This is a discussion on Run db2updv8 after installing fixpack 9a? within the DB2 forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> On the forum at ibm.software.db2.udb it was mentioned that one should run db2updv8 after installing fixpack 9 (or 9a). ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On the forum at ibm.software.db2.udb it was mentioned that one should run db2updv8 after installing fixpack 9 (or 9a). But there is no mention of db2updv8 in FP9a installation readme file. Anyone know what is going on? |
| |||
| In article <AMSdnZ2dnZ3zbrGdnZ2dnYECld6dnZ2dRVn-zJ2dnZ0@comcast.com>, Mark A (nobody@nowhere.com) says... > On the forum at ibm.software.db2.udb it was mentioned that one should run > db2updv8 after installing fixpack 9 (or 9a). But there is no mention of > db2updv8 in FP9a installation readme file. Anyone know what is going on? > After installing a fixpack I always run db2updv<7/8>. Just to be sure. It isn't mentioned in every readme file but it's just one of those things. I also always rebind db2ubind.lst and db2cli.lst. With FP9a it should have been in the readme because new functions are available only after running db2updv8. |
| |||
| "Gert van der Kooij" <gert@invalid.nl> wrote in message > After installing a fixpack I always run db2updv<7/8>. Just to be > sure. It isn't mentioned in every readme file but it's just one of > those things. I also always rebind db2ubind.lst and db2cli.lst. > > With FP9a it should have been in the readme because new functions are > available only after running db2updv8. Rebind db2ubind.lst and db2cli.lst are mentioned in the readme file for FP9a (and every readme file I recall seeing). What do mean "it's just one of those things"? Don't people read RTFM anymore?. There is no mention of db2updv8 in the FP9a readme file. Since when are people expected to correctly install fixpacks if the instructions are bad? So what am I supposed to do now? Tell my customer that I need to schedule another outage because IBM fixpack install instructions were incorrect? I doubt that my customers would even believe me and instead blame me for the mistake. Someone in IBM management needs to roll some heads. The installation instructions have always been hard to read and poorly organized, but this is gross negligence. |
| |||
| In article <aaedneh4PZ4rOZXeRVn-1A@comcast.com>, Mark A (nobody@nowhere.com) says... > "Gert van der Kooij" <gert@invalid.nl> wrote in message > > After installing a fixpack I always run db2updv<7/8>. Just to be > > sure. It isn't mentioned in every readme file but it's just one of > > those things. I also always rebind db2ubind.lst and db2cli.lst. > > > > With FP9a it should have been in the readme because new functions are > > available only after running db2updv8. > > Rebind db2ubind.lst and db2cli.lst are mentioned in the readme file for FP9a > (and every readme file I recall seeing). > > What do mean "it's just one of those things"? Don't people read RTFM > anymore?. There is no mention of db2updv8 in the FP9a readme file. Since > when are people expected to correctly install fixpacks if the instructions > are bad? > > So what am I supposed to do now? Tell my customer that I need to schedule > another outage because IBM fixpack install instructions were incorrect? I > doubt that my customers would even believe me and instead blame me for the > mistake. > > Someone in IBM management needs to roll some heads. The installation > instructions have always been hard to read and poorly organized, but this is > gross negligence. > > I ran into it after installing some V7 update which wasn't mentioned also. Since then I always run db2updv.. But if you don't need to use the new functionality your customers won't need another outage. I agree it should have been mentioned in the readme, that's just 'one of those things'. Updating the docs and making them available to the customers when adding functionality is another one. |
| |||
| In article <aaedneh4PZ4rOZXeRVn-1A@comcast.com>, Mark A (nobody@nowhere.com) says... Mark, something seems to be wrong with the date on your posts. In my newsreader it looks like they are sent at 05:36 on august 21 western europian time ?? |
| |||
| "Gert van der Kooij" <gert@invalid.nl> wrote in message > Mark, something seems to be wrong with the date on your posts. In my > newsreader it looks like they are sent at 05:36 on august 21 western > europian time ?? I have fixed it now. I had to reset the CMOS on my machine yesterday after flashing my bios, and I entered the new date incorrectly (PM instead of AM). Thanks. |