Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Microsoft SQL Server > SQL Server

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2008, 02:49 PM
wfsmith@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Using a "match" table to store multiple columns for parent data

Sorry for the confusing subject. Here's what im doing:

I have a table of products. Products have N categories and
subcategories. Right now its 4. But there could be more down the
line so it needs to be extensible.

So ive created a product table. Then a category table that has many
categories of products, of which a product can belong to N number of
these categories. Finally a ProductCategory "match" table.

This is pretty straigth forward. But im getting confused as to how to
write views/sprocs to pull out rows of products that list all the
products categories as columns in a single query view.

For example:

lets say productId 1 is Cap'n Crunch cereal. It is in 3 categories:
Cereal, Food for Kids, Crunchy food, and Boxed.

So we have:

Product
----------------
1 Capn Crunch

Categories
-----------------
1 Cereal
2 Food for Kids
3 Crunchy food
4 Boxed

ProductCategories
------------------
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4

How do I go about writing a query that returns a single result set for
a view or data set (for use in a GridView control) where I would have
the following result:

Product results
---------------------------------
ProductId ProductName Category 1 Category 2
Category 3 Category N ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Capn Crunch Cereal Food for Kids Crunchy food
Boxed


Am I just thinking about this all wrong? Sure seems like it.

Cheers,

Will
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2008, 02:49 PM
Erland Sommarskog
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Using a "match" table to store multiple columns for parent data

(wfsmith@gmail.com) writes:
> I have a table of products. Products have N categories and
> subcategories. Right now its 4. But there could be more down the
> line so it needs to be extensible.


As we shall see, you may want to wait with that part.

> Product
> ----------------
> 1 Capn Crunch
>
> Categories
> -----------------
> 1 Cereal
> 2 Food for Kids
> 3 Crunchy food
> 4 Boxed
>
> ProductCategories
> ------------------
> 1 1
> 1 2
> 1 3
> 1 4
>
> How do I go about writing a query that returns a single result set for
> a view or data set (for use in a GridView control) where I would have
> the following result:


SELECT P.ProductName,
Category1 = MAX(CASE C.rowno WHEN 1 THEN C.CategoryName END),
Category2 = MAX(CASE C.rowno WHEN 2 THEN C.CategoryName END),
Category3 = MAX(CASE C.rowno WHEN 3 THEN C.CategoryName END),
Category4 = MAX(CASE C.rowno WHEN 4 THEN C.CategoryName END)
FROM Products P
JOIN (SELECT C.CategoryName,
rowno = row_number() OVER(PARTITON BY PC.ProductID
ORDER BY C.CategoryName)
FROM ProductCategories PC
JOIN Categories C ON PC.CategoryID = C.CategoryID) AS C
ON P.ProductID = C.ProductID
GROUP BY P.ProductName

If you want more product categories, you will need to extend the query.
If you want to handle an unknown number of categories, you would need
to use dynamic SQL to build the query, considerably increasing the
complexity of the task.

The key point here is that a SELECT statement returns a table, and a
table always has a well-defined set of columns.


--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2008, 02:49 PM
steve11228@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Using a "match" table to store multiple columns for parent data

On Feb 27, 2:02 pm, wfsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sorry for the confusing subject. Here's what im doing:


If by chance you're still doing what you were doing (going in
circles? you can straighten out your trajectory with some help from
the Rac utility. Rac will easily produce any kind of dynamic crosstab
with no sql coding. We only require you to figure out what result you
want not how to do it
Visit Rac @
www.rac4sql.net

www.beyondsql.blogspot.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 02:04 PM
wfsmith@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Using a "match" table to store multiple columns for parent data

> SELECT P.ProductName,
> Category1 = MAX(CASE C.rowno WHEN 1 THEN C.CategoryName END),
> Category2 = MAX(CASE C.rowno WHEN 2 THEN C.CategoryName END),
> Category3 = MAX(CASE C.rowno WHEN 3 THEN C.CategoryName END),
> Category4 = MAX(CASE C.rowno WHEN 4 THEN C.CategoryName END)
> FROM Products P
> JOIN (SELECT C.CategoryName,
> rowno = row_number() OVER(PARTITON BY PC.ProductID
> ORDER BY C.CategoryName)
> FROM ProductCategories PC
> JOIN Categories C ON PC.CategoryID = C.CategoryID) AS C
> ON P.ProductID = C.ProductID
> GROUP BY P.ProductName
>
> If you want more product categories, you will need to extend the query.
> If you want to handle an unknown number of categories, you would need
> to use dynamic SQL to build the query, considerably increasing the
> complexity of the task.


Thank you very much for the well-thought response Erland.

Performance-wise, would it be better to go this route or simply return
multiple record sets? E.g.

Select Products.* From Products
Select * from ProductCategories PC JOIN Categories C ON PC.CategoryID
= C.CategoryID

....and then just handle the different recordsets using a DataSet or
whatever on the code side?

I'm imagining a new table of, say, Vendors, or other tables that also
contain multiple rows of data that pertain to a single Product. The
above approach seems like it would get complex in a hurry.

Cheers
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 02:04 PM
Erland Sommarskog
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Using a "match" table to store multiple columns for parent data

(wfsmith@gmail.com) writes:
> Performance-wise, would it be better to go this route or simply return
> multiple record sets? E.g.
>
> Select Products.* From Products
> Select * from ProductCategories PC JOIN Categories C ON PC.CategoryID
>= C.CategoryID
>
> ...and then just handle the different recordsets using a DataSet or
> whatever on the code side?


If I understand your scenario I don't think there is much difference
in performance, although SQL Server will have to do some more work
with my approach. But if you are to get multiple result sets, you
would have to bounce the data around in the client code, to get your
grids as desired. That sounds like a lot of coding to me.

Then again, if you want to support any number of categories, it may be
better to do the pivoting client-side.



--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 <