Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql General

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:13 PM
Gerald D. Anderson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Old problem needs solution

Greetings!

At some point, I'm not even sure when, I apparently had a bad upgrade on
one of my production databases. I'm in a situation now where I've got
my back up against a wall and not sure what to do. The problem is, I'm
receiving this message frequently:

did not find '}' at end of input node

I am currently running version 7.4.7 and am trying to migrate on up to
8. The data is completely available to the application (large forums
database is primary concern), but I can't back it up or do anything with
it aside from let it dig itself deeper.

Does anybody have a suggestion on how to fix this, or some way around
it? I could probably write a script to suck all my data out and push it
back in, but I'm hoping and praying there's something better out there,
hopefully a real honest to goodness fix for it ; )

Thanks,

G


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:13 PM
Richard Huxton
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

Gerald D. Anderson wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> At some point, I'm not even sure when, I apparently had a bad upgrade on
> one of my production databases. I'm in a situation now where I've got
> my back up against a wall and not sure what to do. The problem is, I'm
> receiving this message frequently:
>
> did not find '}' at end of input node


When?

> I am currently running version 7.4.7 and am trying to migrate on up to
> 8. The data is completely available to the application (large forums
> database is primary concern), but I can't back it up or do anything with
> it aside from let it dig itself deeper.


Can you pg_dump individual tables (with -t my_table_name)

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:13 PM
Gerald D. Anderson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

data # pg_dump -Fc -f blah.txt -tforums_auth forums22 -u
User name: postgres
Password:
pg_dump: SQL command failed
pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: did not find '}' at end of
input node
pg_dump: The command was: SELECT (SELECT usename FROM pg_user WHERE
usesysid = datdba) as dba, pg_encoding_to_char(encoding) as encoding,
datpath FROM pg_database WHERE datname = 'forums22'

That help? As far as when, pretty much anytime I do anything. My guess
is messed up metadata.

G


Richard Huxton wrote:

> Gerald D. Anderson wrote:
>
>> Greetings!
>>
>> At some point, I'm not even sure when, I apparently had a bad upgrade
>> on one of my production databases. I'm in a situation now where I've
>> got my back up against a wall and not sure what to do. The problem
>> is, I'm receiving this message frequently:
>>
>> did not find '}' at end of input node

>
>
> When?
>
>> I am currently running version 7.4.7 and am trying to migrate on up
>> to 8. The data is completely available to the application (large
>> forums database is primary concern), but I can't back it up or do
>> anything with it aside from let it dig itself deeper.

>
>
> Can you pg_dump individual tables (with -t my_table_name)
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:13 PM
Alvaro Herrera
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:24:25AM -0500, Gerald D. Anderson wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> At some point, I'm not even sure when, I apparently had a bad upgrade on
> one of my production databases. I'm in a situation now where I've got
> my back up against a wall and not sure what to do. The problem is, I'm
> receiving this message frequently:
>
> did not find '}' at end of input node


Are you using Gentoo? Are you using the hierarchical queries patch?
Were you using any of the above in the previous Postgres version?

If this is the case, you will have to get the old postmaster again, and
run it against your data directory, and use that to make the dump. The
reload it in the new directory.

The problem with the hierarchical queries patch (which Gentoo applies to
some of their builds) is that it doesn't include the necessary
catalog-version increment. So people can use the same data directory
with or without the patch applied, which is a mistake because it causes
the errors you are seeing.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"Use it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without"

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:13 PM
Richard Huxton
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

Gerald D. Anderson wrote:
> data # pg_dump -Fc -f blah.txt -tforums_auth forums22 -u User
> name: postgres
> Password:
> pg_dump: SQL command failed
> pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: did not find '}' at end of
> input node
> pg_dump: The command was: SELECT (SELECT usename FROM pg_user WHERE
> usesysid = datdba) as dba, pg_encoding_to_char(encoding) as encoding,
> datpath FROM pg_database WHERE datname = 'forums22'
>
> That help? As far as when, pretty much anytime I do anything. My guess
> is messed up metadata.


Yep - I'm guessing it's an issue with an array (group membership?) in
pg_user.

Can you SELECT * FROM pg_user?
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:13 PM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
> Yep - I'm guessing it's an issue with an array (group membership?) in
> pg_user.


No, I'll bet lunch that Alvaro fingered the correct culprit: either
addition or subtraction of that darn hierarchical-query patch. It
changes the on-disk representation of view rules in a way that produces
exactly this failure mode.

One of the disadvantages of open source is that you can't prevent people
from breaking your software :-(

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:14 PM
Gerald D. Anderson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

Ok, well it looks like Richard owes Tom a lunch, or that's my best guess
anyway. I am running Gentoo, as far as that particular patch, I'm
unsure, but if it's installed by default then yes. So, I've pulled down
the earliest ebuild I can get which is 7.3.6. Get it installed and go
to start it:

FATAL: The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL version 7.4,
which is not compatible with this version 7.3.6.

So, the plot thickens. Is there somewhere I can go tweak a few bytes to
make it think it's 7.3? Also, is 7.3 going to be early enough? This
database has been around for years, and like I said, I'm not sure when
this happened : /

Truly appreciate the help guys!

g



Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:24:25AM -0500, Gerald D. Anderson wrote:
>
>
>>Greetings!
>>
>>At some point, I'm not even sure when, I apparently had a bad upgrade on
>>one of my production databases. I'm in a situation now where I've got
>>my back up against a wall and not sure what to do. The problem is, I'm
>>receiving this message frequently:
>>
>>did not find '}' at end of input node
>>
>>

>
>Are you using Gentoo? Are you using the hierarchical queries patch?
>Were you using any of the above in the previous Postgres version?
>
>If this is the case, you will have to get the old postmaster again, and
>run it against your data directory, and use that to make the dump. The
>reload it in the new directory.
>
>The problem with the hierarchical queries patch (which Gentoo applies to
>some of their builds) is that it doesn't include the necessary
>catalog-version increment. So people can use the same data directory
>with or without the patch applied, which is a mistake because it causes
>the errors you are seeing.
>
>
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:14 PM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

"Gerald D. Anderson" <gander@vte.com> writes:
> So, the plot thickens. Is there somewhere I can go tweak a few bytes to
> make it think it's 7.3?


No. That's not what you want anyway; you want a late 7.4 build, just
one without the hierarchical-queries patch. I dunno enough about Gentoo
to say how you get rid of a patch you don't want, but if it's anything
like RPMs, you can just dike the patch out of the specfile and rebuild.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:15 PM
Russell Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:38 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Gerald D. Anderson" <gander@vte.com> writes:
> > So, the plot thickens. Is there somewhere I can go tweak a few bytes to
> > make it think it's 7.3?

>
> No. That's not what you want anyway; you want a late 7.4 build, just
> one without the hierarchical-queries patch. I dunno enough about Gentoo
> to say how you get rid of a patch you don't want, but if it's anything
> like RPMs, you can just dike the patch out of the specfile and rebuild.
>

USE="-pg-hier" emerge -vp =postgresql-7.4.7-r2

Will do the job on gentoo. It's not enabled by default unless somebody has put
pg-hier somewhere in the use flags.

Regards

Russell Smith



> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 09:15 PM
Gerald D. Anderson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Old problem needs solution

Yup, was just going to respond this morning. It isn't enabled by
default (at least in the ebuilds I've looked at). I've built it with
pg_hier and without pg_hier and get the same results either way : /
Might there be some other cause for this? Or even a dirty fix if this
is what it is?

Gerald


Russell Smith wrote:

>On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:38 am, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>"Gerald D. Anderson" <gander@vte.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>>So, the plot thickens. Is there somewhere I can go tweak a few bytes to
>>>make it think it's 7.3?
>>>
>>>

>>No. That's not what you want anyway; you want a late 7.4 build, just
>>one without the hierarchical-queries patch. I dunno enough about Gentoo
>>to say how you get rid of a patch you don't want, but if it's anything
>>like RPMs, you can just dike the patch out of the specfile and rebuild.
>>
>>
>>

>USE="-pg-hier" emerge -vp =postgresql-7.4.7-r2
>
>Will do the job on gentoo. It's not enabled by default unless somebody has put
>pg-hier somewhere in the use flags.
>
>Regards
>
>Russell Smith
>
>
>
>
>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>> joining column's datatypes do not match
>>
>>
>>
>>

>
>
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623