SEO

I've been trying for a week now, updating sources every day
and I'm still getting this error on two different Athlon boxes:
-------------
.../../unxlngi4.pro/bin/mksvconf ../../unxlngi4.pro/inc/svconf.h
char = signed char
short = signed short
int = signed int
long = signed long
sizeof(char) = 1
sizeof(short) = 2
sizeof(int) = 4
sizeof(long) = 4
sizeof(float) = 4
sizeof(double) = 8
sizeof(void *) = 4
LITTLEENDIAN (Intel, VAX, PowerPC)
Stack waechst nach unten
STACKALIGNMENT : 1
can not read address (nil)
Segmentation fault
dmake: Error code 139, while making '../../unxlngi4.pro/inc/svconf.h'
dmake: '../../unxlngi4.pro/inc/svconf.h' removed.
---* TG_SLO.MK *----

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/tools/source/solar

!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-1.1.0 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 453, Exitcode 1

I have tried different CFLAGS and USE flags with the same result
each time. This latest try was with NO CFLAGS and NO USE flags
defined. Still the same error every time.

Anyone else?

On 26 Oct 2003 18:01:08 -0800, walt <wa1ter@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I've been trying for a week now, updating sources every day
>and I'm still getting this error on two different Athlon boxes:

I have build OO 1.1 on my Athlon XP system. Did not see any problems.

joe@blahblah.invalid (Joe Dunning) writes:

> On 26 Oct 2003 18:01:08 -0800, walt <wa1ter@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >I've been trying for a week now, updating sources every day
> >and I'm still getting this error on two different Athlon boxes:
>
> I have build OO 1.1 on my Athlon XP system. Did not see any problems.

Could I ask you to post your CFLAGS and USE flags for me? I'm at
the end of my debugging skills with this one.

Also, what does your /etc/make.profile point to? What does
'gcc -v' say?

Thanks!

Worked for me on Athlon MP dual system. I just use -march=athlon-mp -O3
-pipe. I believe O3 covers a lot of the stuff people add anyway and it's
safe and works. I figure if the system doesn't run the compile
optimizations don't do you much good <G>.


walt wrote:

> I've been trying for a week now, updating sources every day
> and I'm still getting this error on two different Athlon boxes:
> -------------
> I have tried different CFLAGS and USE flags with the same result
> each time. This latest try was with NO CFLAGS and NO USE flags
> defined. Still the same error every time.
>
> Anyone else?

--
Brett I. Holcomb
brettholcomb@R777charter.net
AKA Grunt <><
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email

walt <wa1ter@hotmail.com> writes:

> I've been trying for a week now, updating sources every day
> and I'm still getting this error on two different Athlon boxes:
> -------------
> ../../unxlngi4.pro/bin/mksvconf ../../unxlngi4.pro/inc/svconf.h
> char = signed char
> short = signed short
> int = signed int
> long = signed long
> sizeof(char) = 1
> sizeof(short) = 2
> sizeof(int) = 4
> sizeof(long) = 4
> sizeof(float) = 4
> sizeof(double) = 8
> sizeof(void *) = 4
> LITTLEENDIAN (Intel, VAX, PowerPC)
> Stack waechst nach unten
> STACKALIGNMENT : 1
> can not read address (nil)
> Segmentation fault
> dmake: Error code 139, while making '../../unxlngi4.pro/inc/svconf.h'
> dmake: '../../unxlngi4.pro/inc/svconf.h' removed.
> ---* TG_SLO.MK *----
>
> ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-1.1.0/work/oo_1.1_src/tools/source/solar
>
> !!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-1.1.0 failed.

Well, I think I just found the answer: I routinely run kernel 2.6x nowadays,
and there is a patch that appears to be for my problem but it is only
referenced in the ebuild for openoffice-1.1.0-r1, not for plain 1.1

I won't know for certain until tomorrow morning, of course ;0)

walt <wa1ter@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I've been trying for a week now, updating sources every day
> and I'm still getting this error on two different Athlon boxes:

This may sound stupid, but ist your /var large enough? The emerge of
OO blew up on me several times with obscure errors, until I found out
that my /var (at 1.8GB) was too small. When I made it 3GB, OO 1.1
built fine.

OTOH, I (finally) built OpenOffice on my third day with Gentoo Linux,
so the problem may have been a newbie error.

Wolfgang
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"spamtrap" is a valid address. For faster response, write to "rupp".
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Wolfgang Rupp <spamtrap@coredump.at> writes:

> walt <wa1ter@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I've been trying for a week now, updating sources every day
> > and I'm still getting this error on two different Athlon boxes:
>
> This may sound stupid, but ist your /var large enough? The emerge of
> OO blew up on me several times with obscure errors, until I found out
> that my /var (at 1.8GB) was too small. When I made it 3GB, OO 1.1
> built fine.
>
> OTOH, I (finally) built OpenOffice on my third day with Gentoo Linux,
> so the problem may have been a newbie error.

The problem was that I run kernel 2.6.x now. I discovered that there
is a patch in OO-1.1.0-r1 to allow for 2.6.x kernels but I didn't know
that when I posted.

I just used kernel 2.4.x to compile OO and it all worked fine. (It runs
okay under kernel 2.6.x, it just doesn't compile.)