This is a discussion on N-to-N implementation within the pgsql Admins forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Hi all, I'd like to set up a discussion (if necessary) about two different ways to implement N-to-N relationships: ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi all, I'd like to set up a discussion (if necessary) about two different ways to implement N-to-N relationships: using a N-to-N intermediary table or, suppose an A and B tables situation, creating the primary key of the table B with the A.id plus a sequencer. I'm thinking on going the second way, but decided to ask the list if anybody sees any potencial problem in it, like for performance or anything. Filipe Knoedt |
| ||||
| On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Filipe Knoedt wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to set up a discussion (if necessary) about two different ways to implement N-to-N relationships: using a N-to-N intermediary table or, suppose an A and B tables situation, creating the primary key of the table B with the A.id plus a sequencer. > > I'm thinking on going the second way, but decided to ask the list if anybody sees any potencial problem in it, like for performance or anything. we use contrib/intarray to avoid joining > > Filipe Knoedt Regards, Oleg __________________________________________________ ___________ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |