Unix Technical Forum

New server setup and RAID recommendation

This is a discussion on New server setup and RAID recommendation within the SQL Server forums, part of the Microsoft SQL Server category; --> I have a database that is around 2 to 4 GB. If I were to estimate some numbers like ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Microsoft SQL Server > SQL Server

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 07:25 PM
serge
 
Posts: n/a
Default New server setup and RAID recommendation

I have a database that is around 2 to 4 GB.
If I were to estimate some numbers like 4x growth or
even 10x, the database size could reach 40GB.
The new server will be running SQL Server 2005.

I am not sure which configuration option to take.
I've gathered some information from different places:

Configuration #1:
OS - Raid1 2x36GB
Logs - Raid1 2x36GB
Data - Raid 5 4x73GB


Configuration #2:
OS - Raid1 2x36GB
Logs - Raid5 (not sure how many drives)
Data - Raid5 (not sure how many drives)


Now if I am using a separate RAID array disks
for the database's transaction log, should I also put the
TempDB in this RAID also?

Here's the configuration I am thinking of right now.
Please give me your comments:

OS - Raid1 2x36GB
Logs & TempDB - Raid5 3x36GB = 2x36GB usable space
Data - Raid5 3x73GB = 2x73GB usable space

If you have other configurations you recommend please let
me know.


Thank you


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 07:25 PM
LLik
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: New server setup and RAID recommendation

For the install and forget about I want protection and speed at a low
cost use RAID 5 for everything.

Now if you want the best performance and protect for the type of work
being done use the follow.

For the system files and executables, reading binaries doesn't really
put much overhead on the servers, so it is not a major concern. Any
RAID level could be used.

For data files, RAID 1 is preferable because it gives the best tradeoff
between performance, protection and cost. Because it is 100 percent
redundant, it both protects the data and the availability of your
system. Availability is the reason that you for using RAID with a
database, and even the loss of a small internal database can bring down
the database server. In this case, you will not lose any data but the
users will have to live without your system. If performance and
security are your major factors then RAID 10 should be used. No matter
what RAID level is used each RAID array should have as many physical
disks in the array as the controller will support. This allows reads
and writes to be performed simultaneously on each physical drive in the
array, significantly boosting disk I/O.

Log files, by their nature, are mostly written to, which means that
often RAID 1 is your best choice for performance. As with the
database files if performance and security are your major issues RAID
10 should be used.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com