Frog wrote:

> Daniel Morgan <damorgan@exxesolutions.com> wrote
>
> > If Larry wants it Larry will get it.
>
> Isn't Larry the prick who said: "Winning is not the most important
> thing, what's important is that everyone else loses."?
>
> > Antitrust won't get involved as long
> > as SAP, Siebel and BAAN exist.
>
> Are you saying that Siebel and Baan offer the same broad sweep of
> applications as the Big Three (SAP, PSFT and ORCL)? Your argument is
> flawed and will not be acepted by DoJ.
>
> > And Larry's friend Bill is working on
> > a product or two too.
>
> Great Plains is nowhere yet. And given MSFT's recent lacklustre
> performance everywhere outside their monopoly playpen, it may never
> amount to much.
>
> > Go for it Larry. And after you've bought it ...
> > close 'em down. Daniel Morgan
> > damorgan@u.washington.edu
>
> Well, what a selfish, myopic turd you are, Mr Morgan! If Leisuresuit
> Larry buys PSFT, I shall be out of work. In fact I many never work in
> IT again. I shall lose my house, my car, my career and my entire
> working future. My family will suffer terrible stress and hardship. So
> will thousands of the people employed by PeopleSoft and their
> implementation partners. Jerk.

That someone that can't post in a usenet group without using inappropriate
language might lose their job hardly fills me with angst. The English
language is rich. Try using words you'd have the courage or civility to
use if you were standing in front of someone rather than hiding behind a
browser.

But if you think the DOJ is going to protect you stand in line behind all
of those people protected from Enron, WorldCom, etc.

--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/e...ad/oad_crs.asp
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

Frog wrote:

> "Daniel Morgan" <damorgan@u.washington.edu> flustered:
>
> > That someone that can't post
>
> "That someone who can't post", it should be. So now we know you have
> bad grammar as well as bad judgement, Mr Morgan.
>
> > in a usenet group without using
> > inappropriate language might lose
> > their job hardly fills me with angst.
>
> Anyone who calls for Larry to "close 'em down", as you did, having no
> regard for the thousands of lives destroyed through job losses, is, as
> I stated, a MYOPIC, SELFISH TURD. I find that description most
> appropriate, and I think I can find many other people who agree with
> me.
>
> > The English language is rich. Try using
> > words you'd have the courage or civility to
> > use if you were standing in front of someone
> > rather than hiding behind a browser.
>
> I would use exactly the same pejoratives if face to face with you,
> jerk.
>
> > But if you think the DOJ is going to protect
> > you stand in line behind all of those people
> > protected from Enron, WorldCom, etc.
>
> Two wrongs do not make a right.

No but they do make a kill file entry. Goodbye!

--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/e...ad/oad_crs.asp
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

"Daniel Moron" <damorgan9i@yahoo.com> wrote

> No but they do make a kill file entry. Goodbye!

Wow! I'm simply devastated.

I notice you had no cogent responses to my points, just as I expected.
Jerk.

Organ Morgan <damorgan9i@yahoo.com> wrote in news:EQBUMH7B37804.9346643519
@Gilgamesh-frog.org:

> "Daniel Moron" <damorgan9i@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>> No but they do make a kill file entry. Goodbye!
>
> Wow! I'm simply devastated.
>
> I notice you had no cogent responses to my points, just as I expected.
> Jerk.
>
another cordial resolution to a MIS discussion thread

"Mr. Cordial" <Mr.Cordial@Mr.Cordial.com> wrote in
news:Xns93AC916F12A87ausoundixnetcomcom@198.99.146 .18:

> another cordial resolution to a MIS discussion thread

Gosh, if we can have civility in NG's, how can there really be whirled
peas?
--
Pablo Sanchez, Blueoak Database Engineering
http://www.blueoakdb.com

Frog <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:<ZOU7BC9Y37804.7931018519@Gilgamesh-frog.org>...
> "Daniel Morgan" <damorgan@u.washington.edu> flustered:
>
> > That someone that can't post
>
> "That someone who can't post", it should be. So now we know you have
> bad grammar as well as bad judgement, Mr Morgan.
>
> > in a usenet group without using
> > inappropriate language might lose
> > their job hardly fills me with angst.
>
> Anyone who calls for Larry to "close 'em down", as you did, having no
> regard for the thousands of lives destroyed through job losses, is, as
> I stated, a MYOPIC, SELFISH TURD. I find that description most
> appropriate, and I think I can find many other people who agree with
> me.

Oh grow up. If you aren't prepared to be pounding the pavement for
six months with no notice, you aren't prepared. I for one think there
should be laws preventing such things, having gone through it numerous
times now, but I look at places that have such laws and have second
thoughts. A few of the times it basically cost me a Corvette - and
some have been grossly illegal, but the practicalities of the
legalities have made even that moot. It seems strange to me that
Daniel has such an attitude given what Boeing et al in his area have
gone through, but he has every right to express his opinion. Just as
you have every right to call him a prick. Too bad that won't make
either of you understand persuasiveness (as if I'm one to talk :-) .

>
> > The English language is rich. Try using
> > words you'd have the courage or civility to
> > use if you were standing in front of someone
> > rather than hiding behind a browser.
>
> I would use exactly the same pejoratives if face to face with you,
> jerk.

Unfortunately for you, you have now used the perjoratives towards
everyone reading this for all time to come. Will anybody care?
Probably not.

>
> > But if you think the DOJ is going to protect
> > you stand in line behind all of those people
> > protected from Enron, WorldCom, etc.
>
> Two wrongs do not make a right.


jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
"But three do." - Deteriorata