Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Microsoft SQL Server > SQL Server

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 01:30 PM
Thomas R. Hummel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Maintaining a chain with multiple inserts

Hello,

I know that this has probably been discussed, but I couldn't find
anything with Google. I have the following problem... I receive a set
of text files that describe a chain of insurance claims. Each claim may
be copied from an older claim and it may be copied to a newer claim. I
get files that give information in both directions (i.e., One file says
Claim #1 copied TO Claim #2 and another file says Claim #2 copied FROM
Claim #1). I already have something in place to validate the files
against each other.

What I need to end up with is a row for each claim that gives the
original claim number in the chain (NULL if it is an original claim),
the claim from which it was copied (NULL if none), and the claim to
which it was copied (NULL if none). The problem is that I may need to
insert claims into the middle of a chain (ok, that's not hard), and I
may also receive records in the file that have the same source claim
but multiple destination claims. These records must be changed to
create a single chain. For example, if I receive records that show 1->2
and 1->3 then this should be converted to show 1->2 and 2->3. The
business doesn't have any strong rules on how to reconcile these, so
I've decided to just go with ordering by the claim IDs when determining
order if it's otherwise unclear. Using this, I've solved the second
situation as well, but then I started to consider the situation of
receiving 1->2, 1->3, and 2->4. This should end up as 1->2, 2->3, 3->4
but I can't figure out how to do that without cursors or multiple
passes.

Below is some SQL to work with. Any suggestions are greatly
appreciated. Also, if you can think of any other situations that I
might need to handle then that would be useful as well.

Thanks,
-Tom.

CREATE TABLE Copy_To (
My_ID INT NOT NULL,
Copy_To INT NOT NULL )
GO
ALTER TABLE Copy_To ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Copy_To PRIMARY KEY (My_ID,
Copy_To)
GO

CREATE TABLE Copy_From (
My_ID INT NOT NULL,
Copy_From INT NOT NULL )
GO
ALTER TABLE Copy_From ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Copy_From PRIMARY KEY (My_ID,
Copy_From)
GO

CREATE TABLE Chain (
My_ID INT NOT NULL,
Orig_ID INT NULL,
Copy_To INT NULL,
Copy_From INT NULL )
GO
ALTER TABLE Chain ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Chain PRIMARY KEY (My_ID)
GO

INSERT INTO Copy_To VALUES (2, 3)
INSERT INTO Copy_To VALUES (2, 4)
INSERT INTO Copy_To VALUES (3, 5)
GO
INSERT INTO Copy_From VALUES (3, 2)
INSERT INTO Copy_From VALUES (4, 2)
INSERT INTO Copy_From VALUES (5, 3)
GO
-- The chain table may already have some existing rows
INSERT INTO Chain VALUES (1, NULL, 6, NULL)
INSERT INTO Chain VALUES (6, 1, NULL, 1)
GO
/*
The expected results would be rows in Chain as follows:

My_ID Orig_ID Copy_To Copy_From
1 NULL 2 NULL
2 1 3 1
3 1 4 2
4 1 5 3
5 1 6 4
6 1 NULL 5

In this case the numbers are all sequential, but that will not always
be the case. A chain could be 1->4->8 or possibly even 4->8->1->7.
*/

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 01:30 PM
John Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Maintaining a chain with multiple inserts

Hi

Your copy_to/from tables seems to be containing a hierarchy that you are
disregarding therefore they may be redundant!!!

If you had a master claimparts table then:

CREATE TABLE CLAIMPARTS ( claim char(1), part int )

INSERT INTO CLAIMPARTS ( claim , part )
SELECT 'A', 1
UNION ALL SELECT 'A', 2
UNION ALL SELECT 'A', 3
UNION ALL SELECT 'A', 4
UNION ALL SELECT 'B', 1
UNION ALL SELECT 'B', 8
UNION ALL SELECT 'B', 7
UNION ALL SELECT 'B', 3

SELECT C.CLAIM, C.PART,
(SELECT MIN(PART) FROM CLAIMPARTS P
WHERE C.PART < P.PART
AND C.CLAIM = P.CLAIM ) AS NEXTPART
FROM CLAIMPARTS C
ORDER BY C.CLAIM, C.PART

Would give you the hierarchy regardless of the previous copyto/from
information.

John

"Thomas R. Hummel" <tom_hummel@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128105505.180521.155350@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> Hello,
>
> I know that this has probably been discussed, but I couldn't find
> anything with Google. I have the following problem... I receive a set
> of text files that describe a chain of insurance claims. Each claim may
> be copied from an older claim and it may be copied to a newer claim. I
> get files that give information in both directions (i.e., One file says
> Claim #1 copied TO Claim #2 and another file says Claim #2 copied FROM
> Claim #1). I already have something in place to validate the files
> against each other.
>
> What I need to end up with is a row for each claim that gives the
> original claim number in the chain (NULL if it is an original claim),
> the claim from which it was copied (NULL if none), and the claim to
> which it was copied (NULL if none). The problem is that I may need to
> insert claims into the middle of a chain (ok, that's not hard), and I
> may also receive records in the file that have the same source claim
> but multiple destination claims. These records must be changed to
> create a single chain. For example, if I receive records that show 1->2
> and 1->3 then this should be converted to show 1->2 and 2->3. The
> business doesn't have any strong rules on how to reconcile these, so
> I've decided to just go with ordering by the claim IDs when determining
> order if it's otherwise unclear. Using this, I've solved the second
> situation as well, but then I started to consider the situation of
> receiving 1->2, 1->3, and 2->4. This should end up as 1->2, 2->3, 3->4
> but I can't figure out how to do that without cursors or multiple
> passes.
>
> Below is some SQL to work with. Any suggestions are greatly
> appreciated. Also, if you can think of any other situations that I
> might need to handle then that would be useful as well.
>
> Thanks,
> -Tom.
>
> CREATE TABLE Copy_To (
> My_ID INT NOT NULL,
> Copy_To INT NOT NULL )
> GO
> ALTER TABLE Copy_To ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Copy_To PRIMARY KEY (My_ID,
> Copy_To)
> GO
>
> CREATE TABLE Copy_From (
> My_ID INT NOT NULL,
> Copy_From INT NOT NULL )
> GO
> ALTER TABLE Copy_From ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Copy_From PRIMARY KEY (My_ID,
> Copy_From)
> GO
>
> CREATE TABLE Chain (
> My_ID INT NOT NULL,
> Orig_ID INT NULL,
> Copy_To INT NULL,
> Copy_From INT NULL )
> GO
> ALTER TABLE Chain ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Chain PRIMARY KEY (My_ID)
> GO
>
> INSERT INTO Copy_To VALUES (2, 3)
> INSERT INTO Copy_To VALUES (2, 4)
> INSERT INTO Copy_To VALUES (3, 5)
> GO
> INSERT INTO Copy_From VALUES (3, 2)
> INSERT INTO Copy_From VALUES (4, 2)
> INSERT INTO Copy_From VALUES (5, 3)
> GO
> -- The chain table may already have some existing rows
> INSERT INTO Chain VALUES (1, NULL, 6, NULL)
> INSERT INTO Chain VALUES (6, 1, NULL, 1)
> GO
> /*
> The expected results would be rows in Chain as follows:
>
> My_ID Orig_ID Copy_To Copy_From
> 1 NULL 2 NULL
> 2 1 3 1
> 3 1 4 2
> 4 1 5 3
> 5 1 6 4
> 6 1 NULL 5
>
> In this case the numbers are all sequential, but that will not always
> be the case. A chain could be 1->4->8 or possibly even 4->8->1->7.
> */
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 01:30 PM
Thomas R. Hummel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Maintaining a chain with multiple inserts

Hi John,

I think that I may have been unclear about the problem. The Copy_To and
Copy_From columns are IDs. I should have probably put foreign keys to
My_ID in my example code to make that clear. Also, the Copy_To and
Copy_From tables are direct imports of files that I receive, so I have
no control over how that information is presented. If you had a way
that I could convert those rows into something like what you have
(instead of Claim and Part I would basically have the Orig_ID and
My_ID) then that would probably solve my problem.

Thanks,
-Tom.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 01:30 PM
John Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Maintaining a chain with multiple inserts

Hi Thomas

This gives you the results you wanted, but if you have more than one chain
you will need a means of identifying them.

CREATE VIEW AllIds AS
SELECT My_Id FROM Chain
UNION SELECT My_Id FROM Copy_To
UNION SELECT My_Id FROM Copy_From

SELECT I.My_Id,
CASE WHEN I.My_Id = C.My_Id THEN C.Orig_ID ELSE C.My_Id END AS Orig_ID,
CASE WHEN I.My_Id = C.Copy_to THEN E.Copy_to ELSE (SELECT MIN(My_Id) FROM
AllIds P WHERE I.My_Id < P.My_Id) END AS Copy_To,
CASE WHEN I.My_Id = C.My_Id THEN C.Copy_From ELSE (SELECT MAX(My_Id) FROM
AllIds P WHERE I.My_Id > P.My_Id) END AS Copy_from
FROM AllIds I
JOIN Chain C ON C.My_Id <= I.My_Id AND C.Copy_to >= I.My_Id
JOIN Chain E ON C.Copy_to = E.My_Id AND E.Orig_id = C.My_id
ORDER BY I.My_Id

John


"Thomas R. Hummel" <tom_hummel@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128138055.333646.242360@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Hi John,
>
> I think that I may have been unclear about the problem. The Copy_To and
> Copy_From columns are IDs. I should have probably put foreign keys to
> My_ID in my example code to make that clear. Also, the Copy_To and
> Copy_From tables are direct imports of files that I receive, so I have
> no control over how that information is presented. If you had a way
> that I could convert those rows into something like what you have
> (instead of Claim and Part I would basically have the Orig_ID and
> My_ID) then that would probably solve my problem.
>
> Thanks,
> -Tom.
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 01:30 PM
Thomas R. Hummel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Maintaining a chain with multiple inserts

John Bell wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> This gives you the results you wanted, but if you have more than one chain
> you will need a means of identifying them.


Unfortunately, that's perhaps the biggest problem that I have. The only
way to determine that a row in Copy_To or Copy_From is in a chain with
another row is to follow the links. Once the rows are in the Chain
table the Orig_ID can be used to distinguish all chains.

I'll play around with the code that you included and see if I can get
something worked out. Unfortunately, I think that I'm going to be stuck
recursing through the chains to link them together.

Thanks for all of your help!

-Tom.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 01:30 PM
John Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Maintaining a chain with multiple inserts

Hi

If your ranges do not overlap then you should be able to cope with the query
I posted use c.my_id as the chains identifier as your orig_id was NULL or
the first entry.

John


"Thomas R. Hummel" <tom_hummel@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128177507.802681.287910@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
> John Bell wrote:
>> Hi Thomas
>>
>> This gives you the results you wanted, but if you have more than one
>> chain
>> you will need a means of identifying them.

>
> Unfortunately, that's perhaps the biggest problem that I have. The only
> way to determine that a row in Copy_To or Copy_From is in a chain with
> another row is to follow the links. Once the rows are in the Chain
> table the Orig_ID can be used to distinguish all chains.
>
> I'll play around with the code that you included and see if I can get
> something worked out. Unfortunately, I think that I'm going to be stuck
> recursing through the chains to link them together.
>
> Thanks for all of your help!
>
> -Tom.
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 01:33 PM
Thomas R. Hummel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Maintaining a chain with multiple inserts

I've come up with a solution to the problem which I thought might be
useful for others. My problem was that I kept trying to find different
ways to force the data into the same structure. Finally it occurred to
me to look for a better model that is easier to work with.

I came up with the following:

CREATE TABLE Chain (
My_ID INT NOT NULL,
Orig_ID INT NOT NULL,
Level INT NOT NULL)
GO
ALTER TABLE Chain ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Chain PRIMARY KEY (My_ID)
GO

Now, converting the data is fairly quick and simple. First I add in all
of the "base" claims. Those are any claims that aren't copied from
somewhere else:

INSERT INTO Chain (My_ID, Orig_ID, Level)
SELECT CT1.My_ID, CT1.My_ID, 0
FROM Copy_To CT1
LEFT OUTER JOIN Copy_To CT2 ON CT2.Copy_To = CT1.My_ID
WHERE CT2.My_ID IS NULL

Once the base claims are added I add each new level in a loop until
there are no levels left:

DECLARE @ins_count INT
SET @ins_count = 1
WHILE (@ins_count > 0)
BEGIN
INSERT INTO Chain (My_ID, Orig_ID, Level)
SELECT
MIN(CF.My_ID),
C1.Orig_ID,
SQ.Max_Level + 1
FROM Copy_From CF
INNER JOIN Chain C1 ON C1.Orig_ID = CF.Copy_From
INNER JOIN (SELECT Orig_ID, MAX(Level) AS Max_Level
FROM Chain
GROUP BY Orig_ID) SQ ON SQ.Orig_ID = C1.Orig_ID
LEFT OUTER JOIN Chain C2 ON C2.My_ID = CF.My_ID
WHERE C2.My_ID IS NULL
GROUP BY C1.Orig_ID, SQ.Max_Level

SELECT @ins_count = @@ROWCOUNT
END

This logic handles all of the various problems with the data such as a
single claim being copied to multiple destination claims. The one
problem that it doesn't handle is a claim which is copied FROM multiple
claims, but this is an unresolvable error condition, so I find those
rows and move them to an error table ahead of time.

To improve performance I made a unique clustered index for Chain on the
Orig_ID and Level.

Getting the data that I need is fast and easy from this table as well:

SELECT C.My_ID, C.Orig_ID, CF.My_ID AS Copy_From, CT.My_ID AS Copy_To
FROM Chain C
LEFT OUTER JOIN Chain CF ON CF.Orig_ID = C.Orig_ID AND CF.Level =
C.Level - 1
LEFT OUTER JOIN Chain CT ON CT.Orig_ID = C.Orig_ID AND CT.Level =
C.Level + 1

-Tom.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763