Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Gentoo Linux Support

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:10 AM
Peter
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cleaning up portage/distfiles var/tmp/portage

I notice that after emerging software, portage/distfiles contains the
actual downloaded files. There are also stray directories that seem to
remain in /var/tmp/portage.

I have four questions:
1) Is it OK to remove the Distfiles? The only way I would emerge again
would be to upgrade, and that means I would not need the old bz2 files.

2) Is it OK to remove the /var/tmp/portage directories after a successful
emerge?

3) What if I decide to archive the Distfiles to another location? Would
there be any reason I'd bring it back?

4) If it IS necessary to keep them, can I symlink to the archive location
so I don't clutter up my root partition?

The reason I think I have so many distfiles was because of the
installation from CD instructions that said to copy over all the distfiles.

Living and learning. Thanks for the help.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:10 AM
PiotrAF
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cleaning up portage/distfiles var/tmp/portage

On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:06:57 -0500, Peter wrote:

> I notice that after emerging software, portage/distfiles contains the
> actual downloaded files. There are also stray directories that seem to
> remain in /var/tmp/portage.
>
> I have four questions:
> 1) Is it OK to remove the Distfiles? The only way I would emerge again
> would be to upgrade, and that means I would not need the old bz2 files.


Yes, you may remove them

>
> 2) Is it OK to remove the /var/tmp/portage directories after a successful
> emerge?
>


That's why it's in /var/tmp and not elsewhere - you may remove it

> 3) What if I decide to archive the Distfiles to another location? Would
> there be any reason I'd bring it back?


man make.conf
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/index.xml?catid=gentoo


>
> 4) If it IS necessary to keep them, can I symlink to the archive location
> so I don't clutter up my root partition?
>


check above


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:10 AM
Andy Fraser
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cleaning up portage/distfiles var/tmp/portage

In alt.os.linux.gentoo, Peter uttered the immortal words:

> I have four questions:
> 1) Is it OK to remove the Distfiles?


Yes. See below before doing anything though.

> The only way I would emerge again
> would be to upgrade, and that means I would not need the old bz2 files.


That depends. If it's a new revision then the main source file(s) will still
be needed. Portage may only need to get a new patch file.

> 2) Is it OK to remove the /var/tmp/portage directories after a successful
> emerge?


AFAICT yes.

> 3) What if I decide to archive the Distfiles to another location? Would
> there be any reason I'd bring it back?


Yes. If you need to re-emerge something due to running revdep-rebuild or if
a new revision is released (see above).

> 4) If it IS necessary to keep them, can I symlink to the archive location
> so I don't clutter up my root partition?


I have heard of people doing something similar but haven't tried it. I run 5
Gentoo boxes here and store all the distfiles on my webserver (that also
acts as a local Portage mirror). I use that server as a mirror so emerge
looks there first (for most things at least) and pulls any needed files
across the network. Only files that haven't been downloaded before get
pulled from Gentoo's distfile mirrors. I keep the webserver relatively
clean by running a script to remove old files. I'll give more details if
you (or anyone else) asks for them.

--
Andy.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:10 AM
Peter
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cleaning up portage/distfiles var/tmp/portage

On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:24:38 +0000, Andy Fraser wrote:

> In alt.os.linux.gentoo, Peter uttered the immortal words:
>

snip...
>> The only way I would emerge again
>> would be to upgrade, and that means I would not need the old bz2 files.

>
> That depends. If it's a new revision then the main source file(s) will
> still be needed. Portage may only need to get a new patch file.


If I did hose the original bz2 file, wouldn't emerge just reget it if
needed?


Thanks to both of you for concise clear help!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:11 AM
Matt Klink
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cleaning up portage/distfiles var/tmp/portage

Peter wrote:
> If I did hose the original bz2 file, wouldn't emerge just reget it if
> needed?

of course! it tries to reget automagically whatever ain't found locally.

gts
Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:11 AM
Andy Fraser
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cleaning up portage/distfiles var/tmp/portage

In alt.os.linux.gentoo, Peter uttered the immortal words:

>> That depends. If it's a new revision then the main source file(s) will
>> still be needed. Portage may only need to get a new patch file.

>
> If I did hose the original bz2 file, wouldn't emerge just reget it if
> needed?


Yes but IMHO it puts extra unneeded load on the distfiles servers. I have
two machines running X.org which is reported as 64MB per install so 128MB
in total. I've emerged three versions of 6.8.0 (-r1, -r3 and -r4) on both
machines due to updates. Assuming that nothing changes in the bulk of the
sources for this example I'd have downloaded the same files 6 times which
is 384MB in total. Because I archive source files until they're no longer
needed by any ebuild I've only downloaded 64MB from a Gentoo distfiles
server and 320MB from my local distfile archive.

I hope this makes sense. :-)

--
Andy.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:16 AM
Pawel Kraszewski
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cleaning up portage/distfiles var/tmp/portage

Peter wrote:

> 1) Is it OK to remove the Distfiles? The only way I would emerge again
> would be to upgrade, and that means I would not need the old bz2 files.


Yes, but usually packages upgrading from -rn to -rn+1 (eg something-r1
to something-r2) use the same source (it is another patch to the same
source). So don't kill BZ2 of currently installed packages.

> 2) Is it OK to remove the /var/tmp/portage directories after a successful
> emerge?


Yes it is.

> 3) What if I decide to archive the Distfiles to another location? Would
> there be any reason I'd bring it back?


I did that trick:

1) copy all distfiles to another directory
2) setup WWW server for that directory (ensuring the distfiles are in
'distfiles' subdirectory, not root directory)
3) tell gentoo to lookup distfiles in local server first.

I did the trick (including local RSYNC) to feed a few machines with
Gentoo at home.

> 4) If it IS necessary to keep them, can I symlink to the archive location
> so I don't clutter up my root partition?


Yes, works for me. 'portage/distfiles' is a symlink at my system.

Well, for my laptop (small HDD) I tried two things:

NFS mount the whole portage tree - this appeared VERY slow, as emerge
browses through it quite a lot.
NFS mount just distfiles - this was quite a good idea, no sources
occupied scarce laptop's HDD. I connected it with DistCC and it worked
perfectly.


General answer to your questions is
"http://www.stacken.kth.se/~foo/gentoo/" with its "DISTCLEAN" package.
It removes all distfiles entries that are no longer referred to by any
installed ebuild. Does quite amazing job.
I modified it to move unreferenced sources to a shadow directory
(instead of nuking'em), and that directory is visible by local WWW
server. So if I wipe file, and it is necessary in a short time (eg,
upgrade - wipe - downgrade sequence), it would be loaded from shadow,
not from net.

--
Pawel Kraszewski
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860