vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| hi all: My oracle / OS version is 64bit Oracle 10g 10.2.0.2 and 64bit windows 2003 server with 8 CPUs. I had migrated my 9i to 10g, and i noticed that the query i specified hint /*+parallel(a)*/ will cause the Oracle use all 8 CPUs then the Server will down suddenly. When I specified /*+parallel(a,4)*/ then problem solved. And 9i haven't this problem. Any one come cross the same problem? Thank u in advanced. Havel |
| |||
| Havel Zhang wrote: > hi all: > > My oracle / OS version is 64bit Oracle 10g 10.2.0.2 and 64bit > windows 2003 server with 8 CPUs. I had migrated my 9i to 10g, and i > noticed that the query i specified hint /*+parallel(a)*/ will cause > the Oracle use all 8 CPUs then the Server will down suddenly. > When I specified /*+parallel(a,4)*/ then problem solved. And 9i > haven't this problem. > > Any one come cross the same problem? > > Thank u in advanced. > > Havel What is in the alert log? -- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.org |
| |||
| On May 18, 1:30 am, Havel Zhang <havel.zh...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi all: > > My oracle / OS version is 64bit Oracle 10g 10.2.0.2 and 64bit > windows 2003 server with 8 CPUs. I had migrated my 9i to 10g, and i > noticed that the query i specified hint /*+parallel(a)*/ will cause > the Oracle use all 8 CPUs then the Server will down suddenly. > When I specified /*+parallel(a,4)*/ then problem solved. And 9i > haven't this problem. > > Any one come cross the same problem? > > Thank u in advanced. > > Havel If you don't know how to proceed with deciding when to use parallel query and when not to use it ... avoid it entirely. Many people running oracle on systems with 8 cpu's actually do some research to look at what might make sense for their systems. |
| ||||
| On 5月19日, 上午6时29分, hpuxrac <johnbhur...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On May 18, 1:30 am, Havel Zhang <havel.zh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi all: > > > My oracle / OS version is 64bit Oracle 10g 10.2.0.2 and 64bit > > windows 2003 server with 8 CPUs. I had migrated my 9i to 10g, and i > > noticed that the query i specified hint /*+parallel(a)*/ will cause > > the Oracle use all 8 CPUs then the Server will down suddenly. > > When I specified /*+parallel(a,4)*/ then problem solved. And 9i > > haven't this problem. > > > Any one come cross the same problem? > > > Thank u in advanced. > > > Havel > > If you don't know how to proceed with deciding when to use parallel > query and when not to use it ... avoid it entirely. > > Many people running oracle on systems with 8 cpu's actually do some > research to look at what might make sense for their systems. hi all: sorry for you two i found parallel_max_server have been set 235!! (i wondering who set it), and i set it to 4, the problem solved. because when u specified parallel hint without any integer followed, system will using init param. thanks for all. havel |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|