This is a discussion on Slackware on older machine within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Chaps, does from your experience would slackware 12.0 with Xfce (?spelling) be a reasonable runner on a K6 233 ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Chaps, does from your experience would slackware 12.0 with Xfce (?spelling) be a reasonable runner on a K6 233 with 128MB ram? Suspect Openoffice would be a bit too heavy for this machine. Not sure about Koffice, suspect Abiword may be a go-er. Of course I could install an older Slack - but the word processing side has come on leaps and bounds in recent years. Did look at Damn-Small-Linux but didn't like the look of its windowmanager. I beleive Windowmaker may have a small footprint but I suspect that might be a bit harder to get on with for my father - the intended user. Either that or a 286 with WordPerfect 5.1 - but that would be great until someone wanted to print and I've thrown out all my old IDE network cards! BTW - just about to put the keyboard (16 years old) onto this machine as the old keyboard has lettering and a nice feel whereas this modern cheap one (most expensive wired keyboard from the supplier at a fiver) has half the letters worn off! Pete -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
| |||
| Peter Chant wrote: >does from your experience would slackware 12.0 with Xfce (?spelling) be a >reasonable runner on a K6 233 with 128MB ram? A lot depends on your own definition of "reasonable." The good news is that you can test this yourself by running a live CD such as Slax or Knoppix. (Knoppix is fine for testing speedyness; distros with the same kernel and window manager don't have large differences in speed.) Memory for such systems is cheap, so I would advise bringing it up to 256K or 512K if the motherboard can handle larger memory sticks. -- Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/> |
| |||
| Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/> wrote: > A lot depends on your own definition of "reasonable." The good news > is that you can test this yourself by running a live CD such as > Slax or Knoppix. (Knoppix is fine for testing speedyness; distros > with the same kernel and window manager don't have large differences > in speed.) > > Memory for such systems is cheap, so I would advise bringing it up > to 256K or 512K if the motherboard can handle larger memory sticks. > It is also obsolete. Shock horror - if it is 72pin EDO I can buy 64MB for a £11! Still probably not worth spending money - more economic to scrounge a newer machine. Can't remember which type of memory it uses but it uses two sorts - one that was just coming in at the time and an older technology. 128MB is the maximum for the newer type of memory. I'll install to hard drive, as I have a hard drive in the box and a live distro off of a 4x cdrom would be painful! Actually the 4x drive is rather slow for the age of the machine but the newer 50x drive I had in there failed and my old 4x never let me down. -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
| ||||
| Peter Chant wrote: > £11! Still probably not worth spending money - more economic to scrounge > a newer machine. Hmm, just have done! -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |