This is a discussion on MS SQL 2000 Standard Edition Capability within the SQL Server Data Warehousing forums, part of the Microsoft SQL Server category; --> Hi, I'm about to build data warehouse of approx 15 Gb. The biggest table is expected to be of ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| Standard edition from memory only supports up to 2Gb of memory. This might prove problematic depending on how the wareohuse is used. "Alexander Zotkin" <a@a> wrote in message news:emLy0OSDFHA.2220@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Hi, > I'm about to build data warehouse of approx 15 Gb. The biggest table is > expected to be of 10 000 000 records. How will MS SQL 2000 Standard > Edition > cope with it? > > Thanks, > Alex > > |
| |||
| Hi, Scott, you are wrong. If Sql Server Standard Edition is running on Windows 2000 Advance Server or Windows 2003 Server and /3GB switch is on in boot.ini, Sql Server Standard Edition support up to 3GB. It’s really a small data warehouse. If you don’t break data warehouse rules in design and you will create necessary indexes, it will work ok. Tomasz B. "Scott Delaney" wrote: > Standard edition from memory only supports up to 2Gb of memory. This might > prove problematic depending on how the wareohuse is used. > > > "Alexander Zotkin" <a@a> wrote in message > news:emLy0OSDFHA.2220@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > Hi, > > I'm about to build data warehouse of approx 15 Gb. The biggest table is > > expected to be of 10 000 000 records. How will MS SQL 2000 Standard > > Edition > > cope with it? > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > > > > |
| |||
| I doubt if you will have any problems. 10M fact records is a very small database. Unless there are other issues, such as several large dimensions, you will be fine with Standard Edition. As you get into more complex applications, you might start reading and thinking about the various best practices outlined in the following two Guides: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../anservog.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../ansvcspg.mspx -- Dave Wickert [MSFT] dwickert@online.microsoft.com Program Manager BI SystemsTeam SQL BI Product Unit (Analysis Services) -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Alexander Zotkin" <a@a> wrote in message news:emLy0OSDFHA.2220@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Hi, > I'm about to build data warehouse of approx 15 Gb. The biggest table is > expected to be of 10 000 000 records. How will MS SQL 2000 Standard Edition > cope with it? > > Thanks, > Alex > > |
| ||||
| Actually Tomasz you are incorrect and Scott is correct. While it is true that you can enable the /3GB switch SQL Standard is hardcoded to not go above 2GB. Alex, It all boils down to requirements and expectations but with a reasonable design and proper indexing a 15GB warehouse is well within SQL Standards capability. Ray "Tomasz Borawski" <TomaszBorawski@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:C4C34AFB-6747-4CD9-BB7B-12CE782BAED0@microsoft.com... > Hi, > > Scott, you are wrong. If Sql Server Standard Edition is running on Windows > 2000 Advance Server or Windows 2003 Server and /3GB switch is on in > boot.ini, > Sql Server Standard Edition support up to 3GB. > > It's really a small data warehouse. If you don't break data warehouse > rules > in design and you will create necessary indexes, it will work ok. > > Tomasz B. > > "Scott Delaney" wrote: > >> Standard edition from memory only supports up to 2Gb of memory. This >> might >> prove problematic depending on how the wareohuse is used. >> >> >> "Alexander Zotkin" <a@a> wrote in message >> news:emLy0OSDFHA.2220@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >> > Hi, >> > I'm about to build data warehouse of approx 15 Gb. The biggest table >> > is >> > expected to be of 10 000 000 records. How will MS SQL 2000 Standard >> > Edition >> > cope with it? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Alex >> > >> > >> >> >> > |