vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello List, I have this table that has a single row in it: CREATETABLE `quicktable` ( `x` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `quick_id` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', PRIMARY KEY (`x`) ) ENGINE=InnoDBAUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 select * from quicktable; +---+----------+ | x | quick_id | +---+----------+ | 1 | 0 | +---+----------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) I have a large number of connections executing these queries: BEGIN: SELECT quick_id FROM quicktable FOR UPDATE; COMMIT; This works well until I hit a large number of concurrent connections (around 200), when I start getting deadlocks. Despite the fact, that I'm only selecting a single table. Here is the deadlock section from SHOW INNODB STATUS; ------------------------ LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK ------------------------ 071015 20:22:35 *** (1) TRANSACTION: TRANSACTION 0 79790779, ACTIVE 2 sec, process no 7658, OS thread id 1185077584 starting index read mysql tables in use 1, locked 1 LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 368 MySQL thread id 3961, query id 2102790 10.1.10.122 bnewton statistics SELECT x, quick_id FROMquicktable WHERE x=1 FOR UPDATE *** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED: RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 540674 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY`of table `test/quicktable` trx id 0 79790779 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex000004c14f74; asc Ot;; 2: len 7; hex 0000098005054d; asc M;; 3: len 4; hex 8018f9fd; asc ;; *** (2) TRANSACTION: TRANSACTION 0 79790775, ACTIVE 2 sec, process no 7658, OS thread id 1191733584 2 lockstruct(s), heap size 368 MySQL thread id 4094, query id 2102743 10.1.10.122 bnewton *** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S): RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 540674 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table `test/quicktable` trx id 0 79790775 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000004c14f74; asc Ot;; 2: len 7; hex 0000098005054d; asc M;; 3: len 4; hex 8018f9fd; asc ;; *** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED: RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 540674 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table `test/quicktable` trx id 0 79791014 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000004c14f74; asc Ot;; 2: len 7; hex 0000098005054d; asc M;; 3: len 4; hex 8018f9fd; asc ;; TOO DEEP OR LONG SEARCH IN THE LOCK TABLE WAITS-FOR GRAPH *** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2) Can anyone explain whats going on? Is there a limit for the number of concurrent transactions, before looking at the lock graph becomes too expensive? Is that documented somewhere? Thanks, William Newton __________________________________________________ __________________________________ Looking for a deal? Findgreat prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. http://farechase.yahoo.com/ |
| ||||
| Hi William, William Newton wrote: > Hello List, > > I have this table that has a single row in it: > > CREATE TABLE `quicktable` ( > `x` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, > `quick_id` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', > PRIMARY KEY (`x`) > ) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 > > select * from quicktable; > +---+----------+ > | x | quick_id | > +---+----------+ > | 1 | 0 | > +---+----------+ > 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > I have a large number of connections executing these queries: > > BEGIN: > SELECT quick_id FROM quicktable FOR UPDATE; > COMMIT; > > This > works well until I hit a large number of concurrent connections (around > 200), when I start getting deadlocks. Despite the fact, that I'm only > selecting a single table. Here is the deadlock section from SHOW INNODB > STATUS; > > ------------------------ > LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK > ------------------------ > 071015 20:22:35 > *** (1) TRANSACTION: > TRANSACTION 0 79790779, ACTIVE 2 sec, process no 7658, OS thread id 1185077584 starting index read > mysql tables in use 1, locked 1 > LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 368 > MySQL thread id 3961, query id 2102790 10.1.10.122 bnewton statistics > SELECT x, quick_id FROM quicktable WHERE x=1 FOR UPDATE > *** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED: > RECORD > LOCKS space id 0 page no 540674 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table > `test/quicktable` trx id 0 79790779 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap > waiting > Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 > 0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000004c14f74; asc Ot;; 2: len 7; hex 0000098005054d; > asc M;; 3: len 4; hex 8018f9fd; asc ;; > > *** (2) TRANSACTION: > TRANSACTION 0 79790775, ACTIVE 2 sec, process no 7658, OS thread id 1191733584 > 2 lock struct(s), heap size 368 > MySQL thread id 4094, query id 2102743 10.1.10.122 bnewton > *** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S): > RECORD > LOCKS space id 0 page no 540674 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table > `test/quicktable` trx id 0 79790775 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap > Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 > 0: > len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000004c14f74; asc > Ot;; 2: len 7; hex 0000098005054d; asc M;; 3: len 4; hex > 8018f9fd; asc ;; > > *** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED: > RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 540674 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table `test/quicktable` > trx id 0 79791014 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting > Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0 > 0: > len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;; 1: len 6; hex 000004c14f74; asc > Ot;; 2: len 7; hex 0000098005054d; asc M;; 3: len 4; hex > 8018f9fd; asc ;; > > TOO DEEP OR LONG SEARCH IN THE LOCK TABLE WAITS-FOR GRAPH > *** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2) > > > Can > anyone explain whats going on? Is there a limit for the number of > concurrent transactions, before looking at the lock graph becomes too > expensive? Is that documented somewhere? It's not documented, but yes there's both a maximum number of steps to check for a cycle in the waits-for graph, and a maximum depth of checking it: http://dev.mysql.com/sources/doxygen...ce.html#l00052 00046 /* Restricts the length of search we will do in the waits-for 00047 graph of transactions */ 00048 #define LOCK_MAX_N_STEPS_IN_DEADLOCK_CHECK 1000000 00049 00050 /* Restricts the recursion depth of the search we will do in the waits-for 00051 graph of transactions */ 00052 #define LOCK_MAX_DEPTH_IN_DEADLOCK_CHECK 200 This is the price you pay for instant deadlock detection, as opposed to just lock wait timeout (the method a lot of other transactional systems take). You could recompile with a higher number if you want. It would be nice if this were configurable; you could submit a feature request for that. Baron |