This is a discussion on Restoring 8.0 db to 8.1 within the Pgsql General forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Hi I am trying to upgrade my database from 8.0 to 8.1 and am looking for a little info/advice. ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi I am trying to upgrade my database from 8.0 to 8.1 and am looking for a little info/advice. This is a production database that we are migrating and it is in CONSTANT use, so the maintenance window must be small and hopefully mostly off-hours. We use a PITR/LVM snapshot solution for our backups and were hoping to simply restore the filesystem and startup under 8.1. Obviously this didnt work, and I know the doc says a conversion is necessary, however I havent found anything with enough detail to sway me from a better solution than pg_restore. The problem with pg_restore is that our database takes 3+ weeks to restore from a dump file. This is not an acceptable window for us. ( Approximately 3 days of this is data + lobs, and the rest indexes and constraints. If we are doing something wrong here, I am all ears as well ) Could anyone point me to the information I am missing or offer some middle ground solutions? TIA Bill |
| |||
| On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:53:49AM -0500, beer@cmu.edu wrote: > I am trying to upgrade my database from 8.0 to 8.1 and am looking for a > little info/advice. > > This is a production database that we are migrating and it is in CONSTANT > use, so the maintenance window must be small and hopefully mostly off-hours. The usual answer is use slony. You can use it to replicate the 8.0 server onto an 8.1 server. This may take weeks/months/years/whatever to synchronise. When the slave is up to date, you pull the plug on the 8.0 server and get everyone to use the 8.1 server... No downtime... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. > -- John F Kennedy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHa+U2IB7bNG8LQkwRAnZNAJwOfcGBPXU0I5nUo3887Q BkkXQQqACfYJRy RNXhgY4+bgNMS1vTgvGqjBw= =szk7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| "beer@cmu.edu" <beer@cmu.edu> writes: > The problem with pg_restore is that our database takes 3+ weeks to restore > from a dump file. This is not an acceptable window for us. ( Approximately > 3 days of this is data + lobs, and the rest indexes and constraints. If we > are doing something wrong here, I am all ears as well ) Uh, how big is that database exactly? One question is, if migration is so painful, why are you updating to a branch that is already obsolete? At this point you should be skipping 8.1.x and going directly to 8.2.x; or maybe planning to wait a few more weeks and go to 8.3.x. I say this not just on general principles, but mindful of the fact that there were some pretty significant improvements in sorting speed in 8.2, which would translate directly to shorter btree index build times. (Are all your indexes btrees?) Also, are you following the guidelines at http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdo...PULATE-PG-DUMP ? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| beer@cmu.edu wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to upgrade my database from 8.0 to 8.1 and am looking for a > little info/advice. > > This is a production database that we are migrating and it is in CONSTANT > use, so the maintenance window must be small and hopefully mostly off-hours. > > We use a PITR/LVM snapshot solution for our backups and were hoping to > simply restore the filesystem and startup under 8.1. Obviously this didnt > work, and I know the doc says a conversion is necessary, however I havent > found anything with enough detail to sway me from a better solution than > pg_restore. Slony will let you replicate between different versions. Given that you can't afford any downtime, and presumably don't want to repeat this process in a hurry, I'd suggest going to 8.2, or 8.3 if you can afford to wait a few weeks. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| On Dec 21, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > The usual answer is use slony. You can use it to replicate the 8.0 > server onto an 8.1 server. This may take weeks/months/years/whatever > to > synchronise. When the slave is up to date, you pull the plug on the > 8.0 > server and get everyone to use the 8.1 server... No downtime... > except he has large objects, which slony can't replicate. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| |||
| On Dec 21, 2007 8:53 PM, beer@cmu.edu <beer@cmu.edu> wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to upgrade my database from 8.0 to 8.1 and am looking for a > little info/advice. > > This is a production database that we are migrating and it is in CONSTANT > use, so the maintenance window must be small and hopefully mostly off-hours. > > > We use a PITR/LVM snapshot solution for our backups and were hoping to > simply restore the filesystem and startup under 8.1. Obviously this didnt > work, and I know the doc says a conversion is necessary, however I havent > found anything with enough detail to sway me from a better solution than > pg_restore. > > The problem with pg_restore is that our database takes 3+ weeks to restore > from a dump file. This is not an acceptable window for us. ( Approximately > 3 days of this is data + lobs, and the rest indexes and constraints. If we > are doing something wrong here, I am all ears as well ) > > Could anyone point me to the information I am missing or offer some middle > ground solutions? You can try and see if the pg_migrator project helps you . http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pg-migrator/, its still in beta, but IIRC handles relatively simpler scenarios nicely. -- Usama Munir Dar http://www.linkedin.com/in/usamadar Consultant Architect Cell:+92 321 5020666 Skype: usamadar |
| |||
| Hello Vivek, Am 2007-12-21 15:59:21, schrieb Vivek Khera: > > On Dec 21, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > >The usual answer is use slony. You can use it to replicate the 8.0 > >server onto an 8.1 server. This may take weeks/months/years/whatever > >to > >synchronise. When the slave is up to date, you pull the plug on the > >8.0 > >server and get everyone to use the 8.1 server... No downtime... > > > > except he has large objects, which slony can't replicate. currently or will this be changed in the future? My PostgreSQL 8.2 is now a little bit more then 900 GByte without and 3800 GByte with indexes and restoring a dump take several days on my Opteron with 8 GByte of memory using 15000 RpM 300 GByte SCSI drives. Note: I am already using "TableSpace" and "TablePartitioning" to fight the enormeous size which is growing every day by arround 350 MB. ...and since I am not God or the absolute PostgreSQL guru (which should redesign my Database-Structure) I have a bunch of "Large Objects" in this pig which should be normaly on a fileserver or such! Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##################### Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHghP0C0FPBMSS+BIRAnXtAJ0YGnffDBbg+i52tOSqhE haHHXI4wCgqv6h wpA0pcGzKYlw6Ty594KM8lc= =1Tos -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| ||||
| On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > except he has large objects, which slony can't replicate. > > currently or will this be changed in the future? Not likely to change in the future, no. Slony uses triggers to manage the changed rows. We can't fire triggers on large object events, so there's no way for Slony to know what happened. A ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |