Unix Technical Forum

am I stuck with 2.4.20 forever?

This is a discussion on am I stuck with 2.4.20 forever? within the Gentoo Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hello there! I'm frustrated. I'm running a 2.4.20 kernel on a Gentoo Linux box. On this kernel, APM and ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Gentoo Linux Support

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 06:37 AM
Oli Scheit
 
Posts: n/a
Default am I stuck with 2.4.20 forever?

Hello there!

I'm frustrated.
I'm running a 2.4.20 kernel on a Gentoo Linux box.
On this kernel, APM and ACPI is build in.
When I pass pci=noacpi to the kernel at boot-time,
everything works fine.
When I don't pass it, my network card will not work.
When I exclude ACPI from the kernel, my HDs will
loose the interrupt at boot time.

So far so good. I used pci=noacpi in the past and
used to be satisfied with that.

Now I wanted to upgrade to kernel 2.4.23.
Different story.
When I exclude ACPI from the kernel, my HDs will
loose the interrupt -> no booting possible.
When I include it and pass pci=noacpi to it at boot-time,
the HDs will loose the interrupt -> no booting possible.
When I just simply boot, with acpi built into the
kernel, the HDs work fine - but my network card gets
assigned to interrupt 19 and does not work.

I don't have any ideas left.
Any help would be highly appreciated.

regards,
Oli

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 06:37 AM
walt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: am I stuck with 2.4.20 forever?

Oli Scheit <oli@scheit.de> writes:

> Hello there!
>
> I'm frustrated.


Playing with computers is perfect for you, then.

> When I just simply boot, with acpi built into the
> kernel, the HDs work fine - but my network card gets
> assigned to interrupt 19 and does not work.


I don't know what is wrong either, but I would try
changing some settings in the BIOS setup, like
Plug-n-play-aware-OS or ACPI-aware-OS. If you
don't have such settings in your BIOS config then
perhaps your motherboard is too old for such things?

Is there a BIOS upgrade available for your motherboard?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 06:37 AM
Oli Scheit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: am I stuck with 2.4.20 forever?

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:24:55 -0800, walt wrote:

>> I'm frustrated.

>
> Playing with computers is perfect for you, then.


Uhm. Yeah. Guess so. :-))

> I don't know what is wrong either, but I would try
> changing some settings in the BIOS setup, like
> Plug-n-play-aware-OS or ACPI-aware-OS. If you
> don't have such settings in your BIOS config then
> perhaps your motherboard is too old for such things?


Not to old, but simply to cheap. It's a ASRock K7S8X.
I believe when I entered the BIOS for the very first time,
there _was_ an option to enable/disable PnP-OS. But
now no more. Seems to be a one-time-choice...

> Is there a BIOS upgrade available for your motherboard?


I guess there is a newer one. They don't sayanything about
acpi or such things in the changelog but I might as well
give it a try.

Thanks,
Oli

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 06:37 AM
olli1079@compuserve.de
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: am I stuck with 2.4.20 forever?


Do your hardware support sharing irq?

Did you enabled this in your kernel?
(CONFIG_IDEPCI_SHARE_IRQ)

--
Gruß Stefan
-

Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence. Dijkstra
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 06:37 AM
Oli Scheit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: am I stuck with 2.4.20 forever?

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:37:10 +0100, Oli Scheit wrote:

For the record:
it was my own fault. I forgot to rebuild and install
the appropriate wlan-ng driver to the new
/lib/modules/NEW_KERNEL_VERSION/net directory.
I misinterpreted the error messages from dmesg.
It said it couldn't load the driver.
I thought the error came up because the hardware
didn't work.
But it came up because the driver wasn't there.
DOH!
Next time I'll belive.

BTW: I'm writing this under kernel 2.4.23 :-)

Thanks for the help.

regards,
Oli
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com