Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql General

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:37 AM
Antimon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Timestamp vs timestamptz

Hi,
I'm working on a web project with pgsql, i did use mysql before and
stored epoch in database so i'm not familiar with these datatypes.

What i wanna ask is, if i don't need to display timestamps in different
timezones, shall i use timestamptz anyway? I mean, i'm gonna need
timestamp columns on some tables for internal calculations and stuff
like delaying actions, adding a row with a timestamp of 10 minutes
later and check for them every minute, fetch elapsed ones and process,
not to display them to users.

Will there be any advantages of using timestamptz type for this? I
thought, only if i move the website to some other server with another
timezone or something, all my timestamps and delayed actions would
still be accurate to the system clock..

Shall i just use timestmap type or timestamptz for this?

Thanks.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:37 AM
David Fetter
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timestamp vs timestamptz

On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:35:20PM -0700, Antimon wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm working on a web project with pgsql, i did use mysql before and
> stored epoch in database so i'm not familiar with these datatypes.
>
> What i wanna ask is, if i don't need to display timestamps in
> different timezones,


Not this week, but who knows about next week?

> shall i use timestamptz anyway?


Yes. Timestamptz is the one.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:37 AM
Agent M
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timestamp vs timestamptz

But watch out! This is mentioned in the docs but it bit me when I used
timestamp with time zone so:

timestamp with time zone does not record the timezone you inserted it
with- it simply stores the GMT version and converts to whatever
timezone you like on demand. If the timezone is important data, you
will need an extra column for it. For example, flight arrival
information should probably include the timezone of the destination.

-M

On Jul 13, 2006, at 8:04 PM, David Fetter wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:35:20PM -0700, Antimon wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm working on a web project with pgsql, i did use mysql before and
>> stored epoch in database so i'm not familiar with these datatypes.
>>
>> What i wanna ask is, if i don't need to display timestamps in
>> different timezones,

>
> Not this week, but who knows about next week?
>
>> shall i use timestamptz anyway?

>
> Yes. Timestamptz is the one.


¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬
AgentM
agentm@themactionfaction.com
¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:37 AM
Michael Glaesemann
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timestamp vs timestamptz


On Jul 13, 2006, at 21:49 , Agent M wrote:

> For example, flight arrival information should probably include the
> timezone of the destination.


Of course, for this example you'd also want to know *where* the
flight is arriving, which would also let you know the appropriate
time zone in an indirect way. Hopefully we'll be able to store time
zone information with the timestamp sometime. It's been discussed
before, but I don't believe a concrete proposal has been put forward
yet.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:37 AM
Florian Weimer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timestamp vs timestamptz

* Agent M.:

> timestamp with time zone does not record the timezone you inserted it
> with- it simply stores the GMT version and converts to whatever
> timezone you like on demand.


Are you sure? This behavior is not documented, and I can't reproduce
it with PostgresQL 8.1.4.

--
Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Durlacher Allee 47 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76131 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:37 AM
Martijn van Oosterhout
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timestamp vs timestamptz

On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:35:20PM -0700, Antimon wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm working on a web project with pgsql, i did use mysql before and
> stored epoch in database so i'm not familiar with these datatypes.
>
> What i wanna ask is, if i don't need to display timestamps in different
> timezones, shall i use timestamptz anyway? I mean, i'm gonna need
> timestamp columns on some tables for internal calculations and stuff
> like delaying actions, adding a row with a timestamp of 10 minutes
> later and check for them every minute, fetch elapsed ones and process,
> not to display them to users.


The choice between timezone and timezonetz depends on what you're using
it for:

timestamptz identifies a specific point in time. It will be adjusted
before output to reflect the timezone of the person selecting it.

timestamp is a representation of a wall clock.

The difference is easy to show when you're dealing with daylight
savings times. In central european time the date '2006-03-26 02:30:00'
doesn't exist, yet you can store it in a timestamp, but not in a
timestamptz.

For timestamptz, the time jumps from 2006-03-26 02:00:00 +0100 to
2006-03-26 03:00:00 +0200. And calculations take this into account.
Similarly when daylight savings ends, a timestamptz can handle the fact
that 2:30 am occurs twice, whereas timestamp won't.

You can use the X AT TIME ZONE Y construct to convert between the two.

Hope this helps,

--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEt0/8IB7bNG8LQkwRArqDAJ0W8AdBxYUC6g55lc8ZsXbZvv46TACfV AXv
4l+gIoyJSK1tgOdF9pHUKP4=
=9tLJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:37 AM
Antimon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timestamp vs timestamptz

Thanks for the replies, and thanks for mentioning the DST thing.
So, i'm going to use tstz. I just don't want my data to be affected by
timezone changes and dst etc.

I had a game server which had a timer system, when i delay something it
was creating an object with timestamp "now + delaytime" and check for
the timers in main loop. Was a windows server and automatically
adjucted dst, and everything stopped in game All timers was pointing
like 1hour and 13ms later. I had to restart it.
I just don't wanna have problems like this.

Thanks again all for helping.

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:35:20PM -0700, Antimon wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm working on a web project with pgsql, i did use mysql before and
> > stored epoch in database so i'm not familiar with these datatypes.
> >
> > What i wanna ask is, if i don't need to display timestamps in different
> > timezones, shall i use timestamptz anyway? I mean, i'm gonna need
> > timestamp columns on some tables for internal calculations and stuff
> > like delaying actions, adding a row with a timestamp of 10 minutes
> > later and check for them every minute, fetch elapsed ones and process,
> > not to display them to users.

>
> The choice between timezone and timezonetz depends on what you're using
> it for:
>
> timestamptz identifies a specific point in time. It will be adjusted
> before output to reflect the timezone of the person selecting it.
>
> timestamp is a representation of a wall clock.
>
> The difference is easy to show when you're dealing with daylight
> savings times. In central european time the date '2006-03-26 02:30:00'
> doesn't exist, yet you can store it in a timestamp, but not in a
> timestamptz.
>
> For timestamptz, the time jumps from 2006-03-26 02:00:00 +0100 to
> 2006-03-26 03:00:00 +0200. And calculations take this into account.
> Similarly when daylight savings ends, a timestamptz can handle the fact
> that 2:30 am occurs twice, whereas timestamp won't.
>
> You can use the X AT TIME ZONE Y construct to convert between the two.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> --
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

>
> --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> Content-Disposition: inline;
> filename="signature.asc"
> Content-Description: Digital signature
> X-Google-AttachSize: 190


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:38 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timestamp vs timestamptz

Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> writes:
> * Agent M.:
>> timestamp with time zone does not record the timezone you inserted it
>> with- it simply stores the GMT version and converts to whatever
>> timezone you like on demand.


> Are you sure? This behavior is not documented, and I can't reproduce
> it with PostgresQL 8.1.4.


Huh? Section 8.5.1.3. Time Stamps says

For timestamp with time zone, the internally stored value is always in
UTC (Universal Coordinated Time, traditionally known as Greenwich Mean
Time, GMT). An input value that has an explicit time zone specified is
converted to UTC using the appropriate offset for that time zone. If no
time zone is stated in the input string, then it is assumed to be in the
time zone indicated by the system's timezone parameter, and is converted
to UTC using the offset for the timezone zone.

and again in section 8.5.3. Time Zones:

All timezone-aware dates and times are stored internally in UTC. They
are converted to local time in the zone specified by the timezone
configuration parameter before being displayed to the client.


There's been some talk of modifying timestamptz to store the original
timezone specification along with the actual value, but at the moment
all it is is a seconds-since-the-epoch numeric value.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 10:38 AM
Florian Weimer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Timestamp vs timestamptz

* Tom Lane:

> Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> writes:
>> * Agent M.:
>>> timestamp with time zone does not record the timezone you inserted it
>>> with- it simply stores the GMT version and converts to whatever
>>> timezone you like on demand.

>
>> Are you sure? This behavior is not documented, and I can't reproduce
>> it with PostgresQL 8.1.4.

>
> Huh? Section 8.5.1.3. Time Stamps says


Oops, I misread what Agent M wrote--"timestamp with time zone" vs
"timestamp with time zone". Sorry about that.

--
Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Durlacher Allee 47 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76131 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707