This is a discussion on Xorg very slow vs XFree86 3.3.6 within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hi. I've 2 identical old Compaq laptops. On one I've got Slack 8.1 with XFree86 3.3.6 and on the ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi. I've 2 identical old Compaq laptops. On one I've got Slack 8.1 with XFree86 3.3.6 and on the other, Slack 10 with Xorg (the one that comes with it). The XFree86 takes 7 secs to load, whereas Xorg takes 30 secs (to the same window manager). Any ideas, anyone? I may dump Xorg and go back to XFree86. What was the problem with XFree86 that caused Patrick to change? Regards: Jim Ford |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Ford wrote: > Hi. > > I've 2 identical old Compaq laptops. On one I've got Slack 8.1 with > XFree86 3.3.6 and on the other, Slack 10 with Xorg (the one that comes > with it). The XFree86 takes 7 secs to load, whereas Xorg takes 30 secs (to > the same window manager). Any ideas, anyone? I may dump Xorg and go back > to XFree86. What was the problem with XFree86 that caused Patrick to > change? Xfree86 3.3.6 is quite an old version. You'll probably find similar slow down with XFree86 4.4.0 (or what ever the current stable release is). In fact, isn't X.org based on the last XFree86 release before the licence change anyway? Blumf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA68SLMid3IcxolsoRAogRAJ0X3Laa280wACr7Gi/Dt8cDXHZxhQCfUPm/ bgAZfCuyMMrdZWwhC6W5MC0= =3GDo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| "Blumf" <blumf@hot.mail.com> wrote: > Xfree86 3.3.6 is quite an old version. You'll probably find similar slow > down with XFree86 4.4.0 (or what ever the current stable release is). In > fact, isn't X.org based on the last XFree86 release before the licence > change anyway? Yes, from what i've heard it's (almost) exactly the same. Jim, You might want to check your video driver. Run xorgsetup to autodetect your display settings. Hope this helps. -- Martijn. |
| |||
| On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:25:25 +0000, Jim Ford wrote: > I've 2 identical old Compaq laptops. On one I've got Slack 8.1 with XFree86 > 3.3.6 and on the other, Slack 10 with Xorg (the one that comes with it). The > XFree86 takes 7 secs to load, whereas Xorg takes 30 secs (to the same window > manager). Any ideas, anyone? What makes you think X11 is the cause of this problem? 3 other things have changed since 8.1: 1.) glibc; 2.) kernel version; and 3.) just about everything else. Any of 1, 2, or 3 could also have contributed to the slowdown. If you want to try to fix it, do some investigating. See if you can identify what's taking so long during startx. > I may dump Xorg and go back to XFree86. You will not find this to be an easy task. You may have to compile EVERYTHING from scratch. I tried 9.1's XFree86 4.3.0 on a -current install a few months back, and everything was broken. Perhaps you should consider leaving these machines on 8.1. > What was the problem with XFree86 that caused Patrick to change? He wrote about it extensively in the ChangeLog. -- /dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply |
| |||
| On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:32:48 -0500, /dev/rob0 <rob0@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:25:25 +0000, Jim Ford wrote: > >> What was the problem with XFree86 that caused Patrick to change? > > He wrote about it extensively in the ChangeLog. FWIW, I've added this to the FAQ: <http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/faqomatic/cache/121.html> -- Mark Hill <mrhill@gmail.com> |
| ||||
| On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:38:21 +0000, Blumf wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jim Ford wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I've 2 identical old Compaq laptops. On one I've got Slack 8.1 with >> XFree86 3.3.6 and on the other, Slack 10 with Xorg (the one that comes >> with it). The XFree86 takes 7 secs to load, whereas Xorg takes 30 secs (to >> the same window manager). Any ideas, anyone? I may dump Xorg and go back >> to XFree86. What was the problem with XFree86 that caused Patrick to >> change? > > Xfree86 3.3.6 is quite an old version. You'll probably find similar slow > down with XFree86 4.4.0 (or what ever the current stable release is). In > fact, isn't X.org based on the last XFree86 release before the licence > change anyway? > > Blumf > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFA68SLMid3IcxolsoRAogRAJ0X3Laa280wACr7Gi/Dt8cDXHZxhQCfUPm/ > bgAZfCuyMMrdZWwhC6W5MC0= > =3GDo > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Apparently the size of the xorg config file has an effect on the time it takes to startup. |