This is a discussion on should I not upgrade to baselayout-1.11.10 ? within the Gentoo Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hello. The instructions in http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Wireles...on_and_Startup say I would need to install baselayout-1.11.10 (I am currently using sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r6). and that ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello. The instructions in http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Wireles...on_and_Startup say I would need to install baselayout-1.11.10 (I am currently using sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r6). and that before 'emerge' will let me do that, I would have to change my '/etc/portage/package.keywords' file from: -------------------------- media-libs/svgalib ~x86 -------------------------- to: --------------------------- media-libs/svgalib ~x86 sys-apps/baselayout ~x86 sys-libs/readline ~x86 sys-apps/sysvinit ~x86 app-shells/bash ~x86 ------------------------ And indeed, if I do a pretend emerge with this new '/etc/portage/package.keywords' file in place, I get ..$ emerge -p -u baselayout These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-3.0-r8 [2.05b-r9] [ebuild U ] sys-libs/readline-5.0-r2 [4.3-r5] [ebuild N ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86 [ebuild U ] sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.10-r2 [1.9.4-r6] However, AFAIK, my sysem is already up to date, so I ask myself, if it would be a good idea for me to do this, why didn't the last emerge -u world I ran do it already? Given that it did not, is it safe for me to jump ahead and do it anyway? (worrier) |
| |||
| student wrote: > Hello. > > The instructions in > > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Wireles...on_and_Startup > > say I would need to install baselayout-1.11.10 > > (I am currently using sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r6). > > > However, AFAIK, my sysem is already up to date, > so I ask myself, if it would be a good idea for me to > do this, why didn't the last > > emerge -u world > > I ran do it already? > > Given that it did not, is it safe for me to jump ahead and do it anyway? > > (worrier) If you install packages marked ~x86 (test), there is a slight risk for that the packages will have problems. But if you can't install the package you need to get your WLAN to work, then you don't have much of an option. //Aho |
| |||
| student wrote: > Hello. > > The instructions in > > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Wireles...on_and_Startup > > say I would need to install baselayout-1.11.10 > > (I am currently using sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r6). > > and that before 'emerge' will let me do that, > I would have to change my '/etc/portage/package.keywords' file > > from: > -------------------------- > media-libs/svgalib ~x86 > -------------------------- > > to: > --------------------------- > media-libs/svgalib ~x86 > sys-apps/baselayout ~x86 > sys-libs/readline ~x86 > sys-apps/sysvinit ~x86 > app-shells/bash ~x86 > ------------------------ > > And indeed, if I do a pretend emerge with this new > '/etc/portage/package.keywords' file in place, > I get > > .$ emerge -p -u baselayout > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > Calculating dependencies ...done! > [ebuild U ] app-shells/bash-3.0-r8 [2.05b-r9] > [ebuild U ] sys-libs/readline-5.0-r2 [4.3-r5] > [ebuild N ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86 > [ebuild U ] sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.10-r2 [1.9.4-r6] > > However, AFAIK, my sysem is already up to date, > so I ask myself, if it would be a good idea for me to > do this, why didn't the last > > emerge -u world > > I ran do it already? > > Given that it did not, is it safe for me to jump ahead and do it anyway? > > (worrier) Do you really need wireless? If yes, then upgrade, if no, then don't. I've done this exact upgrade before and it was fine. I too was a bit scared at the number of ~x86s I had to add, but these days I have ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" in my make.conf and couldn't be happier. |
| |||
| Ben O'Brien wrote: > > Do you really need wireless? If yes, then upgrade, if no, then don't. > I've done this exact upgrade before and it was fine. I too was a bit > scared at the number of ~x86s I had to add, but these days I have > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" in my make.conf and couldn't be happier. I have in fact been using some inexpensive Atmel-based USB wireless adapters for several months. However, the excellent driver that I am using (berlios) has not yet worked its way into the standard Linux distro, so to bring the network up, I have to run visit each node and run a simple-minded startup script that I made up, whereas I would of course prefer to have wlan0 come up automatically as each node boots up. (I am running Gentoo on the host but the nodes are running canned Slackware.) I guess what I don't like about the upgrade that was suggested to me is that if I use /etc/portage/package.mask -------------------------- media-libs/svgalib ~x86 sys-apps/baselayout ~x86 sys-libs/readline ~x86 sys-apps/sysvinit ~x86 app-shells/bash ~x86 ------------------------ then sysvinit gets dragged back into the picture, and the fact that it seemed to me to have done away with sysvinit was one of the things I liked most about Gentoo. What's that about? |
| |||
| student wrote: > Ben O'Brien wrote: > >> >> Do you really need wireless? If yes, then upgrade, if no, then don't. >> I've done this exact upgrade before and it was fine. I too was a bit >> scared at the number of ~x86s I had to add, but these days I have >> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" in my make.conf and couldn't be happier. > > > I have in fact been using some inexpensive Atmel-based USB > wireless adapters for several months. However, the excellent driver > that I am using (berlios) has not yet worked its way into the standard > Linux distro, so to bring the network up, I have to run visit each node and > run a simple-minded startup script that I made up, whereas I would of > course > prefer to have wlan0 come up automatically as each node boots up. Edit your /etc/conf.d/local-start to run the startup script. Another way would be to make your own init script and add that to your default runlevel. > (I am running Gentoo on the host but the nodes are running canned > Slackware.) Slacware may have different name for it's local-stat file and would most likely be found in /etc/rc.d. //Aho |
| ||||
| J.O. Aho wrote: > student wrote: > >> Ben O'Brien wrote: >> >>> >>> Do you really need wireless? If yes, then upgrade, if no, then don't. >>> I've done this exact upgrade before and it was fine. I too was a bit >>> scared at the number of ~x86s I had to add, but these days I have >>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" in my make.conf and couldn't be happier. >> >> >> >> I have in fact been using some inexpensive Atmel-based USB >> wireless adapters for several months. However, the excellent driver >> that I am using (berlios) has not yet worked its way into the standard >> Linux distro, so to bring the network up, I have to run visit each >> node and >> run a simple-minded startup script that I made up, whereas I would of >> course >> prefer to have wlan0 come up automatically as each node boots up. > > > Edit your /etc/conf.d/local-start to run the startup script. Wow, that wasn't near as hard as I thought it wold be, thanks! > Another way would be to make your own init script and add that to your > default runlevel. > >> (I am running Gentoo on the host but the nodes are running canned >> Slackware.) > > > Slacware may have different name for it's local-stat file and would most > likely be found in /etc/rc.d. > > > //Aho Ok, will try it. Thanks again! |