This is a discussion on Which OS is the best option to install DB2 Universal DataBase Workgroup Server Unlimited Edition? within the DB2 forums, part of the Database Server Software category; -->...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| "ja" <ja@socal.rr.com> wrote in message news:5qld90d05e7ggr975qdm2kt7ecoe4jr1il@4ax.com... > Works well on all supported OS's (Windows, UNIX, Linux). It may depend somewhat on how much memory you have since there are different DB2 limits for each if you are using 32 bit versions. |
| |||
| Well, I am getting a server with the following specs: dual xeon 2.8 mhz 4gb of ram By comparing win2k server and linux, which one is a better option as far as speed goes? On Mon, 3 May 2004 17:57:21 -0600, "Mark A" <ma@switchboard.net> wrote: >"ja" <ja@socal.rr.com> wrote in message >news:5qld90d05e7ggr975qdm2kt7ecoe4jr1il@4ax.com.. . >> >Works well on all supported OS's (Windows, UNIX, Linux). It may depend >somewhat on how much memory you have since there are different DB2 limits >for each if you are using 32 bit versions. > |
| |||
| "ja" <ja@socal.rr.com> wrote in message news:3vhf90l1klmtuubdo84p1ie7mpjnast4vo@4ax.com... > Well, I am getting a server with the following specs: > dual xeon 2.8 mhz > 4gb of ram > > By comparing win2k server and linux, which one is a better option as > far as speed goes? > I believe that DB2 can address more memory on Windows 2K (important for DB2 Buffer Pools) than Linux. I may be wrong, but I think W2K DB2 memory limit is about 3GB and Linux is closer to 1 GB. |
| |||
| That brings up an interesting question. Is he running 32-bit or 64-bit DB2? 64-bit lifts any addressability limitations. And I think the 32-bit limit on Linux is actually about 1.7GB. Can't remember what it is on Win2k. Larry Edelstein Mark A wrote: > "ja" <ja@socal.rr.com> wrote in message > news:3vhf90l1klmtuubdo84p1ie7mpjnast4vo@4ax.com... > >>Well, I am getting a server with the following specs: >>dual xeon 2.8 mhz >>4gb of ram >> >>By comparing win2k server and linux, which one is a better option as >>far as speed goes? >> > > I believe that DB2 can address more memory on Windows 2K (important for DB2 > Buffer Pools) than Linux. I may be wrong, but I think W2K DB2 memory limit > is about 3GB and Linux is closer to 1 GB. > > |
| |||
| "Larry" <Larry@nospam.net> wrote in message news:8FWlc.130345$Gd3.31593249@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv .net... > That brings up an interesting question. Is he running 32-bit or 64-bit > DB2? 64-bit lifts any addressability limitations. And I think the 32-bit > limit on Linux is actually about 1.7GB. Can't remember what it is on Win2k. > > Larry Edelstein > Can someone run 64-bit DB2 on Windows 2000? |
| |||
| For 64-bit DB2 on Windows, you need one of: Windows XP, Windows .Net, Windows 2003 Mark A wrote: > "Larry" <Larry@nospam.net> wrote in message > news:8FWlc.130345$Gd3.31593249@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv .net... > >>That brings up an interesting question. Is he running 32-bit or 64-bit >>DB2? 64-bit lifts any addressability limitations. And I think the 32-bit >>limit on Linux is actually about 1.7GB. Can't remember what it is on > > Win2k. > >>Larry Edelstein >> > > Can someone run 64-bit DB2 on Windows 2000? > > |
| |||
| The limit for DB2 shared memory on 32-bit Windows is 3 GB (larger if you use AWE). The limit on 32-bit Linux is tis about 2.2 GB with SuSE SLES 8 service pack 2 and DB2 v8.1 FixPak 2 or later. Larry wrote: > That brings up an interesting question. Is he running 32-bit or 64-bit > DB2? 64-bit lifts any addressability limitations. And I think the 32-bit > limit on Linux is actually about 1.7GB. Can't remember what it is on Win2k. > > Larry Edelstein > > Mark A wrote: > >> "ja" <ja@socal.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:3vhf90l1klmtuubdo84p1ie7mpjnast4vo@4ax.com... >> >>> Well, I am getting a server with the following specs: >>> dual xeon 2.8 mhz >>> 4gb of ram >>> >>> By comparing win2k server and linux, which one is a better option as >>> far as speed goes? >>> >> >> I believe that DB2 can address more memory on Windows 2K (important >> for DB2 >> Buffer Pools) than Linux. I may be wrong, but I think W2K DB2 memory >> limit >> is about 3GB and Linux is closer to 1 GB. >> >> > |
| |||
| "Blair Adamache" <badamache@2muchspam.yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c7aqrt$ddk$1@hanover.torolab.ibm.com... > The limit for DB2 shared memory on 32-bit Windows is 3 GB (larger if you > use AWE). > > The limit on 32-bit Linux is tis about 2.2 GB with > SuSE SLES 8 service pack 2 and DB2 v8.1 FixPak 2 or later. > Any idea about RedHat? |
| ||||
| Well I've heard about something called "4GB/4GB split kernel" that should allow you to do 3 GB - on RH and SuSE, but I have no idea if IBM has ever tested this. Perhaps a linux guru (bb?) can enlighten us. Mark A wrote: > "Blair Adamache" <badamache@2muchspam.yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:c7aqrt$ddk$1@hanover.torolab.ibm.com... > >>The limit for DB2 shared memory on 32-bit Windows is 3 GB (larger if you >>use AWE). >> >>The limit on 32-bit Linux is tis about 2.2 GB with >>SuSE SLES 8 service pack 2 and DB2 v8.1 FixPak 2 or later. >> > > Any idea about RedHat? > > |