This is a discussion on Date for Oracle Database 10g for Solaris 10 (x86) within the Oracle Database forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> I was wondering about this and found a few messages that said March 05, but nothing official. Does anyone ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I was wondering about this and found a few messages that said March 05, but nothing official. Does anyone have a date or a link to an actual announcement (other than last fall when Sun/Oracle simply announced it would be supported). |
| |||
| In article <n7iWd.93852$tl3.79413@attbi_s02>, Scott <nospam@mailinator.com> wrote: >I was wondering about this and found a few messages that said March 05, but >nothing official. Does anyone have a date or a link to an actual >announcement (other than last fall when Sun/Oracle simply announced it would >be supported). Under Solaris platform certification, Metalink reports March for 10g R2 for Solaris 10 x86. It also states that support for 64-bit Solaris x64 will come with 10g R3 Not yet read when release 3 of 10g will ship. John groenveld@acm.org |
| |||
| "John D Groenveld" <groenvel@cse.psu.edu> wrote in message news:d0d2gv$p9f$1@neuromancer.cse.psu.edu... > In article <n7iWd.93852$tl3.79413@attbi_s02>, > Scott <nospam@mailinator.com> wrote: >>I was wondering about this and found a few messages that said March 05, >>but >>nothing official. Does anyone have a date or a link to an actual >>announcement (other than last fall when Sun/Oracle simply announced it >>would >>be supported). > > Under Solaris platform certification, Metalink reports March for 10g R2 > for > Solaris 10 x86. > > It also states that support for 64-bit Solaris x64 will come with 10g R3 > Not yet read when release 3 of 10g will ship. > Thanks. I wonder if that means the R2 version will NOT run at all on x64, or if it's just not 64 bit itself. |
| |||
| In article <yZpWd.96145$tl3.84709@attbi_s02>, Scott <nospam@mailinator.com> wrote: >Thanks. I wonder if that means the R2 version will NOT run at all on x64, >or if it's just not 64 bit itself. It will be a bug if 32-bit 10g R2 for Solaris x86 doesn't run on 64-bit Solaris x64 systems. Oracle 8.0.6 and 8.1.7 run fine on Solaris 10 x64. The current 10g requires some hackery on multi-core/multi-processor Solaris 10 x64 systems. John groenveld@acm.org |
| |||
| John D Groenveld wrote: > In article <yZpWd.96145$tl3.84709@attbi_s02>, > Scott <nospam@mailinator.com> wrote: > >>Thanks. I wonder if that means the R2 version will NOT run at all on x64, >>or if it's just not 64 bit itself. > > > It will be a bug if 32-bit 10g R2 for Solaris x86 doesn't run on 64-bit > Solaris x64 systems. > > Oracle 8.0.6 and 8.1.7 run fine on Solaris 10 x64. > The current 10g requires some hackery on multi-core/multi-processor > Solaris 10 x64 systems. > > John > groenveld@acm.org And it totally unsupported so if you have a problem don't call Oracle. -- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond) |
| |||
| In article <1110077665.212958@yasure>, DA Morgan <damorgan@x.washington.edu> wrote: >> Oracle 8.0.6 and 8.1.7 run fine on Solaris 10 x64. >> The current 10g requires some hackery on multi-core/multi-processor >> Solaris 10 x64 systems. This seems to be true on SPARC aswell. >And it totally unsupported so if you have a problem don't call Oracle. ditto. /wfr Fredrik -- Fredrik Lundholm dol @ ce.chalmers.se |
| |||
| In alt.solaris.x86 John D Groenveld <groenvel@cse.psu.edu> wrote: > Oracle 8.0.6 and 8.1.7 run fine on Solaris 10 x64. > The current 10g requires some hackery on multi-core/multi-processor > Solaris 10 x64 systems. > hints, details? toomas -- Regnant populi. |
| ||||
| In article <422b719c@news.infonet.ee>, Toomas Soome <Toomas.Soome@microlink.ee> wrote: >hints, details? Yes, sorry. <URL:http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?selm=V0eQd.108%24TO4.2652%40news.uswest.net > John groenveld@acm.org |