Unix Technical Forum

should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ?

This is a discussion on should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ? within the Gentoo Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hello. The instructions in http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Wireles...on_and_Startup say I would need to install baselayout-1.11.10 (I am currently using sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r6). and that ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Gentoo Linux Support

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:37 AM
student
 
Posts: n/a
Default should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ?

Hello.

The instructions in

http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Wireles...on_and_Startup

say I would need to install baselayout-1.11.10

(I am currently using sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r6).

and that before 'emerge' will let me do that,
I would have to change my '/etc/portage/package.keywords' file

from:
--------------------------
media-libs/svgalib ~x86
--------------------------

to:
---------------------------
media-libs/svgalib ~x86
sys-apps/baselayout ~x86
sys-libs/readline ~x86
sys-apps/sysvinit ~x86
app-shells/bash ~x86
------------------------

And indeed, if I do a pretend emerge with this new
'/etc/portage/package.keywords' file in place,
I get

..$ emerge -p -u baselayout

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-3.0-r8 [2.05b-r9]
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/readline-5.0-r2 [4.3-r5]
[ebuild N ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.10-r2 [1.9.4-r6]

However, AFAIK, my sysem is already up to date,
so I ask myself, if it would be a good idea for me to
do this, why didn't the last

emerge -u world

I ran do it already?

Given that it did not, is it safe for me to jump ahead and do it anyway?

(worrier)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:37 AM
J.O. Aho
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ?

student wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The instructions in
>
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Wireles...on_and_Startup
>
> say I would need to install baselayout-1.11.10
>
> (I am currently using sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r6).
>
>
> However, AFAIK, my sysem is already up to date,
> so I ask myself, if it would be a good idea for me to
> do this, why didn't the last
>
> emerge -u world
>
> I ran do it already?
>
> Given that it did not, is it safe for me to jump ahead and do it anyway?
>
> (worrier)


If you install packages marked ~x86 (test), there is a slight risk for that
the packages will have problems. But if you can't install the package you need
to get your WLAN to work, then you don't have much of an option.


//Aho
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:38 AM
Ben O'Brien
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ?

student wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The instructions in
>
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Wireles...on_and_Startup
>
> say I would need to install baselayout-1.11.10
>
> (I am currently using sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r6).
>
> and that before 'emerge' will let me do that,
> I would have to change my '/etc/portage/package.keywords' file
>
> from:
> --------------------------
> media-libs/svgalib ~x86
> --------------------------
>
> to:
> ---------------------------
> media-libs/svgalib ~x86
> sys-apps/baselayout ~x86
> sys-libs/readline ~x86
> sys-apps/sysvinit ~x86
> app-shells/bash ~x86
> ------------------------
>
> And indeed, if I do a pretend emerge with this new
> '/etc/portage/package.keywords' file in place,
> I get
>
> .$ emerge -p -u baselayout
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-3.0-r8 [2.05b-r9]
> [ebuild U ] sys-libs/readline-5.0-r2 [4.3-r5]
> [ebuild N ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86
> [ebuild U ] sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.10-r2 [1.9.4-r6]
>
> However, AFAIK, my sysem is already up to date,
> so I ask myself, if it would be a good idea for me to
> do this, why didn't the last
>
> emerge -u world
>
> I ran do it already?
>
> Given that it did not, is it safe for me to jump ahead and do it anyway?
>
> (worrier)

Do you really need wireless? If yes, then upgrade, if no, then don't.
I've done this exact upgrade before and it was fine. I too was a bit
scared at the number of ~x86s I had to add, but these days I have
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" in my make.conf and couldn't be happier.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:38 AM
student
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ?

Ben O'Brien wrote:
>
> Do you really need wireless? If yes, then upgrade, if no, then don't.
> I've done this exact upgrade before and it was fine. I too was a bit
> scared at the number of ~x86s I had to add, but these days I have
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" in my make.conf and couldn't be happier.


I have in fact been using some inexpensive Atmel-based USB
wireless adapters for several months. However, the excellent driver
that I am using (berlios) has not yet worked its way into the standard
Linux distro, so to bring the network up, I have to run visit each node and
run a simple-minded startup script that I made up, whereas I would of course
prefer to have wlan0 come up automatically as each node boots up.

(I am running Gentoo on the host but the nodes are running canned
Slackware.)

I guess what I don't like about the upgrade
that was suggested to me is that if I use

/etc/portage/package.mask
--------------------------
media-libs/svgalib ~x86
sys-apps/baselayout ~x86
sys-libs/readline ~x86
sys-apps/sysvinit ~x86
app-shells/bash ~x86
------------------------

then sysvinit gets dragged back into the picture,
and the fact that it seemed to me to have done away with sysvinit
was one of the things I liked most about Gentoo.

What's that about?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:38 AM
J.O. Aho
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ?

student wrote:
> Ben O'Brien wrote:
>
>>
>> Do you really need wireless? If yes, then upgrade, if no, then don't.
>> I've done this exact upgrade before and it was fine. I too was a bit
>> scared at the number of ~x86s I had to add, but these days I have
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" in my make.conf and couldn't be happier.

>
>
> I have in fact been using some inexpensive Atmel-based USB
> wireless adapters for several months. However, the excellent driver
> that I am using (berlios) has not yet worked its way into the standard
> Linux distro, so to bring the network up, I have to run visit each node and
> run a simple-minded startup script that I made up, whereas I would of
> course
> prefer to have wlan0 come up automatically as each node boots up.


Edit your /etc/conf.d/local-start to run the startup script.
Another way would be to make your own init script and add that to your default
runlevel.

> (I am running Gentoo on the host but the nodes are running canned
> Slackware.)


Slacware may have different name for it's local-stat file and would most
likely be found in /etc/rc.d.


//Aho
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:38 AM
student
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ?

J.O. Aho wrote:
> student wrote:
>
>> Ben O'Brien wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Do you really need wireless? If yes, then upgrade, if no, then don't.
>>> I've done this exact upgrade before and it was fine. I too was a bit
>>> scared at the number of ~x86s I had to add, but these days I have
>>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" in my make.conf and couldn't be happier.

>>
>>
>>
>> I have in fact been using some inexpensive Atmel-based USB
>> wireless adapters for several months. However, the excellent driver
>> that I am using (berlios) has not yet worked its way into the standard
>> Linux distro, so to bring the network up, I have to run visit each
>> node and
>> run a simple-minded startup script that I made up, whereas I would of
>> course
>> prefer to have wlan0 come up automatically as each node boots up.

>
>
> Edit your /etc/conf.d/local-start to run the startup script.


Wow, that wasn't near as hard as I thought it wold be, thanks!

> Another way would be to make your own init script and add that to your
> default runlevel.
>
>> (I am running Gentoo on the host but the nodes are running canned
>> Slackware.)

>
>
> Slacware may have different name for it's local-stat file and would most
> likely be found in /etc/rc.d.
>
>
> //Aho


Ok, will try it.

Thanks again!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com