This is a discussion on Is this correct use of INSTEAD OF Triggers? within the SQL Server forums, part of the Microsoft SQL Server category; --> I am loading data from table A into table B. Certain columns in B have check constraints. I'd like ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I am loading data from table A into table B. Certain columns in B have check constraints. I'd like for any rows from A, which violate constraints, to be inserted into a third table, C. When the process is finished, I'll have only good rows in B, and exeption rows in C. I am investigating INSTEAD OF triggers, however my question to the group is, is there a better or best practice for this scenario? This must be common. Any high-level tips or direction will be highly appreciated. DAP |
| |||
| >> loading data from table A into table B. Certain columns in B have check constraints. I'd like for any rows from A, which violate constraints, to be inserted into a third table, C. << You might want to use a cursor that attempts to insert each A row into B and throws the exceptions into C. This would give you better control and perhaps a chance to fix the bad rows with (ugh!) procedural code. A moire set-oriented approach woudl be to create a VIEW on A whch has the B constraints: CREATE VIEW GoodA AS SELECT * FROM A WHERE << B's constraints as predicates>> ; You are probably thinking that the next step is to use: CREATE VIEW BadA AS SELECT * FROM A WHERE NOT (<< B's constraints as predicates>>); But this does not work. A CHECK() constraint will accept an UNKNOWN result from its predicate; a WHERE clause will reject them. You will have to write a little extra code in each predicate to handle NULLs. example: CREATE TABLE B ( .. foo INTEGER CHECK ( foo >= 0), -- works for null ..); SELECT * FROM A WHERE ( foo >= 0 OR foo IS NULL); |
| |||
| Hi You can try something like: INSERT INTO Table C SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM TABLE A WHERE <CLAUSE TO TEST CONSTRAINT FAIL> INSERT INTO Table B SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM TABLE A WHERE <CLAUSE TO TEST CONSTRAINTS PASS> OR INSERT INTO Table B SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM TABLE A WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM TABLE C WHERE <CLAUSE TO CHECK NOT IN C>) John "Dan" <dpratte@dpratte.com> wrote in message news:1115474335.494377.167790@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com... >I am loading data from table A into table B. Certain columns in B have > check constraints. I'd like for any rows from A, which violate > constraints, to be inserted into a third table, C. When the process is > finished, I'll have only good rows in B, and exeption rows in C. > > I am investigating INSTEAD OF triggers, however my question to the > group is, is there a better or best practice for this scenario? This > must be common. Any high-level tips or direction will be highly > appreciated. > > DAP > |
| |||
| Dan (dpratte@dpratte.com) writes: > I am loading data from table A into table B. Certain columns in B have > check constraints. I'd like for any rows from A, which violate > constraints, to be inserted into a third table, C. When the process is > finished, I'll have only good rows in B, and exeption rows in C. > > I am investigating INSTEAD OF triggers, however my question to the > group is, is there a better or best practice for this scenario? This > must be common. Not really. I think the only way to do this without duplicating the constraints is run a cursor one-by-one as suggested by Celko. An improvement could be to first attempt to insert all, and if there is an error, use the cursor as a fallback. But you could not do this in an INSTEAD OF trigger, because an error in a trigger aborts the batch. You see, the whole idea is that the INSERT statement should be atomic, either all rows make it, or others not. An alternative would be move the constraints to the trigger and check for them there. An INSTEAD OF trigger would then redo the original INSERT statement for the good rows. An AFTER trigger would delete the bad rows. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinf...2000/books.asp |
| ||||
| Hi I missed the title to this! Rather than use a trigger I would put the logic into a stored procedure. John "John Bell" <jbellnewsposts@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:427d0150$0$1878$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk... > Hi > > You can try something like: > > INSERT INTO Table C > SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM TABLE A > WHERE <CLAUSE TO TEST CONSTRAINT FAIL> > > INSERT INTO Table B > SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM TABLE A > WHERE <CLAUSE TO TEST CONSTRAINTS PASS> > > OR > INSERT INTO Table B > SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM TABLE A > WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM TABLE C WHERE <CLAUSE TO CHECK NOT IN C>) > > John > > "Dan" <dpratte@dpratte.com> wrote in message > news:1115474335.494377.167790@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com... >>I am loading data from table A into table B. Certain columns in B have >> check constraints. I'd like for any rows from A, which violate >> constraints, to be inserted into a third table, C. When the process is >> finished, I'll have only good rows in B, and exeption rows in C. >> >> I am investigating INSTEAD OF triggers, however my question to the >> group is, is there a better or best practice for this scenario? This >> must be common. Any high-level tips or direction will be highly >> appreciated. >> >> DAP >> > > |