Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Oracle Database

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 05:09 PM
Burkhard Kiesel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Oracle 8.1.7.4 Performance Issues

Hi,


I have a question about Oracle 8.1.7.4 performance, where I need to find
the answer or solution.

We have a Oracle 8.1.7.4 database installed on a SUN Enterprise 450 with
2 processors and 2 GB RAM. The shared_pool is approx. 150 MB in size.
The db_block_buffer are in total 1,2 GB in size.

When I run the regular queries on the database, the took approx. 0,05 to
0,4 seconds for each query. For my tests, I run the query frequently on
the database and they took between 0,05 and 0,4 sec. That fine for me.

In the next morning, I ran the same queries and the first say 20 queries
are totally slow, means times from 5 sec up to 20 seconds for each
query. After the first 20-30 queries, the query time goes down to 0,05
to 0,4 seconds.

What is the reason for that. There were no queries in the night on the
database.
Only a online Backup was running. Is this a normal case, that when
starting in the morning, the first queries take this long time ?
Are there any parameters which I can check within Oracle configuration.


Regards


Burkhard Kiesel

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 05:09 PM
Richard Foote
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Oracle 8.1.7.4 Performance Issues

"Burkhard Kiesel" <burkhard.kiesel@siemens.com> wrote in message
news:3DFD733A.84080CD3@siemens.com...
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a question about Oracle 8.1.7.4 performance, where I need to find
> the answer or solution.
>
> We have a Oracle 8.1.7.4 database installed on a SUN Enterprise 450 with
> 2 processors and 2 GB RAM. The shared_pool is approx. 150 MB in size.
> The db_block_buffer are in total 1,2 GB in size.
>
> When I run the regular queries on the database, the took approx. 0,05 to
> 0,4 seconds for each query. For my tests, I run the query frequently on
> the database and they took between 0,05 and 0,4 sec. That fine for me.
>
> In the next morning, I ran the same queries and the first say 20 queries
> are totally slow, means times from 5 sec up to 20 seconds for each
> query. After the first 20-30 queries, the query time goes down to 0,05
> to 0,4 seconds.
>
> What is the reason for that. There were no queries in the night on the
> database.
> Only a online Backup was running. Is this a normal case, that when
> starting in the morning, the first queries take this long time ?
> Are there any parameters which I can check within Oracle configuration.
>


Hi Burkhard,

As always, the best thing to do is check out any specific waits for the
sessions and see what the hold up might be.

I would suspect that cached info is being lost and needs to be reloaded via
the first few runs of these queries. This info could be sql areas that need
to be reparsed and/or the data blocks that need to re-read from disk.

Once everything is cached again, performance improves.

Then again, it could just be Oracle needing a few fags and cups of coffee to
get going in the morning

Cheers

Richard
>
> Regards
>
>
> Burkhard Kiesel
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 05:09 PM
Sybrand Bakker
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Oracle 8.1.7.4 Performance Issues

Burkhard Kiesel <burkhard.kiesel@siemens.com> wrote in message news:<3DFD733A.84080CD3@siemens.com>...
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a question about Oracle 8.1.7.4 performance, where I need to find
> the answer or solution.
>
> We have a Oracle 8.1.7.4 database installed on a SUN Enterprise 450 with
> 2 processors and 2 GB RAM. The shared_pool is approx. 150 MB in size.
> The db_block_buffer are in total 1,2 GB in size.
>
> When I run the regular queries on the database, the took approx. 0,05 to
> 0,4 seconds for each query. For my tests, I run the query frequently on
> the database and they took between 0,05 and 0,4 sec. That fine for me.
>
> In the next morning, I ran the same queries and the first say 20 queries
> are totally slow, means times from 5 sec up to 20 seconds for each
> query. After the first 20-30 queries, the query time goes down to 0,05
> to 0,4 seconds.
>
> What is the reason for that. There were no queries in the night on the
> database.
> Only a online Backup was running. Is this a normal case, that when
> starting in the morning, the first queries take this long time ?
> Are there any parameters which I can check within Oracle configuration.
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Burkhard Kiesel


You basically state here 'It doesn't work'
Apart from that you don't provide too much clues.
Your real problem however are your queries, not the database.
You seem to have cranked up db_block_buffers to way beyond the
threshold Oracle advises, in order to get performance. Oracle
recommends sizing the SGA to not more than one third of RAM. Your SGA
amounts to 60 percent. Your server must be heavily faulting.
If you also have a default install of Solaris, you will have to cope
with a file cache. There is no real distinction in Solaris between
file cache and virtual memory. Backup is an I/O intensive operation,
which *will* use the file cache.

Before you start blaming Oracle instead of your application, you'll
need to find out (using statspack and/or v$system_events,
v$session_events and v$session_waits) *what* the database is waiting
for.
Do you have too many full table scans, too many sorts, inefficient
queries with way too much logical I/O (your db_block_buffer setting
clearly points to that)?Ultimately these are all factors which will
saturate your disk.
You would also need to run the top command on the server to see what
the server is actually doing. Is the cpu loaded or is it just waiting
for I/O.

These are a few things which you would need to post, before anyone can
give any sensible advice.

Regards

Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 05:09 PM
Svend Jensen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Oracle 8.1.7.4 Performance Issues

Burkhard Kiesel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a question about Oracle 8.1.7.4 performance, where I need to find
> the answer or solution.
>
> We have a Oracle 8.1.7.4 database installed on a SUN Enterprise 450 with
> 2 processors and 2 GB RAM. The shared_pool is approx. 150 MB in size.
> The db_block_buffer are in total 1,2 GB in size.
>
> When I run the regular queries on the database, the took approx. 0,05 to
> 0,4 seconds for each query. For my tests, I run the query frequently on
> the database and they took between 0,05 and 0,4 sec. That fine for me.
>
> In the next morning, I ran the same queries and the first say 20 queries
> are totally slow, means times from 5 sec up to 20 seconds for each
> query. After the first 20-30 queries, the query time goes down to 0,05
> to 0,4 seconds.
>
> What is the reason for that. There were no queries in the night on the
> database.
> Only a online Backup was running. Is this a normal case, that when
> starting in the morning, the first queries take this long time ?
> Are there any parameters which I can check within Oracle configuration.
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Burkhard Kiesel
>


My first guess is You hit a delayed block clean out.
Something (batch?) or somebody did Heavy update on your tables in
question. To speed up creating free buffers for the update, the
db-writer wrote the blocks 'as is' from the buffer cache to disk. That
is, blocks that are not quite clean and compact/organized as usual.
The next process that reads those blocks from disk, has inherited the
cleanup work, witch will give prolonged execute time and more cpu usage.

rgds

/Svend Jensen

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 05:10 PM
Nuno Souto
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Oracle 8.1.7.4 Performance Issues

Burkhard Kiesel <burkhard.kiesel@siemens.com> wrote in message news:<3DFD733A.84080CD3@siemens.com>...

>
> In the next morning, I ran the same queries and the first say 20 queries
> are totally slow, means times from 5 sec up to 20 seconds for each
> query. After the first 20-30 queries, the query time goes down to 0,05
> to 0,4 seconds.
>


You sure there isn't any stuff running at that time that
uses up all memory and makes Oracle be paged out?
Can't think of any reason for this slow-down early morning,
other than Richard's suggestion of lack of coffee...

Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto@optusnet.com.au.nospam
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964