I have a database being populated by hits to a program on a server.
The problem is each client connection may require a few hits in a 1-2
second time frame. This is resulting in multiple database entries -
all exactly the same, except the event_id field, which is
auto-numbered.

I need a way to query the record w/out duplicates. That is, any
records exactly the same except event_id should only return one record.

Is this possible??

Thank you,

Barry

try this, not tested :-)

SELECT *
FROM table1 a,
(SELECT min(id) FROM table1) AS b
WHERE a.id = b.id


BarrySDCA wrote:
> I have a database being populated by hits to a program on a server.
> The problem is each client connection may require a few hits in a 1-2
> second time frame. This is resulting in multiple database entries -
> all exactly the same, except the event_id field, which is
> auto-numbered.
>
> I need a way to query the record w/out duplicates. That is, any
> records exactly the same except event_id should only return one record.
>
> Is this possible??
>
> Thank you,
>
> Barry

hrm....no luck. I ran this:


SELECT * from `playback_log` a,(SELECT min(EVENT_ID) FROM
`playback_log` ) AS b WHERE a.EVENT_ID = b.EVENT_ID


Can you see anything? I appreciate the help a bunch. thank you

Haven't tested this:

SELECT *
FROM playback_log a
WHERE a.event_id = (select min(event_id) from playback_log b
where a.field1 = b.field1)
;

You will need to list as many fields as need to match the identical rows in the
where clause of the sub-select.

Thomas


BarrySDCA wrote on 03.03.2006 00:33:
> hrm....no luck. I ran this:
>
>
> SELECT * from `playback_log` a,(SELECT min(EVENT_ID) FROM
> `playback_log` ) AS b WHERE a.EVENT_ID = b.EVENT_ID
>
>
> Can you see anything? I appreciate the help a bunch. thank you
>

"Thomas Kellerer" <WVIJEVPANEHT@spammotel.com> wrote in message
news:46petmFc69qnU1@individual.net...
> SELECT *
> FROM playback_log a
> WHERE a.event_id = (select min(event_id) from playback_log b
> where a.field1 = b.field1)

Here's a similar possibility, without using a correlated subquery:

SELECT a.*
FROM playback_log AS a
WHERE a.event_id IN (
SELECT MIN(b.event_id)
FROM playpack_log AS b
GROUP BY b.field1, b.field2, b.field3, ...)

What I've seen missing in the several solutions proposed is any use of GROUP
BY. You'll need to GROUP BY all the fields of the table _except_ for
event_id.

Regards,
Bill K.

Bill Karwin (bill@karwin.com) writes:
> "Thomas Kellerer" <WVIJEVPANEHT@spammotel.com> wrote in message
> news:46petmFc69qnU1@individual.net...
>> SELECT *
>> FROM playback_log a
>> WHERE a.event_id = (select min(event_id) from playback_log b
>> where a.field1 = b.field1)
>
> Here's a similar possibility, without using a correlated subquery:
>
> SELECT a.*
> FROM playback_log AS a
> WHERE a.event_id IN (
> SELECT MIN(b.event_id)
> FROM playpack_log AS b
> GROUP BY b.field1, b.field2, b.field3, ...)
>
> What I've seen missing in the several solutions proposed is any use of
> GROUP BY. You'll need to GROUP BY all the fields of the table _except_
> for event_id.

One more variation, using a derived table:

SELECT a.*
FROM playback_log AS a
JOIN (SELECT MIN(event_id)
FROM playback_log
GROUP BY field1, field2, ...) AS b ON a.event_id = b.event_id




--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx

I'm not sure why you need a nested query as others have suggested.

I see two options:

Select Distinct blah1, blah2, [all fields except event_id], blah99
>From LoginTable

or

Select blah1, blah2, [all fields except event_id], blah99
>From LoginTable
Group by blah1, blah2, [all fields except event_id], blah99

if you want an event_id, just for kicks, you could add an aggregator:

Select blah1, blah2, max(event_id), blah99
>From LoginTable
Group by blah1, blah2, [all fields except event_id], blah99

BarrySDCA wrote:
> I have a database being populated by hits to a program on a server.
> The problem is each client connection may require a few hits in a 1-2
> second time frame. This is resulting in multiple database entries -
> all exactly the same, except the event_id field, which is
> auto-numbered.
>
> I need a way to query the record w/out duplicates. That is, any
> records exactly the same except event_id should only return one record.
>
> Is this possible??
>
> Thank you,
>
> Barry

Hopefully you found the suggestions on how to filter out the duplicates
helpful.

I just want to point out that this shows the weakness of using a
pseudokey as the primary key of a table. If they really are the same
events, they shouldn't be duplicated.

Actually, I don't think you have duplicate events, since at least some
of the connection hits must have failed or timed out. Otherwise why
were there retries? So they are not really the same. Are you maybe
missing a status or result attribute?

(but the ID field is still a poor crutch for a possibly weak design.)

just some food for thought.
Ed.

>(but the ID field is still a poor crutch for a possibly weak design.)

hmmmm. i'd prefer to think of it as the table stores ALL hits to the
table, but this particular data consumer only wants to see ONE. The
way I think about it, your natural key would be the composite of all
fields in the table; perhaps "natural", but certainly awkword.

I like figital's solution.

It's exactly what I'm doing.....I'm recording hits to an advertising
engine, before they get to the media server. Some client players hit
more than once before they connect, causing a duplicate entry. I just
want to see it sorted out w/out the duplicates. I have the
distribution server logs for accurate playback reporting, I'm only
interested in seeing cleaned up hits.

I setup code to remove the duplicates, but it's not fool proof. I will
try the suggestions here and let the group know how it goes. Here is a
link to what I'm doing:

http://www.sundiegolive.com/advertising.htm notice if two duplicates
come in now and are staggered between eachother, it shows twice still.
I will try and let you all know...

I would like to say that I didn't expect such great help from the
group. I've thrown a few questions out to different groups but usually
don't have so many great replies. Thank you everyone!