Re: sp_placeobject of image types reported as dbcc soft faults ??
This is a discussion on Re: sp_placeobject of image types reported as dbcc soft faults ?? within the Sybase forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> newbie wrote: > > All of the tables mentioned below have an image data type column in them > ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-08-2008, 02:50 PM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: sp_placeobject of image types reported as dbcc soft faults ?? newbie wrote: > > All of the tables mentioned below have an image data type column in them > where the image columns are placed on a separate segment ( image_segment > ) from the table's segment ( default segment ). > > 1) Is this normal for dbcc to report as soft faults ? Sorry .. I meant "suspect condition" > 2) Why doesn't dbcc "know" that the image types are on a separate > segment and should therefore _not_ even report them as soft faults ? > Why doesn't dbcc "know" that the image types are on a separate segment and should therefore _not_ even report them as "suspect condition" ?      |
 |
« remote monitoring of ase servers
|
Re: sp_placeobject of image types reported as dbcc soft faults ?? »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:52 AM.
