vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| What do I do to get gnome-python-extras to install? An emerge of the stable version of gnome-python-extras fails to compile: __________________________________________________ ____________________ if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/python2.4 -I/usr/include/libnautilus-burn -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/pygtk-2.0 -O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -MT nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.Tpo" \ -c -o nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.lo `test -f 'nautilus_burn.c' || echo './'`nautilus_burn.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.Tpo" ".deps/nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.Plo"; \ else rm -f ".deps/nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/python2.4 -I/usr/include/libnautilus-burn -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/pygtk-2.0 -O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -MT nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.Tpo -c nautilus_burn.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.o nautilus_burn.override: In function `_wrap_nautilus_burn_recorder_write_tracks': nautilus_burn.override:99: error: too few arguments to function `nautilus_burn_recorder_write_tracks' nautilus_burn.override: In function `_wrap_nautilus_burn_recorder_blank_disc': nautilus_burn.override:140: error: too few arguments to function `nautilus_burn_recorder_blank_disc' nautilus_burn.c: In function `_wrap_nautilus_burn_recorder_get_error_message': nautilus_burn.c:272: warning: implicit declaration of function `nautilus_burn_recorder_get_error_message' nautilus_burn.c:272: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast nautilus_burn.c: In function `_wrap_nautilus_burn_recorder_get_error_message_de tails': nautilus_burn.c:284: warning: implicit declaration of function `nautilus_burn_recorder_get_error_message_details' nautilus_burn.c:284: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast make[2]: *** [nautilusburn_la-nautilus_burn.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-extras-2.10.2/work/gnome-python-extras-2.10.2/nautilusburn' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-extras-2.10.2/work/gnome-python-extras-2.10.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 !!! ERROR: dev-python/gnome-python-extras-2.10.2 failed. !!! Function src_compile, Line 51, Exitcode 2 __________________________________________________ ____________________ And the "~x86" version won't even configure: __________________________________________________ ____________________ Calculating dependencies >>> Unpacking source... >>> Unpacking gnome-python-extras-2.12.0.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-extras-2.12.0/work [32;01m*[0m Applying gnome-python-extras-nogda.patch ... [A[102G [34;01m[ [32;01mok[34;01m ][0m You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal. >>> Source unpacked. [32;01m*[0m Running elibtoolize in: gnome-python-extras-2.12.0 [32;01m*[0m Applying portage-1.2.0.patch ... [32;01m*[0m Applying max_cmd_len-1.5.0.patch ... [32;01m*[0m Applying sed-1.5.6.patch ... * econf: updating gnome-python-extras-2.12.0/config.guess with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.guess * econf: updating gnome-python-extras-2.12.0/config.sub with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.sub ../configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --without-gtkmozembed --without-gtkmozembed --disable-gtk-doc --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes [...] checking for EGG_RECENT... yes checking for WNCK... yes configure: error: --with-gtkmozembed argument must be either 'mozilla' or 'firefox' !!! Please attach the config.log to your bug report: !!! /var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-extras-2.12.0/work/gnome-python-extras-2.12.0/config.log !!! ERROR: dev-python/gnome-python-extras-2.12.0 failed. !!! Function econf, Line 495, Exitcode 0 !!! econf failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. __________________________________________________ ____________________ Note that --with-gtkmozembed _was_not_specified_ on the configure command line, so I've no idea why it's bitching about the argument to a command line option that wasn't given. Doing a "./configure" in the work directory works fine, as does a subsequent "make". If I then do a "make install" how to I tell the system it's been installed? -- Grant Edwards grante@visi.com |
| |||
| On 2006-01-25, Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com> wrote: > What do I do to get gnome-python-extras to install? > > An emerge of the stable version of gnome-python-extras fails to > compile: Assuming this package actually does compile for some people, one guess is that gnome-python-extras 2.10.2 is not compatible with Python 2.4. But, I've got 2.10.2 installed on a different machine that also has python 2.4 installed. :/ > And the "~x86" version won't even configure: Adding "USE=firefox" resulted in success, but it seems that instead of passing --without-gtkmozembed when neither the firefox nor mozilla USE flags is set, the ebuild should just pass nothing. -- Grant Edwards grante@visi.com |
| ||||
| On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:56:35 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: > Adding "USE=firefox" resulted in success, but it seems that > instead of passing --without-gtkmozembed when neither the > firefox nor mozilla USE flags is set, the ebuild should just > pass nothing. Thank you for following up on this, I had the same problem. And I can't report it on bugzilla because I'm upgrading my password manager where my bugzilla password is stored. :v |