SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-21-2008, 12:20 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: sys-apps setarch Tony Davison wrote: > After a sync this evening sys-apps/setarch is blocking sys-apps/util- > linux-2.13-r2 > I've had a look around but cannot see any obvious reason for this block. > Anyone else seen it? > I noticed the same thing on my PowerPC and amd64 machines, while the x86 didn't have this issue as it had an upgrade a long time ago and don't recall what I thought back then. If you look at the ebuilds, one of the 2.12 and the 2.13-r2, you will noticed a major difference, the 2.12 line uses util-linux while the 2.13 line uses util-linux-ng which includes setarch, which means that the sys-apps/setarch is obsolete when using util-linux-ng. -- //Aho      |
|
02-21-2008, 12:20 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: sys-apps setarch On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:22:02 +0100, J.O. Aho wrote: > Tony Davison wrote: >> After a sync this evening sys-apps/setarch is blocking sys-apps/util- >> linux-2.13-r2 >> I've had a look around but cannot see any obvious reason for this >> block. Anyone else seen it? >> >> > I noticed the same thing on my PowerPC and amd64 machines, while the x86 > didn't have this issue as it had an upgrade a long time ago and don't > recall what I thought back then. > > If you look at the ebuilds, one of the 2.12 and the 2.13-r2, you will > noticed a major difference, the 2.12 line uses util-linux while the 2.13 > line uses util-linux-ng which includes setarch, which means that the > sys-apps/setarch is obsolete when using util-linux-ng. Thanks I didn't spot that, old age you know. -- BigTone |
|
02-21-2008, 12:20 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: sys-apps setarch On Jan 14, 6:21*am, Tony Davison <tony.davis...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:22:02 +0100, J.O. Aho wrote: > > Tony Davison wrote: > >> After a sync this evening sys-apps/setarch is blocking sys-apps/util- > >> linux-2.13-r2 > >> I've had a look around but cannot see any obvious reason for this > >> block. Anyone else seen it? > > > I noticed the same thing on my PowerPC and amd64 machines, while the x86 > > didn't have this issue as it had an upgrade a long time ago and don't > > recall what I thought back then. > > > If you look at the ebuilds, one of the 2.12 and the 2.13-r2, you will > > noticed a major difference, the 2.12 line uses util-linux while the 2.13 > > line uses util-linux-ng which includes setarch, which means that the > > sys-apps/setarch is obsolete when using util-linux-ng. > > Thanks I didn't spot that, old age you know. > > -- > BigTone- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - did it work? |
Linear Mode
