vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| Marian Naghen schrieb: > Can anyones suggest some readings about implementing > sequences w/o holes ? not w/o a busload of race conditions and/or heavy locking. Usually you want to avoid this. So are you really sure you dont just want if for cosmetics? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| ||||
| On Dec 19, 2005, at 20:14 , Marian Naghen wrote: > Can anyones suggest some readings about implementing > sequences w/o holes ? Check the mailing list archives. In short, if you want to guarantee no holes, you don't use sequences. IIRC, the process is: 1. Set up another table (foo) that holds the current value. 2. To grab a new value, increment the current value in foo and use the current value in your insert within a transaction. If you delete rows from your table, you'll need to do some updating if you want to maintain having no holes. Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |