-07, in <404afde6$0$570$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
these words of wisdom from edward hage did appear:
> Currently in want to install Slackware Linux version 3.3.0 based around
> the 2.0.30 Linux kernel on an old 468DX2 computer using NFS. My server
> is a Linux machine running on Suse 8.2 (kernel 2.4.20). The situation
> now is that I only can install the boot and root-floppy and can run setup.



Why so old? Just because you have an old machine doesn't mean you have to
install old Slack. I've got 9.1, kernel 2.4.22, running on a Cyrix 6X86 P150;
and I can't think of any reason it wouldn't work just fine on any old 486.


>
> The problem that I encounter is that the connection is poor, sometimes
> contact and sometimes not. Also ping gives a lot of package loss (from
> 75% to 100%).
>
> My question: How can I solve this, has this to do with low linux kernel
> on client-machine? Or has this to do with the fact that the client
> ethernet-card is 10 MBits (and server 100 MBits)?



I thought I had already answered this - if they don't both have an "auto"
option, then set them both to 10MBPS half-duplex, and make it go. If it
won't go, then something's busted. If it does, then up it to 10 MBps
full-duplex, and so on. When it breaks, back up one.

Good Luck!
Rich

>
> Can anybody help me out?
> Thanks. Edward
>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:16 AM
Leonard the Committed
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: slackware installation using NFS fails

On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 11:57:30 +0000, Rich Grise wrote:

> on 2004-03-07, in <404afde6$0$570$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
> these words of wisdom from edward hage did appear:
>> Currently in want to install Slackware Linux version 3.3.0 based around
>> the 2.0.30 Linux kernel on an old 468DX2 computer using NFS. My server
>> is a Linux machine running on Suse 8.2 (kernel 2.4.20). The situation
>> now is that I only can install the boot and root-floppy and can run setup.
>>
>> The problem that I encounter is that the connection is poor, sometimes
>> contact and sometimes not. Also ping gives a lot of package loss (from
>> 75% to 100%).
>>
>> My question: How can I solve this, has this to do with low linux kernel
>> on client-machine? Or has this to do with the fact that the client
>> ethernet-card is 10 MBits (and server 100 MBits)?

>
> (b). If you can't set them both to auto, then set them first both
> to 10 mbps half, then 10 mbps full, then 100 mbps half, etc.
> Where it breaks up, back up one.
>
> I'm sorry I can't give you a reference; I picked it up in one of the
> posts I read while scanning the newsgroup(s). :-)
>
> Good Luck!
> Rich


I'd be more inclined to think there's either a bad nic card or cable in
the mix. I've mixed 10 and 100 without trouble for years.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:16 AM
edward hage
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: slackware installation using NFS fails

Thanks for the reply Rich,

How can I set them to 10 MBits half-duplex. Is this a setting for the
router? I couldn't find this in the manual. I do know that a LED
indicates that the connection is 10 MBPS or 100 MBPS. So the router must
'know' that the old computer is 10 MBits and the new computer 100 MBits.
But maybe the new computer doesn't know this abou the old one, or am I
not making sense now !

By the way. I tried an old Slackware version because I could not get a
newer version booted. I ran into trouble when I got the bootdisk or the
root-disk in (the computer just hang). Vs. 3.6 of slackware seemed to
work for mcd.i + color.gz but for NFS I need the net.i boot and when I
used this the root-disk color.gz hang on me.

I have an old CD-player that is not capable of reading CD-R's so that's
why the choice for NFS setup.

greetings

Rich Grise wrote:
> on 2004-03-07, in <404afde6$0$570$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
> these words of wisdom from edward hage did appear:
>
>>Currently in want to install Slackware Linux version 3.3.0 based around
>>the 2.0.30 Linux kernel on an old 468DX2 computer using NFS. My server
>>is a Linux machine running on Suse 8.2 (kernel 2.4.20). The situation
>>now is that I only can install the boot and root-floppy and can run setup.

>
>
>
> Why so old? Just because you have an old machine doesn't mean you have to
> install old Slack. I've got 9.1, kernel 2.4.22, running on a Cyrix 6X86 P150;
> and I can't think of any reason it wouldn't work just fine on any old 486.
>
>
>
>>The problem that I encounter is that the connection is poor, sometimes
>>contact and sometimes not. Also ping gives a lot of package loss (from
>>75% to 100%).
>>
>>My question: How can I solve this, has this to do with low linux kernel
>>on client-machine? Or has this to do with the fact that the client
>>ethernet-card is 10 MBits (and server 100 MBits)?

>
>
>
> I thought I had already answered this - if they don't both have an "auto"
> option, then set them both to 10MBPS half-duplex, and make it go. If it
> won't go, then something's busted. If it does, then up it to 10 MBps
> full-duplex, and so on. When it breaks, back up one.
>
> Good Luck!
> Rich
>
>
>>Can anybody help me out?
>>Thanks. Edward
>>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:16 AM
edward hage
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: slackware installation using NFS fails

Did some research on the internet and discovered the mii-tool. I think
you meant this tool when you advised to alter the connection.

My new computer had 100baseTx-FD flow-control (link ok) and I forced it
to 10baseT-HD.
Pinging and NFS connection still the same result, bad connection.

Strange thing is that pinging from my router (192.168.0.1) to the old
computer (.3) with packages of 32 bytes is okay and from the new
computer (.2) is bad.

Can anybody give me some new insights about this. I am running out of
options (good pinging from .1 to .3 excludes bad cable I think!).



edward hage wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Rich,
>
> How can I set them to 10 MBits half-duplex. Is this a setting for the
> router? I couldn't find this in the manual. I do know that a LED
> indicates that the connection is 10 MBPS or 100 MBPS. So the router must
> 'know' that the old computer is 10 MBits and the new computer 100 MBits.
> But maybe the new computer doesn't know this abou the old one, or am I
> not making sense now !
>
> By the way. I tried an old Slackware version because I could not get a
> newer version booted. I ran into trouble when I got the bootdisk or the
> root-disk in (the computer just hang). Vs. 3.6 of slackware seemed to
> work for mcd.i + color.gz but for NFS I need the net.i boot and when I
> used this the root-disk color.gz hang on me.
>
> I have an old CD-player that is not capable of reading CD-R's so that's
> why the choice for NFS setup.
>
> greetings
>
> Rich Grise wrote:
>
>> on 2004-03-07, in <404afde6$0$570$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
>> these words of wisdom from edward hage did appear:
>>
>>> Currently in want to install Slackware Linux version 3.3.0 based
>>> around the 2.0.30 Linux kernel on an old 468DX2 computer using NFS.
>>> My server is a Linux machine running on Suse 8.2 (kernel 2.4.20). The
>>> situation now is that I only can install the boot and root-floppy and
>>> can run setup.

>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Why so old? Just because you have an old machine doesn't mean you have to
>> install old Slack. I've got 9.1, kernel 2.4.22, running on a Cyrix
>> 6X86 P150;
>> and I can't think of any reason it wouldn't work just fine on any old
>> 486.
>>
>>
>>
>>> The problem that I encounter is that the connection is poor,
>>> sometimes contact and sometimes not. Also ping gives a lot of package
>>> loss (from 75% to 100%).
>>>
>>> My question: How can I solve this, has this to do with low linux
>>> kernel on client-machine? Or has this to do with the fact that the
>>> client ethernet-card is 10 MBits (and server 100 MBits)?

>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I thought I had already answered this - if they don't both have an "auto"
>> option, then set them both to 10MBPS half-duplex, and make it go. If it
>> won't go, then something's busted. If it does, then up it to 10 MBps
>> full-duplex, and so on. When it breaks, back up one.
>>
>> Good Luck!
>> Rich
>>
>>
>>> Can anybody help me out?
>>> Thanks. Edward
>>>

>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:16 AM
Alan Hicks
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: slackware installation using NFS fails

In alt.os.linux.slackware, edward hage dared to utter,
> Strange thing is that pinging from my router (192.168.0.1) to the old
> computer (.3) with packages of 32 bytes is okay and from the new
> computer (.2) is bad.
>
> Can anybody give me some new insights about this. I am running out of
> options (good pinging from .1 to .3 excludes bad cable I think!).


Firewall.

man iptables

Search for the list and flush options.

--
It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
Ecclesiastes 7:5
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788