Unix Technical Forum

Re: Postgresql replication

This is a discussion on Re: Postgresql replication within the Pgsql General forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Jeff Davis writes: >The disadvantages: one more: if you actually have m tables and n servers, you have m ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql General

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 05:39 AM
Welty, Richard
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Postgresql replication

Jeff Davis writes:

>The disadvantages:


one more: if you actually have m tables and n servers, you have
m x n tables in reality, which is pretty miserable scaling behavior.
i should think that rules, triggers, and embedded procedures would
explode in complexity rather rapidly.

i know i wouldn't want to administer one of these if there were a lot
of sites.

>I hope this is helpful. Let me know if there's some reason my plan won't
>work.


look at the solution in pgreplicator. site ids are embedded in the
id columns in the tables, so there only m tables, and a bit less insanity.

richard
(dropping out of this conversation, i'm unsubscribing while on vacation)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com