Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql General

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:57 PM
Daniel Schuchardt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Delphi - Developers start develop Access components for Postgres?

Hy,

in thread "Adventures in Quest for GUI RAD" there awnsered some Delphi -
Developers.
We actually use Delphi to access PostgreSQL too. But with some problems:

The older Versions of microolab postgresql dac are absolutely trash. I
haven't tried the newer ones.
ODBC / Delphi BDE is ripped out by Borland.
ADO is Microsoft and we look for a not Microsoft dependend product
because are application also runs on unix (with Kylix).
dbexpress is really hard to handle; I dont have extended experience with
DBExpress and vitavoom - dbexpress driver. (www.vitavoom.com).

we use zeos but the older version because of we found many problems in
6.X - Versions. I have fixed up many bugs in zeos 5.4 so it now works
fine with postgres.(7.3-8 running) All in all i have to say Zeos works
but i'm not really happy with zeos because it seems not clear if it has
a future.

Components are very inefficient, every time you open a table all
configuration / table meta data is fetched. No internal caching or sth
like this. (they are still faster than dbexpress / odbc / Zeos6.X)
Fields with unknown length are mapped wrong.
and so on-

With Zeos 6.X you cannot use Postgresql - search path because 6.X
Versions always wrote schema name before table name. 6.X does not
support Cursor Fetch. 6.X isn't speacially for postgres, they try to
support all bigger databases.

Has anyone tried .net - pgsql - driver with Delphi 2005?

All in all my opinion is that there is no really good solution to access
Postgres from Delphi.

Perhaps we should start a project at pgfoundry "PostgreSQL - Access for
Delphi".

Opinions?

Daniel.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:58 PM
Zlatko Matic
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Delphi - Developers start develop Access components for Postgres?

What about Lazarus Has anybody tried working with Lazarus?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Schuchardt" <daniel_schuchardt@web.de>
To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:27 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Delphi - Developers start develop Access components for
Postgres?


> Hy,
>
> in thread "Adventures in Quest for GUI RAD" there awnsered some Delphi -
> Developers.
> We actually use Delphi to access PostgreSQL too. But with some problems:
>
> The older Versions of microolab postgresql dac are absolutely trash. I
> haven't tried the newer ones.
> ODBC / Delphi BDE is ripped out by Borland.
> ADO is Microsoft and we look for a not Microsoft dependend product because
> are application also runs on unix (with Kylix).
> dbexpress is really hard to handle; I dont have extended experience with
> DBExpress and vitavoom - dbexpress driver. (www.vitavoom.com).
>
> we use zeos but the older version because of we found many problems in
> 6.X - Versions. I have fixed up many bugs in zeos 5.4 so it now works fine
> with postgres.(7.3-8 running) All in all i have to say Zeos works but i'm
> not really happy with zeos because it seems not clear if it has a future.
>
> Components are very inefficient, every time you open a table all
> configuration / table meta data is fetched. No internal caching or sth
> like this. (they are still faster than dbexpress / odbc / Zeos6.X)
> Fields with unknown length are mapped wrong.
> and so on-
>
> With Zeos 6.X you cannot use Postgresql - search path because 6.X Versions
> always wrote schema name before table name. 6.X does not support Cursor
> Fetch. 6.X isn't speacially for postgres, they try to support all bigger
> databases.
>
> Has anyone tried .net - pgsql - driver with Delphi 2005?
>
> All in all my opinion is that there is no really good solution to access
> Postgres from Delphi.
>
> Perhaps we should start a project at pgfoundry "PostgreSQL - Access for
> Delphi".
>
> Opinions?
>
> Daniel.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:58 PM
Daniel Schuchardt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Delphi - Developers start develop Access components for Postgres?

Me not.

The problem with lazarus is that they don't support many third party
components. We use havily Teechart and Developer Express in our software
so Lazarus isn't a choice for us.

Daniel

Zlatko Matic schrieb:

> What about Lazarus Has anybody tried working with Lazarus?
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Schuchardt"
> <daniel_schuchardt@web.de>
> To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 2:27 PM
> Subject: [GENERAL] Delphi - Developers start develop Access components
> for Postgres?
>
>
>> Hy,
>>
>> in thread "Adventures in Quest for GUI RAD" there awnsered some
>> Delphi - Developers.
>> We actually use Delphi to access PostgreSQL too. But with some problems:
>>
>> The older Versions of microolab postgresql dac are absolutely trash.
>> I haven't tried the newer ones.
>> ODBC / Delphi BDE is ripped out by Borland.
>> ADO is Microsoft and we look for a not Microsoft dependend product
>> because are application also runs on unix (with Kylix).
>> dbexpress is really hard to handle; I dont have extended experience
>> with DBExpress and vitavoom - dbexpress driver. (www.vitavoom.com).
>>
>> we use zeos but the older version because of we found many problems
>> in 6.X - Versions. I have fixed up many bugs in zeos 5.4 so it now
>> works fine with postgres.(7.3-8 running) All in all i have to say
>> Zeos works but i'm not really happy with zeos because it seems not
>> clear if it has a future.
>>
>> Components are very inefficient, every time you open a table all
>> configuration / table meta data is fetched. No internal caching or
>> sth like this. (they are still faster than dbexpress / odbc / Zeos6.X)
>> Fields with unknown length are mapped wrong.
>> and so on-
>>
>> With Zeos 6.X you cannot use Postgresql - search path because 6.X
>> Versions always wrote schema name before table name. 6.X does not
>> support Cursor Fetch. 6.X isn't speacially for postgres, they try to
>> support all bigger databases.
>>
>> Has anyone tried .net - pgsql - driver with Delphi 2005?
>>
>> All in all my opinion is that there is no really good solution to
>> access Postgres from Delphi.
>>
>> Perhaps we should start a project at pgfoundry "PostgreSQL - Access
>> for Delphi".
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> Daniel.
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>

>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:58 PM
Tony Caduto
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Delphi - Developers start develop Access components

The issues mentioned with Zeos have been fixed, the 6.x branch works very well now and it much faster
thant the 5.x versions.
I use cursors all the time in my functions and return a refcursor which I then fetch.
The latest version of PostgresDAC from microolap also works good, I tried there 1.x stuff but it was designed for PG 7.2
and had no support at all for schemas.

Zeos does seem to be going no where.

I for one would not object to starting something new that just targeted Postgresql and worked with all features
i.e. like canceling a query and asynchronous queries.
The best bet would to just fork Zeos and pull out what is needed, no need to start totally from scratch.

Does anyone have experience writing Tdataset decendents?

The .net driver does work well, but ADO.net does not support always connected sessions, it works in a offline mode exactly
like tclientdataset.

Even with these small problems I still would never do a GUI database app with C# or Java when I can do it much faster and
easier with Delphi.



> With Zeos 6.X you cannot use Postgresql - search path because 6.X
> Versions always wrote schema name before table name. 6.X does not
> support Cursor Fetch. 6.X isn't speacially for postgres, they try to
> support all bigger databases.
>>

> Has anyone tried .net - pgsql - driver with Delphi 2005?
>
> All in all my opinion is that there is no really good solution to
> access Postgres from Delphi.
>
> Perhaps we should start a project at pgfoundry "PostgreSQL - Access
> for Delphi".
>



--
Tony Caduto
AM Software Design
Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql 8.x
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:58 PM
Daniel Schuchardt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Delphi - Developers start develop Access components

Tony Caduto schrieb:

> The issues mentioned with Zeos have been fixed, the 6.x branch works
> very well now and it much faster
> thant the 5.x versions.
> I use cursors all the time in my functions and return a refcursor
> which I then fetch.


??
How? On EoF of a TDataSet? Its clear that you can fetch manually. How do
you do that?

> The latest version of PostgresDAC from microolap also works good, I
> tried there 1.x stuff but it was designed for PG 7.2
> and had no support at all for schemas.
> Zeos does seem to be going no where.
>
> I for one would not object to starting something new that just
> targeted Postgresql and worked with all features
> i.e. like canceling a query and asynchronous queries.
> The best bet would to just fork Zeos and pull out what is needed, no
> need to start totally from scratch.


Thats what I would do too. Start a completely new Project makes no
sence, there are good Sources we could take and modify. But for speed
reasons I would support only PostgreSQL and RIP out anything else.

>
> Does anyone have experience writing Tdataset decendents?


Hm me not really, I fixed up things in zeos but thats all. All in all
that can't be really complicated, there are many small components
(textdrivers) and so that all are TDataSet descendents. So I think thats
not the point most complicated out there.

>
> The .net driver does work well, but ADO.net does not support always
> connected sessions, it works in a offline mode exactly
> like tclientdataset.
>
> Even with these small problems I still would never do a GUI database
> app with C# or Java when I can do it much faster and
> easier with Delphi.
>

Hm I think in that way too. But I try to reduce buissines logic in
Delphi. Delphi is still the best RAD - Developement tool IMHO.

Daniel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:58 PM
Tony Caduto
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Delphi - Developers start develop Access components

unless we are thinking of something different I do this:

sql.clear;
sql.add('select myfunction();');
sql.add('fetch all from return_cursor;');
open;

>
> ??
> How? On EoF of a TDataSet? Its clear that you can fetch manually. How do you do that?
>



--
Tony Caduto
AM Software Design
Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql 8.x
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 08:58 PM
Daniel Schuchardt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Delphi - Developers start develop Access components

Tony Caduto schrieb:

> unless we are thinking of something different I do this:
>
> sql.clear;
> sql.add('select myfunction();');
> sql.add('fetch all from return_cursor;');
> open;
>
> >
> > ??
> > How? On EoF of a TDataSet? Its clear that you can fetch manually.

> How do you do that?
> >

>
>

??? Thats not really cursor fetch. You always fetch all data this way.
Cursor fetch for example :

DECLARE c_test CURSOR FOR SELECT * FROM art ORDER BY ak_nr;
FETCH FORWARD 10 FROM c_test;

now only 10 Records are fetched via network. So networktraffic is low
and the user has a result imediatly.
now you can do again

FETCH FORWARD 10 FROM c_test;

With CURSOR FETCH I mean fetch data on demand and not as a complete block.

And why you dont return your resulset directly from your function?

example:

CREATE TYPE testresulttest AS (id INTEGER, test VARCHAR);

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION testresult() RETURNS SETOF testresulttest AS $$
DECLARE t testresulttest;
BEGIN
t.id:=1; t.test:='first row'; --or some record data
RETURN NEXT t;
t.id:=2; t.test:='middle row';
RETURN NEXT t;
t.id:=3; t.test:='last row';
RETURN NEXT t;
RETURN;
END $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

SELECT * FROM testresult();

this works fine from delphi too.

Daniel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736