This is a discussion on hp vs sun for oracle within the Oracle Database forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of oracle apps and we now need ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of oracle apps and we now need to choose a hardware platform. We are considering all options. From what I have researched thus far, however, we are laning toward hp-ux. Sun is also another strong contender. I was wondering what everyone else is running on production as far as a unix flavor (wintel is out for us.) I would definitely appreciate any links or reviews that you might know of that could show objective reasons for choosing one platform over another, and definitely welcome opinions from those who have experience across several unix platforms. Thanks in advance! |
| |||
| "Rubin Farr" <vcovco@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:OdMob.91040$KB.6957@fe04.atl2.webusenet.com.. . > Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of > oracle apps and we now need to choose a hardware platform. We are > considering all options. From what I have researched thus far, however, we > are laning toward hp-ux. Sun is also another strong contender. > > I was wondering what everyone else is running on production as far as a unix > flavor (wintel is out for us.) > > I would definitely appreciate any links or reviews that you might know of > that could show objective reasons for choosing one platform over another, > and definitely welcome opinions from those who have experience across > several unix platforms. > > Thanks in advance! > > > well what skills to you have in your company to support the hardware? |
| |||
| |
| |||
| "Rubin Farr" <vcovco@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:OdMob.91040$KB.6957@fe04.atl2.webusenet.com.. . > Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of > oracle apps and we now need to choose a hardware platform. We are > considering all options. From what I have researched thus far, however, we > are laning toward hp-ux. Sun is also another strong contender. > > I was wondering what everyone else is running on production as far as a unix > flavor (wintel is out for us.) > > I would definitely appreciate any links or reviews that you might know of > that could show objective reasons for choosing one platform over another, > and definitely welcome opinions from those who have experience across > several unix platforms. > > Thanks in advance! > > > I would have recommended SUN, but they have started to use cheaper parts and thus resulting in lower reliability. The company I work for recently purchased a large SUN box for over a $ 1,000,000 . The machine is only 4 months old and it has had a hardware failure 3 times. We have SUN support that guarrentees a 2 hour response time with parts and service. In two of the three failures they did not have the part in stock and we had to wait a day. We have not had these problems with older SUN machines. In addition, I talked to a hardware engineer that used to work on those SUN machines and found out in fact the bean counters have gotten hold of the quality and were substituting $35 board for a board that used to cost $50. False economy. In the past I would have said either one are good machines. Now I am afraid not, SUN has gone to the bean counters, look elsewhere. Jim |
| |||
| Rubin Farr wrote: >Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of >oracle apps and we now need to choose a hardware platform. We are >considering all options. From what I have researched thus far, however, we >are laning toward hp-ux. Sun is also another strong contender. > >I was wondering what everyone else is running on production as far as a unix >flavor (wintel is out for us.) > >I would definitely appreciate any links or reviews that you might know of >that could show objective reasons for choosing one platform over another, >and definitely welcome opinions from those who have experience across >several unix platforms. > >Thanks in advance! > If it is my money I'd use Linux. If it is my employers money and they didn't want Linux I'd suggest focusing on HP (HP/UX) and IBM (AIX 5L). I have the same reservations Jim has expressed. Sun seems to be losing focus on what it is they are selling and what their customer's expect. IBM will try to gently push you toward DB2 or Informix; that's their job, but if you are focused on Oracle and let them know you aren't interested, they sell a very decent piece of hardware with, what I think are, the best CPUs in performance/dollars. -- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/e...ad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/e...oa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply) |
| |||
| You say Wintell is out, but I think you should seriously consider Linux. We have used HP and Sun a lot. HP use to be our primary choice at one site and it is now Sun. At another site HP is still the primary choice, but they are considering Linux for new hardware next year. We will probably all eventually (next 1-3 years) switch to Linux. In general, I think HP (most of the time) has the fastest CPUs, but they also cost more than Suns. We have good and bad experiences with both Sun and HPs. Some of the bad experiences were recent with both and some were not recent (7 years ago) . -- "Rubin Farr" <vcovco@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:OdMob.91040$KB.6957@fe04.atl2.webusenet.com.. . > Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of > oracle apps and we now need to choose a hardware platform. We are > considering all options. From what I have researched thus far, however, we > are laning toward hp-ux. Sun is also another strong contender. > > I was wondering what everyone else is running on production as far as a unix > flavor (wintel is out for us.) > > I would definitely appreciate any links or reviews that you might know of > that could show objective reasons for choosing one platform over another, > and definitely welcome opinions from those who have experience across > several unix platforms. > > Thanks in advance! > > > |
| |||
| i have nominal linux skills, but we will be outsourcing, training, doing knowledge transfer, and then transferring to our our team "DJ" <nospamplease@goaway.com> wrote in message news:AdOob.200$3h5.1500@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net... > > "Rubin Farr" <vcovco@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:OdMob.91040$KB.6957@fe04.atl2.webusenet.com.. . > > Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of > > oracle apps and we now need to choose a hardware platform. We are > > considering all options. From what I have researched thus far, however, we > > are laning toward hp-ux. Sun is also another strong contender. > > > > I was wondering what everyone else is running on production as far as a > unix > > flavor (wintel is out for us.) > > > > I would definitely appreciate any links or reviews that you might know of > > that could show objective reasons for choosing one platform over another, > > and definitely welcome opinions from those who have experience across > > several unix platforms. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > > > well what skills to you have in your company to support the hardware? > > |
| |||
| Linux 64 bit support is not there yet...maybe in another year or so....I definitely dig Intel, but we would have to buy more boxes to support the same amount of users. "dominant" <member32241@dbforums.com> wrote in message news:3548657.1067696963@dbforums.com... > > Why don;t you trust intel? > > What about a linux system? > > > -- > Posted via http://dbforums.com |
| |||
| Thanks Jim...I have heard the same as far as reliability...I personally am leaning toward HP... "Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-downwithspammersfamily@attbi.net> wrote in message news:IvRob.78634$e01.259843@attbi_s02... > > "Rubin Farr" <vcovco@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:OdMob.91040$KB.6957@fe04.atl2.webusenet.com.. . > > Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of > > oracle apps and we now need to choose a hardware platform. We are > > considering all options. From what I have researched thus far, however, we > > are laning toward hp-ux. Sun is also another strong contender. > > > > I was wondering what everyone else is running on production as far as a > unix > > flavor (wintel is out for us.) > > > > I would definitely appreciate any links or reviews that you might know of > > that could show objective reasons for choosing one platform over another, > > and definitely welcome opinions from those who have experience across > > several unix platforms. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > > I would have recommended SUN, but they have started to use cheaper parts and > thus resulting in lower reliability. The company I work for recently > purchased a large SUN box for over a $ 1,000,000 . The machine is only 4 > months old and it has had a hardware failure 3 times. We have SUN support > that guarrentees a 2 hour response time with parts and service. In two of > the three failures they did not have the part in stock and we had to wait a > day. We have not had these problems with older SUN machines. In addition, > I talked to a hardware engineer that used to work on those SUN machines and > found out in fact the bean counters have gotten hold of the quality and were > substituting $35 board for a board that used to cost $50. False economy. > > In the past I would have said either one are good machines. Now I am afraid > not, SUN has gone to the bean counters, look elsewhere. > Jim > > |
| ||||
| On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 06:04:49 -0500, Rubin Farr wrote: > Hello all. My company has decided to go with the comprehensive suite of > oracle apps and we now need to choose a hardware platform. We are > considering all options. From what I have researched thus far, however, we > are laning toward hp-ux. Sun is also another strong contender. > > I was wondering what everyone else is running on production as far as a unix > flavor (wintel is out for us.) > <SNIP> Hi Rubin, at present I'm not working However, when I was, I was in a software house in three parts geographically. Two sites had Sun and we had HP. HP is by far the most reliable - Our main production database was running on an old K420 server on HPUX 10-20 and Oracle 734 - it just ran and ran and ran. Uptime was measured in years. I wasn't allowed to upgrade the OS or Oracle to a supported version because everything was fine - and nobody wanted the hassles that would be involved in swapping over. We had another 4 HP boxes (2 L class, 1 N class and another K420) and all of them just worked on HPUX 11.00 with varios flavours of Oracle from 8.0 to 9i. No problems. I don't consider myself to have much skills in the Unix admin part of my job because the systems just worked. I did a couple of OS upgrades on a couple of the servers - no probs. Disaster Recovery is a doddle on HPUX - use the command Make_recovery_tape (or make_recovery) and that is it. All of the vg00 volume group goes to tape (or whatever) and you can reboot from it on a different server in the event of a disaster. We tested this at a DR provider and it was all as sweet as a nut. The other sites have had engineers on site for days at a time to fix the Sun boxes - processor boards, Memory chips, discs etc - they just die with monotonous regularity. We had no mail for three days because the entire mail system at one site (on a Sun) went down and wouldn't recover. DR is a PITA as well - or so I'm told by the Sun admins - who get more Unix experience on their boxes that I ever did on my HP 'babies'. HP - know it, use it, love it ! And you can get Linux for it as well. HTH Regards, Norman. PS. Ok, we *did* lose one K420 processor once - in 7 years ! -- Delete the obvious bit from my email address to reply by email. |