vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I was wondering if you guys have some suggested settings for our server, i think we are not hardware limited but the configureation is set up incorrectly. For some reason our database seems to have trouble handling 5-10+ inserts per second which seems to be a pretty trivial load for this hardware, we're seeing very high %iowait, this is a pretty typical output for #iostat -m 5 avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 0.97 0.00 0.82 89.69 0.00 8.52 Device: tps MB_read/s MB_wrtn/s MB_read MB_wrtn sda 85.40 0.18 0.72 0 3 sdb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 sdc 30.43 0.00 0.76 0 3 sdd 93.91 0.71 0.12 3 0 sda = 2x320GB 7200rpm in RAID1 (operating system) sdc = 2x150GB 10krpm in RAID1 (transaction log is on this array) sdd = 6x150GB 10krpm in RAID 10 (database is on the array) we're using ReiserFS on each of the arrays as the file system OS is debian Etch x64 raid controller = 3ware 9650 12port - 256MB cache 8GB RAM, core 2 duo - quad core 2.4ghz 8MB L2 Cache it would seem like the io subsystem is the limiting factor, but i feel like we should be barely hitting a wall, you can see from the example its writing < 2MB/s to the array. If i try to copy a big file (1-2GB) over to the array, the array hits 300MB/s sustained, it can burst write files < 256mb AT 800MB/S Here's some of our settings shared_buffers = 1024MB temp_buffers = 32MB max_prepared_transactions = 50 work_mem = 64MB maintenance_work_mem = 256MB max_stack_depth = 7MB max_fsm_pages = 512000 vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms fsync = on wal_buffers = 1MB checkpoint_segments = 32 effective_cache_size = 4128MB If you guys have any suggestions it would be greatly appreciated -Evan Reiser |
| ||||
| Here is the table structure for the table with all the inserts id(PK) integer dateinserted datetime without timezone dateexamined datetime without timezone lockedby integer done boolean failed boolean invalid boolean >select * from table limit 1; id | done | failed | dateinserted | dateexamined | lockedby | invalid --------+------+--------+---------------------+----------------+----------+--------- 3130902 | f | f | 1900-01-01 00:00:00 | | 0 | f There is a clustered index on dateinserted, + a non clustered index on id + a non clustered index on done,failed,invalid + a non clustered index on lockedby There are no triggers On 7/3/07, Evan Reiser <evan.reiser@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was wondering if you guys have some suggested settings for our server, i > think we are not hardware limited but the configureation is set up > incorrectly. For some reason our database seems to have trouble handling > 5-10+ inserts per second which seems to be a pretty trivial load for this > hardware, we're seeing very high %iowait, this is a pretty typical output > for #iostat -m 5 > > avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle > 0.97 0.00 0.82 89.69 0.00 8.52 > > Device: tps MB_read/s MB_wrtn/s MB_read MB_wrtn > sda 85.40 0.18 0.72 > 0 3 > sdb 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 0 0 > sdc 30.43 0.00 0.76 > 0 3 > sdd 93.91 0.71 0.12 3 > 0 > > > > > sda = 2x320GB 7200rpm in RAID1 (operating system) > sdc = 2x150GB 10krpm in RAID1 (transaction log is on this array) > sdd = 6x150GB 10krpm in RAID 10 (database is on the array) > > we're using ReiserFS on each of the arrays as the file system > OS is debian Etch x64 > > raid controller = 3ware 9650 12port - 256MB cache > > 8GB RAM, core 2 duo - quad core 2.4ghz 8MB L2 Cache > > it would seem like the io subsystem is the limiting factor, but i feel > like we should be barely hitting a wall, you can see from the example its > writing < 2MB/s to the array. If i try to copy a big file (1-2GB) over to > the array, the array hits 300MB/s sustained, it can burst write files < > 256mb AT 800MB/S > > Here's some of our settings > > > shared_buffers = 1024MB > temp_buffers = 32MB > max_prepared_transactions = 50 > work_mem = 64MB > maintenance_work_mem = 256MB > max_stack_depth = 7MB > max_fsm_pages = 512000 > > vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms > > fsync = on > wal_buffers = 1MB > checkpoint_segments = 32 > > effective_cache_size = 4128MB > > If you guys have any suggestions it would be greatly appreciated > > -Evan Reiser > |