This is a discussion on ODBC Connection Fails 2x/Month within the MS SQL ODBC forums, part of the Microsoft SQL Server category; --> Hello all, I am using SQL 2000 enterprise edition on a two machine cluster. Everything is gigabit based network ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello all, I am using SQL 2000 enterprise edition on a two machine cluster. Everything is gigabit based network capacity. The servers are dual processor, and over a gig of RAM each. I am using a large disk array between the two machines 0.13 TB capcity. We are using a software package call CIMPLICITY to datalog information from our production floor machinery. This information comes very quickly, 15 SQL statements / .25 sec. Over 700 points of information are logged at a 5 second interval. Twice a month the connection from CIMPLICITY fails and the entire datalogging system reports a massive number of connection failure attempts against the SQL databases. I am getting nothing on the SQL side reporting these rejected connection attempts that I can see. The windows event log is empty as well. The only way to get the datalogging system back online is to restert the datalogging machine. Once this is done 90% of the time the datalogging will continue as if nothing happened. Any thoughts? One of my developers suggests that the ODBC connection can be overwelmed with information and can reject futher communications until a restart happens. We have perhaps 5- 7 open connections through for this machine in the SQL enterprise manager. Each for a different location that the datalogging machine is connected to. Can one of these be fouled, which then causes a failure of them all? Is this not making any sense to anyone else? It sounds to me like the datalogging machine is catching a busy signal from SQL and then forever after will reject attempts to reuse that communication line. Remember this only happens once every two months. The chances of catching it in an analyzer is remote. I probably could catch the after affects of the disconnection, but I havn't been successful as of yet in getting anything. Any more thoughts? Thanks cjones |