vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:41:36AM -0500, Michael D. Sofka wrote: > >I suggest looking at your current bottleneck first. > >It's likely to be the most cost-efficient route out. > > I/O is our bottleneck. The machine is not CPU loaded. And, in fact, > our current performance is good. The machine upgrade is planned with a > service upgrade. Current hardware is old, and so getting more expensive > to support. We also anticipate service growth (read, more spam), and > so are planning accordingly. Which, as I mentioned, is why RAID5 is not a good solution if you're doing any writes at all. You're talking about a 16G database that you expect to grow to 64G. That would fit happily in a RAID1 (mirror) of two SCSI 72G drives. I haven't priced that kind of stuff out recently, but I believe you're looking at $300-$500. If that doesn't provide enough performance, go to a RAID10 and add more drives. If you're doing much writing at all, spring for a battery-backed controller so you can enable write caching. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| ||||
| On Monday 21 November 2005 12:12, you wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:41:36AM -0500, Michael D. Sofka wrote: > You're talking about a 16G database that you expect to grow to 64G. That > would fit happily in a RAID1 (mirror) of two SCSI 72G drives. I haven't > priced that kind of stuff out recently, but I believe you're looking at > $300-$500. If that doesn't provide enough performance, go to a RAID10 > and add more drives. If you're doing much writing at all, spring for a > battery-backed controller so you can enable write caching. More like $7k, till you add in the JBOD, the Perc card and 15,000 rpm SCSI disks, with hot spars (the journal mirror goes on the same JBOD). But you're right, we will have sufficient disks on the JBOD for RAID 1+0. Mike -- Michael D. Sofka sofkam@rpi.edu C&CT Sr. Systems Programmer Email, TeX, epistemology. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. http://www.rpi.edu/~sofkam/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |