Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql General

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Glen W. Mabey
 
Posts: n/a
Default difficulty extracting variable-sized field on triggered row

Hello,

I have been trying to write a trigger in C operating on each row
that would (as a first step) copy a field of type TEXT into a text*
variable.

I think that I've got the SPI_connect, SPI_fnumber, and SPI_getbinval
calls correct, but this gives me a Datum.

How do I convert a Datum to a text*?

The following is the best I could do, and it segfaults ...

Thank you,
Glen Mabey


if( CALLED_AS_TRIGGER( fcinfo ) ) {
elog(INFO, "unlink_file was called as a trigger." );
trigdata = (TriggerData *) fcinfo->context;

if( ( ret = SPI_connect() ) != SPI_OK_CONNECT ) {
elog(INFO, "SPI_connect returned %d", ret);
}

file_name_colnumber = SPI_fnumber( trigdata->tg_relation->rd_att, "file_name" );

if( file_name_colnumber == SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE ) {
elog(INFO, "SPI_fnumber returned SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE" );
}

SPI_getbinval( trigdata->tg_trigtuple, trigdata->tg_relation->rd_att, file_name_colnumber, isnull );
relative_filename_t = PG_DETOAST_DATUM( relative_filename_datum );

if( SPI_result == SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE ) {
elog(INFO, "SPI_fnumber returned SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE" );
}

if( ( ret = SPI_finish() ) != SPI_OK_FINISH ) {
elog(INFO, "SPI_finish returned %d", ret);
}
}


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Pavel Stehule
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: difficulty extracting variable-sized field on triggered row

On 04/12/2007, Glen W. Mabey <Glen.Mabey@swri.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been trying to write a trigger in C operating on each row
> that would (as a first step) copy a field of type TEXT into a text*
> variable.
>
> I think that I've got the SPI_connect, SPI_fnumber, and SPI_getbinval
> calls correct, but this gives me a Datum.
>
> How do I convert a Datum to a text*?
>


use macro DatumGetPointer(datum)

Pavel

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Glen W. Mabey
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: difficulty extracting variable-sized field ontriggered row

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:10:21AM -0600, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> use macro DatumGetPointer(datum)


When I do that, I get the following compiler warning:

warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type

which is what originally motivated me to look for another means, which
led me to use PG_DETOAST_DATUM.

Using DatumGetPointer also seg faults ...

Is there somewhere that I am not adequately checking for an error?

Thanks,
Glen

TriggerData *trigdata;
Datum relative_filename_datum;
text *relative_filename_t;
int file_name_colnumber, ret;
bool *isnull;

if( CALLED_AS_TRIGGER( fcinfo ) ) {
elog(INFO, "unlink_file was called as a trigger." );
trigdata = (TriggerData *) fcinfo->context;

if( ( ret = SPI_connect() ) != SPI_OK_CONNECT ) {
elog(INFO, "SPI_connect returned %d", ret);
}

file_name_colnumber = SPI_fnumber( trigdata->tg_relation->rd_att, "file_name" );

if( file_name_colnumber == SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE ) {
elog(INFO, "SPI_fnumber returned SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE" );
}

SPI_getbinval( trigdata->tg_trigtuple, trigdata->tg_relation->rd_att, file_name_colnumber, isnull );

if( SPI_result == SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE ) {
elog(INFO, "SPI_fnumber returned SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE" );
}

relative_filename_t = PG_DETOAST_DATUM( relative_filename_datum );

if( ( ret = SPI_finish() ) != SPI_OK_FINISH ) {
elog(INFO, "SPI_finish returned %d", ret);
}

}

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Alvaro Herrera
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: difficulty extracting variable-sized field ontriggered row

Glen W. Mabey escribió:

> TriggerData *trigdata;
> Datum relative_filename_datum;
> text *relative_filename_t;
> int file_name_colnumber, ret;
> bool *isnull;


This is wrong. Try

bool isnull;

and later:

SPI_getbinval( trigdata->tg_trigtuple, trigdata->tg_relation->rd_att, file_name_colnumber, &isnull );

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC
"No hay ausente sin culpa ni presente sin disculpa" (Prov. francés)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: difficulty extracting variable-sized field on triggered row

"Glen W. Mabey" <Glen.Mabey@swri.org> writes:
> Is there somewhere that I am not adequately checking for an error?


1. You're passing SPI_getbinval an uninitialized bool pointer.

2. You're discarding its result, which you need.

3. You're not checking for a null, and the error check you do have
is wrong/redundant.

4. Use DatumGetTextP(), not DatumGetPointer nor PG_DETOAST_DATUM.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Martijn van Oosterhout
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: difficulty extracting variable-sized field on triggered row

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:26:46AM -0600, Glen W. Mabey wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:10:21AM -0600, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > use macro DatumGetPointer(datum)

>
> When I do that, I get the following compiler warning:
>
> warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type


Well yes, you're getting a (void*) which you need to cast to a (text*).
It's the generic cast for indirect types.

> Using DatumGetPointer also seg faults ...


What actually segfault? Not DatumGetPointer() since that's just a cast.

> Is there somewhere that I am not adequately checking for an error?


Depends what you're doing. Remember, a (text*) is a varlena object so
you need to use the VAR_DATA,VAR_LEN macros to access it. The string is
not nul-terminated for example. If you want to get a plain C-string,
use textout or DatumToCString or something similar.

However, DETOAST is the right step, because if you don't do that you
might be handed a toasted string.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
> -- John F Kennedy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHVXW2IB7bNG8LQkwRAo7uAJ4zd8tl5w8B6JXtI9LpqM MYg8TEWQCfYlN1
v4WXFcfDJ/rmrzH0wQZkz6o=
=fSsB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Glen W. Mabey
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: difficulty extracting variable-sized field ontriggered row

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:53:37AM -0600, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Glen W. Mabey" <Glen.Mabey@swri.org> writes:
> > Is there somewhere that I am not adequately checking for an error?

>
> 1. You're passing SPI_getbinval an uninitialized bool pointer.


Doh!

> 2. You're discarding its result, which you need.


Ah yes, a change I made while trying to debug things.

> 3. You're not checking for a null, and the error check you do have
> is wrong/redundant.


The field is constrained to be NOT NULL, so I wasn't worried about
checking that, but I don't see how the error check is wrong, according
to the description of SPI_getbinval at

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/i...getbinval.html

What is then the appropriate way to check for failure of SPI_getbinval?

> 4. Use DatumGetTextP(), not DatumGetPointer nor PG_DETOAST_DATUM.


Searching for DatumGetTextP from the search text box at the top of
www.postgresql.org yields no hits, and a google search on DatumGetTextP
does not seem to turnip [sic] any direct documentation on this function.

Is there somewhere in the docs that I should have found this (and other
useful) functions?

Thank you very much,
Glen Mabey

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org/

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: difficulty extracting variable-sized field on triggered row

"Glen W. Mabey" <Glen.Mabey@swri.org> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:53:37AM -0600, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 3. You're not checking for a null, and the error check you do have
>> is wrong/redundant.


> The field is constrained to be NOT NULL, so I wasn't worried about
> checking that, but I don't see how the error check is wrong,


Well, a check on the isnull state is a good idea anyway IMHO.
This code has no way of being sure that a NOT NULL constraint
exists, and dumping core if it's not there isn't my idea of being
robust.

What I didn't like about the error test was that it assumed that
SPI_ERROR_NOATTRIBUTE is and always will be the only possible
error code from SPI_getbinval. I'd test for SPI_result != 0 instead.
(The "redundant" comment came from the thought that it's probably
pointless to be making this test at all, considering that you just
got the column number from SPI_fnumber on the same tupdesc.)

>> 4. Use DatumGetTextP(), not DatumGetPointer nor PG_DETOAST_DATUM.


> Is there somewhere in the docs that I should have found this (and other
> useful) functions?


fmgr.h, perhaps, or by looking at existing code that does more or less
what you want to do. Postgres does not follow the model that you are
supposed to look only at the SGML docs to find out how to do server-side
programming. We are open source and one of the biggest benefits of that
is that you can (and should) look at the source code to learn.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 11:13 PM
Sam Mason
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: difficulty extracting variable-sized field on triggered row

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:11:04AM -0600, Glen W. Mabey wrote:
> Searching for DatumGetTextP from the search text box at the top of
> www.postgresql.org yields no hits, and a google search on DatumGetTextP
> does not seem to turnip [sic] any direct documentation on this function.
>
> Is there somewhere in the docs that I should have found this (and other
> useful) functions?


I find the following tool helpful:

http://doxygen.postgresql.org/


Sam

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665