vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| We have a situation almost exactly like that in the MS documentation vis a vis peer-to-peer replication. We have three servers and three user groups, one each in Chicago, New York, and Bermuda. Because of our business practices, we are fairly confident that only one group will be updating a given record at any one time but the users will be updating their own local database servers and those updates must appear on all three servers. Reading through the documentation, MS seems to recommend peer-to-peer merge replication. Unfortunately, the documenation then goes off and gives an example only of transaction replication without updating subscriptions. Well, OK I sez, I'll just adpat what the docs say but select merge replication. Doesn't work that way. Using SQL studio, I have never been able to get to a peer-to-peer topology option using anything but transaction replicas without updating subscriptions. Using T-SQL, it looks like I can brute force peer to peer replication with updating subscriptions but the sp_addmergedpublication function does not have any options for peer-to-peer topology. So, what gives? How do I set up peer-to-peer merge replication? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. Randy |