SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-26-2008, 06:20 PM
| ||||
| ||||
 Has type 4 JDBC changed the rules about how FPs must match up? RH Linux AS 2.1 DB2 v8 UDB WSE Hello All: I am testing my soon-to-be-in-production DB2 v8 **FP 5** server. In a test java program, I just used the DB2 v8 **FP 4** db2jcc.jar file (and the com.ibm.db2.jcc.DB2Driver class) to successfully connect to that new **FP 5** server. Does that make sense? Should I be able to get a type 4 JDBC connection to a FP 5 server using a FP 4 jdbc driver? Do the rules about how the fixpaks must be the same on both client & server only apply to type 2 & 3 JDBC, and not type 4?? Any thoughts appreciated. allen      |
|
02-26-2008, 06:20 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Has type 4 JDBC changed the rules about how FPs must match up? "aj" <ronald@mcdonalds.com> wrote in message news:10chaksf224vr78@news.supernews.com... > RH Linux AS 2.1 > DB2 v8 UDB WSE > > Hello All: > > I am testing my soon-to-be-in-production DB2 v8 **FP 5** > server. > > In a test java program, I just used the DB2 v8 **FP 4** > db2jcc.jar file (and the com.ibm.db2.jcc.DB2Driver class) > to successfully connect to that new **FP 5** server. > > Does that make sense? Should I be able to get a type 4 JDBC > connection to a FP 5 server using a FP 4 jdbc driver? Yes. > > Do the rules about how the fixpaks must be the same on both > client & server only apply to type 2 & 3 JDBC, and not type 4?? It would be the best if the version and release number of db2 server and client are the same. But this is not A MUST. But I will not suggest to FP5 jdbc driver talk to FP4 server. > > Any thoughts appreciated. > > allen |
 |
« Migration problem due to decimal separator keeping being COMMA instead of PERIOD
|
ADO.Net & Locking »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.
