SEO

Hi,

elisa ~ # emerge -s gentoo-sources
Searching...
[ Results for search key : gentoo-sources ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]

* sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
Latest version available: 2.4.28-r8
Latest version installed: 2.4.28-r8
Size of downloaded files: 31,453 kB
Homepage: http://www.kernel.org/ http://www.gentoo.org/
Description: Full sources including the Gentoo patchset for the 2.4 kernel tree
License: GPL-2


elisa ~ # emerge -s gentoo-dev-sources
Searching...
[ Results for search key : gentoo-dev-sources ]
[ Applications found : 0 ]


elisa ~ #

where did the 2.6 sources go? I read about some upgrades here and there,
but I don't seem to find which actions exactly I have to take to get
portage to serve me with 2.6 sources...

any help would be welcome!

--
greetings,
BBBart

Bart Van Loon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> elisa ~ # emerge -s gentoo-sources
> Searching...
> [ Results for search key : gentoo-sources ]
> [ Applications found : 1 ]
>
> * sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> Latest version available: 2.4.28-r8
> Latest version installed: 2.4.28-r8
> Size of downloaded files: 31,453 kB
> Homepage: http://www.kernel.org/ http://www.gentoo.org/
> Description: Full sources including the Gentoo patchset for the 2.4 kernel tree
> License: GPL-2
>
>
> elisa ~ # emerge -s gentoo-dev-sources
> Searching...
> [ Results for search key : gentoo-dev-sources ]
> [ Applications found : 0 ]
>
>
> elisa ~ #
>
> where did the 2.6 sources go? I read about some upgrades here and there,
> but I don't seem to find which actions exactly I have to take to get
> portage to serve me with 2.6 sources...
>
> any help would be welcome!

Weird. I guess you have done an "emerge sync" recently?
gentoo-sources should now be a 2.6 kernel and I guess the
gentoo-dev-sources have been temporarily withdrawn until we get 2.8
kernels. but why you would get gentoo-sources being a 2.4 I don't know.

maybe try another emerge sync - your rsync mirror might have been messed up?

Bart Van Loon <bbbart@kotnet.org> wrote:

> where did the 2.6 sources go?

They're there:

spider root # emerge -s gentoo-sources
Searching...
[ Results for search key : gentoo-sources ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]

* sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
Latest version available: 2.6.11-r5
Latest version installed: 2.6.11-r5

> I read about some upgrades here and there,
> but I don't seem to find which actions exactly I have to take to get
> portage to serve me with 2.6 sources...

Where is /etc/make.profile pointing to? It looks like there's now a
separate profile for 2.4 kernels.

--
Andy.

Bart Van Loon wrote:
> where did the 2.6 sources go? I read about some upgrades here and there,
> but I don't seem to find which actions exactly I have to take to get
> portage to serve me with 2.6 sources...
yr first command was all ok!
are you sure you lately synced yr portage-tree?!
try 'emerge sync' and then 'emerge -s gentoo-sources'.


HTH
Matt

Bart Van Loon wrote:
>where did the 2.6 sources go?
forgot to mention (as seen in Ben M.'s latest posting) that the formerly
called "gentoo-dev-sources" turned into "gentoo-sources" and
"gentoo-dev-sources" turned into "vanilla-sources".

have a look at ..
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/gentoo-dev-sources/about.htm
for more information.


HTH
Matt

On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:39:01 +0100, Andy Fraser wrote:

> Bart Van Loon <bbbart@kotnet.org> wrote:
>
>> where did the 2.6 sources go?
>
> They're there:
>
> spider root # emerge -s gentoo-sources
> Searching...
> [ Results for search key : gentoo-sources ]
> [ Applications found : 1 ]
>
> * sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> Latest version available: 2.6.11-r5
> Latest version installed: 2.6.11-r5
>
>> I read about some upgrades here and there,
>> but I don't seem to find which actions exactly I have to take to get
>> portage to serve me with 2.6 sources...
>
> Where is /etc/make.profile pointing to? It looks like there's now a
> separate profile for 2.4 kernels.

yes, that's probably it:

/etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4

and /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4/packages contains

<sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.5
<sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.5

however, I don't seem to find a 2.6 profile anywhere. is it safe to just
remove those two lines from the package file of the 2.4 profile?

thanks for the tip!

--
greetings,
BBBart

Bart Van Loon wrote:

> /etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4

This is your problem.

/etc/make.profile should be a symlink to
.../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0

this is the standard 2005.0 profile which features 2.6 kernels as standard

/etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4

is what you use if you want to stick with 2.4 kernels

Bart Van Loon wrote:
> Andy Fraser wrote:
>
>>It looks like there's now a separate profile for 2.4 kernels.
>
> yes, that's probably it:
>
> /etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4
>
> and /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4/packages contains
>
> <sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.5
> <sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.5
>
> however, I don't seem to find a 2.6 profile anywhere. is it safe to just
> remove those two lines from the package file of the 2.4 profile?

No, just link it to /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0
(without the 2.4 sub-directory).

Hth,
--
Ben M.

Bart Van Loon <bbbart@kotnet.org> wrote:

> > Where is /etc/make.profile pointing to? It looks like there's now a
> > separate profile for 2.4 kernels.
>
> yes, that's probably it:
>
> /etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4
>
> and /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4/packages contains
>
> <sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.5
> <sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.5
>
> however, I don't seem to find a 2.6 profile anywhere. is it safe to just
> remove those two lines from the package file of the 2.4 profile?

There isn't a 2.6 directory.
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0 is the path to the 2.6
profile.

--
Andy.

And so, Bart Van Loon just had to say on Saturday 09 April 2005 16:39 ...

> yes, that's probably it:
>
> /etc/make.profile -> ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0/2.4
>

Had a problem last week relating to emerge with these instructions:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml, Code Listing 3.1:
Changing to a 2005.0 profile.
--
oNb
Another happy Linux user - # 276084.
One must commit intellectual suicide to be atheist.