vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I have a distributed inventory control database that I am going to migrate from Access to SQL Server. I am going to use SQL Server Replication to keep the data current. There will one SQL Server 2000 database at HeadOffice, and about 200 branches will each have MSDE 2000. For tables that are the same for each branch (e.g. StockItems, Suppliers), I'm going to use Transactional replication with the HeadOffice as Publisher. There is no need for Merge replication, because only HeadOffice will be changing this data. For tables that are updated at the branches (e.g. deliveries, sales), there shouldn't be any conflicts either, as each branch will only update data that is specific to it. So, transactional replication with the Branches as Publishers seems like the answer. BUT, MSDE 2000 only handles merge replication as a publisher, so it looks like I'm going to have to use Merge Replication if I'm am going to use MSDE. Question: Do you think that it worth buying a full SQL Server licenses for each branch, so that I can use Transactional replication with the branches as publishers. Or, should I stick with MSDE 2000 and Merge replication. Also, are there any other reasons why MSDE won't be adequate as the database at the branches. Thanks, Craig |