Ben Measures <saint_abroadremove@removehotmail.com> wrote:
> Arthur Hagen wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> * Stopping net.eth0 ... [OK]
>> * ERROR: problems stopping dependent services
>> * "net.eth1" is still up
>> (No, it isn't. Failing to remove a default gateway that doesn't
>> exist, it appears.)
>
> There's likely your problem - fix your configuration settings.

You think that not having a default gateway on a secondary interface is
a configuration problem? LOL! Forget that I ever posted in reply to
you, cause you obviously don't have much network experience.

>> If "init 2; init 3" works for you, you can't have a standard system,
>> or much software installed.
>
> ...or you can't configure your system.

You blatantly /ignore/ that I've shown that the order *is* wrong (which
it will be, since there's no way to specify separate orders for stop and
start)?

> It works for me; I run vanilla rc scripts; and have 30 services
> configured.

That a drunk can walk from one end of a pier to another doesn't prove
that it's safe to do so. I've *shown* what is wrong.

Don't bother replying, cause I won't be reading any further posts from
you. You gave me a good laugh by claiming that not having a default
route on an interface is a configuraion problem, though! :-)

--
*Art

Arthur Hagen wrote:
> Ben Measures wrote:
>>Arthur Hagen wrote:
>>
>>>* Stopping net.eth0 ... [OK]
>>>* ERROR: problems stopping dependent services
>>>* "net.eth1" is still up
>>>(No, it isn't.

This is your problem, and it's because of poor configuration.

>>>Failing to remove a default gateway that doesn't
>>>exist, it appears.)

This is a false assumption. The rc scripts don't remove routes when
bringing down an interface (since there's no need to).

> You blatantly /ignore/ that I've shown that the order *is* wrong

The order is not wrong, according to your configuration:
RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING="no"
This means that if eth1 is up, net is up.

> That a drunk can walk from one end of a pier to another doesn't prove
> that it's safe to do so.

That a drunk can fall off the end of a pier doesn't prove it isn't safe
to walk.

That a drunk can't use a hammer doesn't prove it's broken.

> I've *shown* what is wrong.

No, you've shown error messages - you have *no idea* what's wrong (and
make no attempt to fix it).

--
Ben M.