Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > DB2

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 10:16 AM
Tomasz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Embedded SQL

Hi all
We plan to write large application (sales, purchase, accounting) in C/C++.
It will work with DB2 and other databases (MS SQL and Oracle). Client will
work under Win and Linux, so ADO and OLE DB aren't solution.
It seems ESQL standard is the only solution that allows to write such
application once and connect to different databases. Is this good choice? Is
this fit for serious application? Will it be supported in the future?
In your opinion, which API would be the best solution?

your help would be greatly appreciated
Tomasz



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 10:17 AM
Larry
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embedded SQL

Depends upon whether your SQL is static or not. And ... I don't believe MS or
Oracle support embedded SQL. You may want to take a more dynamic approach and
look at the CLI interface.

Larry Edelstein

Tomasz wrote:

> Hi all
> We plan to write large application (sales, purchase, accounting) in C/C++.
> It will work with DB2 and other databases (MS SQL and Oracle). Client will
> work under Win and Linux, so ADO and OLE DB aren't solution.
> It seems ESQL standard is the only solution that allows to write such
> application once and connect to different databases. Is this good choice? Is
> this fit for serious application? Will it be supported in the future?
> In your opinion, which API would be the best solution?
>
> your help would be greatly appreciated
> Tomasz


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 10:17 AM
efiryago@profitlogic.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embedded SQL

"Tomasz" <rn55@nospam.wp.pl> wrote in message news:<bhfcq5$6cm$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>...
> Hi all
> We plan to write large application (sales, purchase, accounting) in C/C++.
> It will work with DB2 and other databases (MS SQL and Oracle). Client will
> work under Win and Linux, so ADO and OLE DB aren't solution.
> It seems ESQL standard is the only solution that allows to write such
> application once and connect to different databases. Is this good choice? Is
> this fit for serious application? Will it be supported in the future?
> In your opinion, which API would be the best solution?
>
> your help would be greatly appreciated
> Tomasz



It seems like in your case the only solution would be using CLI/ODBC.


-Eugene
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 10:17 AM
PM \(pm3iinc-nospam\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embedded SQL

CLI is DB2 only right?
For multiple dbms that would be ODBC right? (ODBC is similar to CLI.)

PM

"Larry" <lsedels@us.ibm.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:3F3B8790.6EAB0EB8@us.ibm.com...
> Depends upon whether your SQL is static or not. And ... I don't believe MS

or
> Oracle support embedded SQL. You may want to take a more dynamic approach

and
> look at the CLI interface.
>
> Larry Edelstein
>
> Tomasz wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> > We plan to write large application (sales, purchase, accounting) in

C/C++.
> > It will work with DB2 and other databases (MS SQL and Oracle). Client

will
> > work under Win and Linux, so ADO and OLE DB aren't solution.
> > It seems ESQL standard is the only solution that allows to write such
> > application once and connect to different databases. Is this good

choice? Is
> > this fit for serious application? Will it be supported in the future?
> > In your opinion, which API would be the best solution?
> >
> > your help would be greatly appreciated
> > Tomasz

>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 10:17 AM
Jiang Qingshuang
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embedded SQL

DB2 Federated Database Technology provides the mechanism of
integrating multiple data sources.
http://www-900.ibm.com/developerWork...haas_eng.shtml

"Tomasz" <rn55@nospam.wp.pl> wrote in message news:<bhfcq5$6cm$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>...
> Hi all
> We plan to write large application (sales, purchase, accounting) in C/C++.
> It will work with DB2 and other databases (MS SQL and Oracle). Client will
> work under Win and Linux, so ADO and OLE DB aren't solution.
> It seems ESQL standard is the only solution that allows to write such
> application once and connect to different databases. Is this good choice? Is
> this fit for serious application? Will it be supported in the future?
> In your opinion, which API would be the best solution?
>
> your help would be greatly appreciated
> Tomasz

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 10:17 AM
Hemant Shah
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embedded SQL

While stranded on information super highway Tomasz wrote:
Hi all
We plan to write large application (sales, purchase, accounting) in C/C++.
It will work with DB2 and other databases (MS SQL and Oracle). Client will
work under Win and Linux, so ADO and OLE DB aren't solution.
It seems ESQL standard is the only solution that allows to write such
application once and connect to different databases. Is this good choice? Is
this fit for serious application? Will it be supported in the future?
In your opinion, which API would be the best solution?

your help would be greatly appreciated
Tomasz


I am in process of porting our application from DB2 to Oracle. We
use embedded SQL and it is relatively easy to port from one database to
another as long as you do not use LOBs, and make sure that the date/time
settings are same across the database so you can specify date/time in one
format (e.g. YYYY-MM-DD). We use LOBs and VARCHARS which require some
tweaking of the code. If you use "FOR FETCH ONLY" or "FOR READ ONLY" in
DB2 SELECT statements then you will have to change the code because
ORACLE does not support "FOR FETCH ONLY" and "FOR READ ONLY".

Try to stick to SQL92 standard and it will be easy to port.

DB2 and Oracle has precompiler that converts ESQL to C function calls.

If you use CLI then each database has different Call Level Interface,
I did not find any similarity between Oracle and DB2, and you know M$ will
be different than rest of the world. I believe MS SQL also has ESQL
precompiler.






--
Hemant Shah /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
E-mail: NoJunkMailshah@xnet.com \ / ---------------------
X against HTML mail
TO REPLY, REMOVE NoJunkMail / \ and postings
FROM MY E-MAIL ADDRESS.
-----------------[DO NOT SEND UNSOLICITED BULK E-MAIL]------------------
I haven't lost my mind, Above opinions are mine only.
it's backed up on tape somewhere. Others can have their own.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 10:17 AM
Blair Adamache
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embedded SQL

Most applications these days are being written with stored procedures,
not embedded SQL.

Tomasz wrote:

> Hi all
> We plan to write large application (sales, purchase, accounting) in C/C++.
> It will work with DB2 and other databases (MS SQL and Oracle). Client will
> work under Win and Linux, so ADO and OLE DB aren't solution.
> It seems ESQL standard is the only solution that allows to write such
> application once and connect to different databases. Is this good choice? Is
> this fit for serious application? Will it be supported in the future?
> In your opinion, which API would be the best solution?
>
> your help would be greatly appreciated
> Tomasz
>
>
>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 10:17 AM
Wolfgang Riedel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embedded SQL

Tomasz wrote:
>
> Hi all
> We plan to write large application (sales, purchase, accounting) in C/C++.
> It will work with DB2 and other databases (MS SQL and Oracle). Client will
> work under Win and Linux, so ADO and OLE DB aren't solution.
> It seems ESQL standard is the only solution that allows to write such
> application once and connect to different databases. Is this good choice? Is
> this fit for serious application? Will it be supported in the future?
> In your opinion, which API would be the best solution?
>
> your help would be greatly appreciated
> Tomasz


Hi Thomasz,

We have done this (Oracle, Informix, Db2 and Watcom) (don't know about MS SQL),
works fine, but you have to look out for some differences in native/sql-mappings
f.e. Oracle maps varchar to struct, db2 and informix to char* or [], returncodes,
sqlcodes will be different, so will be includes and global(!) vars, needed casts
in SQL, format (and name!) of parameter markers, input indicator variables,
filescope-uniqueness of local (ora!) function variablenames etc.

As your application, like ours, will only connect to on db-system (I suppose), a
own
preprocessing of source and headers to generate db-specific files should give you
better results than odbc.

And btw., dynamic ESQL works fine with all of them, all you have to do, is a
EXEC SQL PREPARE <statement> FROM :<var>

hth,
Wolfgang
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815