vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| There is not possible to lower the thread priority with SQL Server's tools. But there is an extended procedure that can lower the priority of the current thread presented in "The Guru's Guide to SQL Server Stored Procedures, XML, and HTML" by Ken Henderson. -- Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP FAQ from Neil & others at: http://www.sqlserverfaq.com Please reply only to the newsgroups. PASS - the definitive, global community for SQL Server professionals - http://www.sqlpass.org "Henry Stock" <hstock@onproject.com> wrote in message news:OMlOOoKQDHA.1072@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > We have recently experienced an issue where operations hitting one database > on a server were adversely effected by operations taking place on another > database on the same server. Specifically they were restoring a 16GB > database while we were trying to run a demo of a client server application. > > The client server app died because the restore was absorbing all the system > resources. While we can address this procedurally to some extent, I want to > find out if there are ways to specify to the server that certain operations > should be given a lower priority and other operations higher. The restore > operation in my mind should be a back ground job, that runs only when the > system is not being used by other operations. But I don't know if that is > possible to control. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > -- > Henry Stock, Network Administrator > onProject.com > 3 Wing Drive > Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927-1006 > > |